• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is there any way to cure a truther?[W:2707]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

mike2810 said:
So what is your evidence of a nuclear device was used.

HD, I would say what I really think about your word game, but I would most likely get thread banned.

You are seem to say a lot without producing evidence. You seem to like to throw insults.

So you are saying Jones is lying in his paper that nukes were not used. Are you are saying his methods and reasons are flawed.

Start by trying to post the information you must have read or seen that lead you to the probable use of nukes. Or are you going to say you looked at the vids and came up with that conclusion all by yourself?
Click to expand...

Betcha ya never thought there would come a time when you would be defending Jones, eh? ;)
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Henry David said:
Betcha ya never thought there would come a time when you would be defending Jones, eh? ;)
Click to expand...

and you don't know me, I just disagree on his thermite and CD conclusions.

and you didn't answer my questions. Now who is avoiding, HD?
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

What question are you talking about Mike? How do I know a nuke was used?

Because so many of the facts and evidence suggest it, that's why. Dripping skins, lateral ejection of massive pieces, EMP, calcined and pulverized concrete, melted tires out on the street, huge girders twisted like pretzels, traces of the by-products of nuclear reactions, sicknesses on a massive scale consistent with other nuclear events such as Hiroshima and Chernobyl.

How much more do you need Mike? A signed confession by Dubya? :lol:
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Henry David said:
What question are you talking about Mike? How do I know a nuke was used?

Because so many of the facts and evidence suggest it, that's why. Dripping skins, lateral ejection of massive pieces, EMP, calcined and pulverized concrete, melted tires out on the street, huge girders twisted like pretzels, traces of the by-products of nuclear reactions, sicknesses on a massive scale consistent with other nuclear events such as Hiroshima and Chernobyl.

How much more do you need Mike? A signed confession by Dubya? :lol:
Click to expand...


"So you are saying Jones is lying in his paper that nukes were not used. Are you are saying his methods and reasons are flawed."
guess you can't figure out what is posted.

What I want is for you to provide where you got your information so we all can review it.

Amazing you cannot think of any other explanation except a nanothermite and followed up by a mini nuke.
I can see you set in your opinion. Nothing will change it. Got it.
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Quag said:
yes youtube is about the level of your education when it comes to physics.,
Click to expand...

So rather than Rebuttal, I get a judgement ...... what?
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Menard_K said:
So rather than Rebuttal, I get a judgement ...... what?
Click to expand...

MK, many of us are tired of linking to sites that answers your and others questions. Hence the "judgement".
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

mike2810 said:
MK, many of us are tired of linking to sites that answers your and others questions. Hence the "judgement".
Click to expand...

Unfortunately the "rebuttals" by other web-sites being weak in nature
and the fact that people do not seem to have a grasp of the probabilities
involved, that is most of what was presented as fact for 9/11/2001
has a VERY low probability of actually happening exactly as it is alleged to have happened.
oops!
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Menard_K said:
So rather than Rebuttal, I get a judgement ...... what?
Click to expand...

It has been explained to you and instead of trying to understand you post a youtube video showing that you are unwilling/unable to learn.
What else is there to say but what I have said all along
Just because YOU do not understand does not make it impossible.
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Menard_K said:
Unfortunately the "rebuttals" by other web-sites being weak in nature
and the fact that people do not seem to have a grasp of the probabilities
involved, that is most of what was presented as fact for 9/11/2001
has a VERY low probability of actually happening exactly as it is alleged to have happened.
oops!
Click to expand...

Yes you seem to be totally unable to grasp the incredibly low possibility that your fantasy of no planes could be true it is so low in fact that it really is impossible.
The only reasonable probable explanation and the only logical one is that 4 planes were hijacked on 911 and crashed. Every other idea posted by truthers is just pure fantasy
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

mike2810 said:
"So you are saying Jones is lying in his paper that nukes were not used. Are you are saying his methods and reasons are flawed."
guess you can't figure out what is posted.

What I want is for you to provide where you got your information so we all can review it.

Amazing you cannot think of any other explanation except a nanothermite and followed up by a mini nuke.
I can see you set in your opinion. Nothing will change it. Got it.
Click to expand...

I thought I already answered that Mike.

Prager's book, which you refuse to read. You prefer to judge a book by its cover, rather than actually reading it. But you are consistent in that regard, as you prefer some authoritarian figure in the government to tell you how to think and what to think.

Prager's book is full of references and footnotes. If you were not so incurious, you would read it, but that's not how you roll. No problem. :peace
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Menard_K said:
Unfortunately the "rebuttals" by other web-sites being weak in nature
and the fact that people do not seem to have a grasp of the probabilities
involved, that is most of what was presented as fact for 9/11/2001
has a VERY low probability of actually happening exactly as it is alleged to have happened.
oops!
Click to expand...

Care to share your math.
Lets see how you came up with the low probability.
Were you not the one who does not like to go into details? ie. don't care what type of explosives.
Interesting you keep coming up with well its was low probability.

Of course you won't share, because you have nothing.
Interesting how you dis the work of so many who disagree with you. That is a high probability it will continue.

I will grant you one fact. Terrorist attacks against the US is a low occurring ievent in the US. Though it does happen.
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Henry David said:
I thought I already answered that Mike.

Prager's book, which you refuse to read. You prefer to judge a book by its cover, rather than actually reading it. But you are consistent in that regard, as you prefer some authoritarian figure in the government to tell you how to think and what to think.

Prager's book is full of references and footnotes. If you were not so incurious, you would read it, but that's not how you roll. No problem. :peace
Click to expand...

Granted I didn't read the book Read the VToday article, I also have searched Google for his articles/papers.
See you continue to automatically accuse someone of not researching.

So you are saying Jones has lied about Prager. Got it.
and no you didn't directly say that, but connecting the dots. you have.
Why do I say this. Because Jones flat out says no nukes where used. Your thoughts that don't rule out thermite and nukes use does not hold up to what Jones has written.

So just like a "truther" , you make assumptions without any backing.

Why didn't I read Pragers book. Its not in the library, and I have no desire to spend my money on his book.
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

mike2810 said:
Granted I didn't read the book Read the VToday article, I also have searched Google for his articles/papers.
See you continue to automatically accuse someone of not researching.

So you are saying Jones has lied about Prager. Got it.
and no you didn't directly say that, but connecting the dots. you have.
Why do I say this. Because Jones flat out says no nukes where used. Your thoughts that don't rule out thermite and nukes use does not hold up to what Jones has written.

So just like a "truther" , you make assumptions without any backing.

Why didn't I read Pragers book. Its not in the library, and I have no desire to spend my money on his book.
Click to expand...

I can relate--I hate reading on the computer monitor. If it had been a regular book I would have finished it weeks ago. As it is, I still have about 50 'pages' to go.

No Mike, I didn't say Jones lied about Prager. I have not read Jones say anything at all about Prager, but then I haven't read anything at all Jones has written in probably 2 years.

What I said is that Prager suggests that Jones is a disinfo agent. He suggests that Jones introduced the thermite issue SO THAT the conversations amongst the troofers would be steered away from nuclear and towards thermite.

He claims that the chain of custody of the dust examined by Jones is suspect. I have no opinion, but it seems plausible.

My guess is that thermite could have had a valid and precise function in the demolition. I'm no expert, but it seems that the cutting of steel pieces by thermite could have served a very good purpose.

But I've also known for some years now that thermite has no explosive properties, or minimal. It is incendiary, but not explosive.

Thus thermite in combination with jetfuel and gravity could not possibly have driven those pieces horizontally into the Amex Building.

Either C4 or nuclear are the best candidates for that, and all the rest of the evidence strongly suggests nuclear.

That Jones has done much work and written papers about nuclear science and technology makes it even more suspicious that he might have been a disinfo agent all along. :confused:
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Henry David said:
I can relate--I hate reading on the computer monitor. If it had been a regular book I would have finished it weeks ago. As it is, I still have about 50 'pages' to go.

No Mike, I didn't say Jones lied about Prager. I have not read Jones say anything at all about Prager, but then I haven't read anything at all Jones has written in probably 2 years.

What I said is that Prager suggests that Jones is a disinfo agent. He suggests that Jones introduced the thermite issue SO THAT the conversations amongst the troofers would be steered away from nuclear and towards thermite.

He claims that the chain of custody of the dust examined by Jones is suspect. I have no opinion, but it seems plausible.

My guess is that thermite could have had a valid and precise function in the demolition. I'm no expert, but it seems that the cutting of steel pieces by thermite could have served a very good purpose.

But I've also known for some years now that thermite has no explosive properties, or minimal. It is incendiary, but not explosive.

Thus thermite in combination with jetfuel and gravity could not possibly have driven those pieces horizontally into the Amex Building.

Either C4 or nuclear are the best candidates for that, and all the rest of the evidence strongly suggests nuclear.

That Jones has done much work and written papers about nuclear science and technology makes it even more suspicious that he might have been a disinfo agent all along. :confused:
Click to expand...

About as much chance of there being mini-nukes as it is that this was all done by aliens using the flux capacitor.
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Quag said:
About as much chance of there being mini-nukes as it is that this was all done by aliens using the flux capacitor.
Click to expand...

I DO know something about thermite. We use it in underwater cutting.
Thermite is iron and aluminum burning together in oxygen and is 10,000 degrees F.

You can cut steel and concrete like butter with it.

It could also simply melt the underpinnings of a building allowing the building to fall straight down.

possible. can. Could. A long way from "DID"!
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

yobarnacle said:
I DO know something about thermite. We use it in underwater cutting.
Thermite is iron and aluminum burning together in oxygen and is 10,000 degrees F.

You can cut steel and concrete like butter with it.

It could also simply melt the underpinnings of a building allowing the building to fall straight down.

possible. can. Could. A long way from "DID"!
Click to expand...

Just as it is possible it was space aliens.
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

OscarB63 said:
I tend to think it was the cling-ons from uranus
Click to expand...

Nah couldn't be them they never venture past the rings of Uranus unless forcibly pried. Very stubborn that way they are
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Quag said:
Just as it is possible it was space aliens.
Click to expand...

The space aliens bit is on the same level of probability as the "progressive collapse" theory.

oh well ....
 
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Menard_K said:
The space aliens bit is on the same level of probability as the "progressive collapse" theory.

oh well ....
Click to expand...

No it is slightly more probable than the no plane fantasy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom