- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
- Messages
- 3,412
- Reaction score
- 8
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Yes, there is going to be some voter indescrepencies, but not in the porportion of these. There's just to many discrepencies in the 2000 election not to notice. The fact is W hijacked definetly the 2000 election, and if he fails to get impeached by '08, he'll go down in history as one of the most fraudulent Presidents ever.
First off, I don't pay attention to people the likes of Michael Moore. I have an inkling that you, on the other hand, listen constantly to Rush Limbaugh's idiotic soundbytes. Second of all, ideally, after 9/11 if George Bush, who claims he reads from the good book every morning, as well as falsely claims to be Christian, if he really followed the Christ, like he so aptly phrases it, would remember the famous words of Christian wisdom from Jesus: "Love your enemies". In a utopian, enlightened world, W would'nt have initiated a war, but by loving his enemies, would have given more support to Palestinians, received more Palestinian refugees, withdrew the military from SA, canceled the economic sanctions against Iraq (responsible for over 500,000 deaths), ask Israel to destroy their WMDs, and finally, gave as much money as it gives to Israel to Arab countries in a more balanced way. This action would have brought a wave of peace which would have dramatically lowered the number of potential terrorists.
Do I have the right to label him a fanatic? C'mon it's a 2-way street here. You can't have it one way, and not the other.
Ok, so they did get their weapons then, so before you said it is Unacceptable for any Middle-Eastern country to obtain WMDs, now you are attempting to justify them having them? I'm confused here.
Originally posted by KevinWan
Gore would of wimped out on 9/11. Obvious the President was pretty darn smart in ordering the downing of all aircraft in the U.S. His actions on 9/11 were superior, don't let Michael Moore lie to you otherwise.
First off, I don't pay attention to people the likes of Michael Moore. I have an inkling that you, on the other hand, listen constantly to Rush Limbaugh's idiotic soundbytes. Second of all, ideally, after 9/11 if George Bush, who claims he reads from the good book every morning, as well as falsely claims to be Christian, if he really followed the Christ, like he so aptly phrases it, would remember the famous words of Christian wisdom from Jesus: "Love your enemies". In a utopian, enlightened world, W would'nt have initiated a war, but by loving his enemies, would have given more support to Palestinians, received more Palestinian refugees, withdrew the military from SA, canceled the economic sanctions against Iraq (responsible for over 500,000 deaths), ask Israel to destroy their WMDs, and finally, gave as much money as it gives to Israel to Arab countries in a more balanced way. This action would have brought a wave of peace which would have dramatically lowered the number of potential terrorists.
Who cares if the President uses biblical references in his speech. Hate to break it to ya, but the vast majority of our country believes in some type of God. If hes such a darn fanatic... why hasn't he established Christianity as the state religion? If hes such a fanatic, why do you currently have to right to reject the existence of almighty God????
Do I have the right to label him a fanatic? C'mon it's a 2-way street here. You can't have it one way, and not the other.
Israel, India and Pakistan got their weapons in the pre-9/11 world. Theres a significant difference. Since when has Israel or India threatened our country, or supported Islamic terrorism?? Maybe Pakistan has, but was Bush around when they got their WMDs???
Saudi Arabia certainly has use for their weapons. Remeber the Gulf War?? Saddam would have invaded them had Bush Sr. not confronted him. Ever hear of Iran? Its just like we have weapons left over that secured us in the Cold War... they've got left over weapons too.
Now please, stop crying fowl over the two-time electoral victories of President Bush
Ok, so they did get their weapons then, so before you said it is Unacceptable for any Middle-Eastern country to obtain WMDs, now you are attempting to justify them having them? I'm confused here.
Last edited: