There are lots of legal controlled demolitions where standard high explosives like C-4 are used with no incendiaries involved. No fires in the rubble, and the dust is not hot.
To go one step further we can look at Verinage demolitions, where no charges of any kind are used, just hydraulic rams to break the columns on a couple of stories. No fires in the rubble, and the dust is not hot.
Of course, Mike and the others denying controlled demolition of the WTC buildings would try to point to the fires on the few upper floors as the reason for all of the heat, but that can be shown to be incorrect as the dust would have smothered the fires and all of the interface with cooler material during the collapse would have absorbed the heat from the relatively small amount of hot material. They are just blowing smoke here, literally. They have no answer for the hot dust, molten metal, and ignited cars that would not involve incendiary use and a conspiracy, other than what we were told, being behind the destruction of the buildings.
They really have a hard time with the lack of deceleration in WTC 1, and the free fall acceleration of WTC 7 proving controlled demolition and don't seem to want to discuss those things too much.
