• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Is Zimmerman brave, subborn or stupid? [W: 218]

Excon said:
...You want to bet, if there is a trial, that she doesn't get to testify?
Click to expand...

it is disgusting & pathetic that you want to turn this into a money-making opportunity.

it shows how little respect you have for this event.
 
Thunder said:
it is disgusting & pathetic that you want to turn this into a money-making opportunity.

it shows how little respect you have for this event.
Click to expand...
:lamo

There you go with that **** again. Who said anything about money?

And placing a bet as to whether or not Diasha gets to testify, if there is a trial, is not pathetic or disgusting.
It is far from it. Very far from it.
 
Thunder said:
it would be VERY pathetic & disgusting.

not everything is about money, Excon.
Click to expand...
No it wouldn't be at all.
It is far, far less than, "very pathetic & disgusting". lol
It isn't even on par with your repeated denials of Zimmerman's injuries being consistent with his account.


And again: Who said anything about money?


So spare us what you think it is, and answer the questions
Who said anything about money?
And do you want to bet or not? lol :mrgreen:
 
Thunder said:
im not interested in playing childish games with you.
Click to expand...
iLOL in a roar!
It is not childish to bet.

But that is ok, no one is going to make you. mmmkay?
 
Thunder said:
its childish & pathetic to want to bet over this serious issue.
Click to expand...
No it isn't.
It is far, far less than, "childish & pathetic". lol
It isn't even on par with your repeated denials of Zimmerman's injuries being consistent with his account.


Thunder said:
find someone else to play with you.
Click to expand...
iLOL in a large roar!
Stop replying. It is that easy. :mrgreen:
 
Thunder said:
, as it is even lower than childish & pathetic
Click to expand...
Hardly!
It isn't even on par with your repeated denials of Zimmerman's injuries being consistent with his account.
 
Last edited:
Thunder said:
it is disgusting & pathetic that you want to turn this into a money-making opportunity.

it shows how little respect you have for this event.
Click to expand...

Get real...its all about money

The prosecution in cahoots with, the judge give Z a one million dollar bond

The Martin family hoping for a conviction...for what? Justice...nope. Its lawsuits for millions

Z goes free....He also will let rip lawsuits for millions plus book deals, movies, interviews, etc


Yup, The big goal is money and everyone wants a piece of the pie
 
Thunder said:
again, I didn't see the video of the incident, so its kinda hard to say if his so-called fear was reasonable or not.
Click to expand...

This is called "reasonable doubt". This is why the prosecution has a tough case ahead.
 
Excon said:
And yet the odds are in favor of a conviction. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

I don't know about that. The trial should be interesting. I hope it's NOT held in open court.
 
Thunder said:
yes, for GZ. he's already raised how much $$$$?

enough to pay off lots of bills for tvs and other crap that's unrelated to his legal troubles.
Click to expand...
But related to daily living expenses. lol





Let me ask you...
You know that bus monitor who was teased and ended up getting half a mil for vacation.
Are you going to demand that she spend it all on vacation? :doh
 
Thunder said:
buying big screen tvs....is not daily living expenses.

lol!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
iLOL
Is that what he bought?

Or is that what he paid off as a daily living expense?


And if it was specifically went out and purchased, do you know if it was because they didn't have a Television, or perhaps they were replacing a defective one?
Do you know?
No you do not know. You just want to make accusations to demean Zimmerman in the hopes that it sticks.

It is your bias showing.
 
Thunder said:
you call the medical report from Zimmerman's OWN doctor, a lie...and yet accuse others of bias.

:lamo
Click to expand...
There you go starting with your false accusations again. Figures!
You are lying, and showing your clear bias in doing so.
I have not said the report is lying.

And unlike you, I am not confused between a PA and a Doctor.


The images show contusions. Period.
What you don't seem to understand that the lack of the Med Report not mentioning them means nothing. We have visuals.
 
Excon said:
.... What you don't seem to understand that the lack of the Med Report not mentioning them means nothing. We have visuals.
Click to expand...

so, Excon claims that audio experts are meaningless, as he has his own ears.

you say the medical report is meaningless, as you have your own eyes.

wow. just wow.
 
Thunder said:
so, Excon claims that audio experts are meaningless, as he has his own ears.

you say the medical report is meaningless, as you have your own eyes.

wow. just wow.
Click to expand...
Wow is right.

Just more dishonesty on your behalf.

I said not mentioning the contusions in the Medical report, means nothing. Not that the Medical report is meaningless.
That is your ridiculous spin and dishonesty!

Secondly those audio reports are meaningless. The supposed experts discredit their own analysis. They did not have what they themselves say is needed to make a proper analysis. Duh!
And apparently the retired FBI analysis agrees, with his analysis being inconclusive. Duh!

I can not help it if you do not like that, but it is what it is.

But because those supposed analysis, from supposed experts, agree with your bias, you glom onto them as if they mean something. When clearly they mean squat. lol
 
Excon said:
...Secondly those audio reports are meaningless. The supposed experts discredit their own analysis....
Click to expand...

holy crap, your bias is thick as tar.

the audio experts said that Zimmerman said "punks".

and what did Zimmerman lawyer say? he agreed, and said that Zimmerman said "punks".

your comments on this issue are unbelievable.
 
Thunder said:
holy crap, your bias is thick as tar.

the audio experts said that Zimmerman said "punks".

and what did Zimmerman lawyer say? he agreed, and said that Zimmerman said "punks".

your comments on this issue are unbelievable.
Click to expand...
More games, huh?
I never said that analysis was meaningless, did I?

And I am pretty sure you know that, and was referring to what I said was meaningless, the analysis of the screams.

And by my reference to the retired FBI agent's analysis, you obviously knew exactly what was being spoken to.
You are doing nothing but playing silly games because you do not have a leg to stand on to support your preconceived and biased narrative.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom