It's not so much a theory as a demonstrable fact, but what is true is that the "official one", as you put it, is a lie.
Some exact details will never be known, but it's very clear that the official story is a bright and shining lie, to borrow from decades past.
It is near dead - a couple of live threads for medium level discussion. No serious stuff for at least a year. Mostly trolling and "counter trolling" which is not my scene. The fun here is a couple of new trolls and one gameplayer to watch and occasionally carve up in little pieces. In fact the first "big and serious" post I made here was the OP to the "Inevitability" thread. I trialled it on JREF with one (the #3 rank current) of the regular trolls who occasionally makes reasonable comments. I tend to apply the two posts rule when trolls slip up and say something sensible. It's very rare for the troll to follow through with a reasoned "come back". So little different to here. I don't go much for describing trolls as truthers over there. The behaviours are easily distinguished. And there or here I tend to avoid describing the person for obvious reasons....I'm still a moderator/lawyer at heart from a couple of previous lives.
Yes. His specific style is that he posts a shotgun blast of debunker aside truisms without regard to what the truther/troll actually said. He has a collection of standard "boiler plate" segments of response. So typically responds with 6-8 points which are usually irrelevant to the T/T's claim. Maybe one or two points which are relevant but no guarantee. Then when it is aircraft ops he fires the full broadside of technically spot on stuff.
Yes. His politics is to the right of mine - but then I'm AU so most US politics is "right" by AU standards. "Social" and words derived from it are not automatically judged to be swear words in AU.Id probably llike him
I didn't put words in your mouth, and I don't understand what "blatant lord" means.