• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is there any way to cure a truther?[W:2707]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sadling said:
We all know what you meant with the caption below that car-lot pic. It's a little late for back-peddling.
Click to expand...

*raises eyebrow*

"Back-peddling"?

Please, anybody here that has seen my posts in here for many years now: do any of you think I was seriously implying that there was no debris at those crash sites?
 
Oozlefinch said:
*raises eyebrow*

"Back-peddling"?

Please, anybody here that has seen my posts in here for many years now: do any of you think I was seriously implying that there was no debris at those crash sites?
Click to expand...

Give it up Oozzle. You attempted to use the DC-8 Crash in a comparison to the "UA93" crash. When pointed out that there were in fact large pieces of wreckage at the DC-8 crash (in conflict with the "UA93" crash site)... you back peddled.

Readers can read for themselves over the past few pages.

Oozle, I know you are former military and you would have a huge inner personal conflict if you question authority based on the facts. But keep in mind many in my signature have much more military experience than you and have learned from history, specifically the Nuremberg trials where "I was just following orders" is not an excuse.
 
Oozlefinch said:
Sarcasm, like most forms of humor, are completely lost on those with mental conditions that can not separate fact from fantasy.
Click to expand...


space ..... the final frontier .......






or something ........................................
 
PilotsForTruth said:
Are you saying that "Oozlefinch" postings in the above link(s) are similar to the "UA93" crash site as proposed by "Oozlefinch"
Click to expand...

Nope.

Simply answering this question: Do any of you think I was seriously implying that there was no debris at those crash sites?
With this: No, you weren't.

Fallen.
 
PilotsForTruth said:
No, that is a photograph of a rusted out mess of metal which obviously was posed for a photo-op next to a backhoe bucket.... somewhere.

You were told that is the engine from "Flight 93".

This is what the engine looks like in real life....

Of course, it won't look like that after "impact", but surely it won't look like a rusted out mess of metal which is the fraction of the size of a backhoe bucket. Perhaps this is why none of the 9/11 Aircraft were never positively identified?

By the way, the 757 has two engines. Where is the photo of the other "engine"?
Click to expand...

Got that from 911 truth? 911 truth has no clue what an engine looks like in a 487.5 knot impact. It is Flight 93's engine, to say otherwise is nonsense. That is exactly where Flight 93 crashed, anyone can get the radar data to prove it. Of course now comes the McVeigh like constitution nonsense, and all the FAA, NTSB, USAF and government are liars, giving a pass to 19 buddies of 911 truth. Let the woo

Radar proves it is 93, and so does the FDR found in the same impact area. Facts and evidence win beat talk.

A real engine from 93, and you say no. It is clearly an engine from 93, and no one can prove otherwise. How is the 11.2 g stuff going?
 
Fallenangel said:
Nope.

Simply answering this question: Do any of you think I was seriously implying that there was no debris at those crash sites?
With this: No, you weren't.

Fallen.
Click to expand...

So you haven't viewed this post made by "Oozlefinch"?
http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...cure-truther-w-2707-a-452.html#post1062737229

Where he specifically attempts to equate the DC-8 crash to the "UA93" crash when he says "Wow, where are the planes? This is just proof it is all a conspiracy!"

And then back-peddled when in fact large pieces of wreckage were photographed at the DC-8 crash site?

Do you have any photographs of large pieces of wreckage at the "UA93" crash site? Any positive identification of those parts?
 
PilotsForTruth said:
So you haven't viewed this post made by "Oozlefinch"?
http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...cure-truther-w-2707-a-452.html#post1062737229

Where he specifically attempts to equate the DC-8 crash to the "UA93" crash when he says "Wow, where are the planes? This is just proof it is all a conspiracy!"

And then back-peddled when in fact large pieces of wreckage were photographed at the DC-8 crash site?
Click to expand...

Actually, I did see his post, that is why I answered the following question:

Do any of you think I was seriously implying that there was no debris at those crash sites?
With: No, you weren't.

PilotsForTruth said:
Do you have any photographs of large pieces of wreckage at the "UA93" crash site? Any positive identification of those parts?
Click to expand...

Huh?

Fallen.
 
Fallenangel said:
Actually, I did see his post
Click to expand...

Yeah, clearly you didn't. That is why I sourced it twice for you.

So, after you have seen his post, do you now agree with "Oozlefinch" when he equates the "UA93" crash with the following crash?

Onesliceshort said:
Here are images of the same DC8 (Fine Air Flight 101)

Fine%20Air%20101.JPG


6a3p.jpg


I'm sure the original poster would have found them if he had wanted to :roll:
Click to expand...
 
Fallenangel said:
Nope.

Simply answering this question: Do any of you think I was seriously implying that there was no debris at those crash sites?
With this: No, you weren't.

Fallen.
Click to expand...

Wow, did I even say anything or post anything about Flight 93 in the first place?

*ponders*

No, actually I did not mention it at all. Not a single word, I just put up some pictures I thought were interesting of crashes with little to no obvious aircraft debris.

Nothing more, and nothing less.

A quick lesson to those in here who may not have had much contact with me. I often make heavy use of irony and sarcasm. This is almost never directed at a specific individual, it is made in general. And it is kind of like my use of "Myopia" as a fictional country, not intended to be aimed at any particular individual, just a general statement.

So if anybody is taking these statements as an attack by me, then you really need to rethink how you view the world. Because everything is not about you. Any negative or sarcastic or joking comment made by myself (or anybody else) is not necessarily intended for you or anybody else.

So relax, you are not the center of the world. And just remember:

You are a fluke of the Universe.
You have no right to be here.
And whether you can hear it or not,
The Universe is laughing behind your back.
 
PilotsForTruth said:
Yeah, clearly you didn't. That is why I sourced it twice for you.

So, after you have seen his post, do you now agree with "Oozlefinch" when he equates the "UA93" crash with the following crash?

http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...cure-truther-w-2707-a-454.html#post1062740547
Click to expand...

Yeah, I did see his post.

Why is it so hard for you to understand, I don't agree with anything here, including not with your "Yes... he was.. and he was wrong."

There was a question posed by Oozlefinch: Do any of you think I was seriously implying that there was no debris at those crash sites?
After looking at his post I answered it with: No, you weren't.

It is very simple.

Fallen.
 
Last edited:
Fallenangel said:
Click to expand...

Yep... those are "Truthers" too.

(a hint for the readers... see two posts above... and then realize who began the "name-calling".)

Fallen.
Click to expand...

Name-calling? No, it is fact. You are a cheerleader for "Oozlefinch", mainly due to the fact you have evaded and ignored this question in post 4563 above.

So, after you have seen his post, do you now agree with "Oozlefinch" when he equates the "UA93" crash with the following crash?
 
PilotsForTruth said:
Name-calling? No, it is fact. You are a cheerleader for "Oozlefinch", mainly due to the fact you have evaded and ignored this question in post 4563 above.

So, after you have seen his post, do you now agree with "Oozlefinch" when he equates the "UA93" crash with the following crash?
Click to expand...


It is a fact that you don't get it.

I've seen his post, and to his question: Do any of you think I was seriously implying that there was no debris at those crash sites?
I answered: No, you weren't.

You might answer it differently, think differently, think he equated something, etc...I do not think so, that is why I answered his question as I answered it.

It is very simple.

Fallen.
 
When confronted with the fact that there was no wreckage at the Shanksville crash site, Oozlefinch posted a pick of an auction car-lot where a DC-8 crashed. You saw it, and you saw the caption he placed beneath that pick. Tell me, Fallenangel, what do you suppose he meant by that?
 
Last edited:
Sadling said:
When confronted with the fact that there was no wreckage at the Shanksville crash site, Oozlefinch posted a pick of an auction car-lot where a DC-8 crashed. You saw it, and you saw the caption he place beneath that pick. Tell me, Fallenangel, what do you suppose he meant by that?
Click to expand...

I do not know what he exactly meant by that.

The caption was: "Wow, where are the planes? This is just proof it is all a conspiracy!"
And his question regarding it was: Do any of you think I was seriously implying that there was no debris at those crash sites?
I answered: No, you weren't.

As I've written above you might think differently, think he equated something, etc...I do not think so, that is why I answered his question as I answered it.

It is very simple.

Fallen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom