Is the GOP anti-science?

[PeteEU]

Yes.. Read any thread on this board involving clean energy or new tech...

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk

 

[Moderate Right]

Global warming can be reversed. AOC is an aberration.

Please link to the scientific facts that show we can decrease global temperatures and don't waste your time posting links only showing that we can decrease the rate of the increases. Do you have that science or are you a science denier?

 

[Moderate Right]

AIC is a politician and may exaggerate to make a point. It does not disprove climate change science.

Please show me the climate change science that shows we can decrease global temperatures, and don't waste my time by proving that all we can do is decrease the rate of increases. Do you have the science or are you a science denier? Why is it you guys can't be honest about the science? Why do you have to deny the science that shows that no matter what we do, global temps will still rise?

 

[Sabre]

Yes……..well any science that goes against their already held beliefs. Many in the GOP are closed minded, whereas most in the democrat party are open minded. Democrats are more willing to change their mind about things, therefore they are able to believe in science more easily.

:lamo:lamo:lamo :funny :joke:

 

[Threegoofs]

Please show me the climate change science that shows we can decrease global temperatures, and don't waste my time by proving that all we can do is decrease the rate of increases. Do you have the science or are you a science denier? Why is it you guys can't be honest about the science? Why do you have to deny the science that shows that no matter what we do, global temps will still rise?

You seem confused.

 

[Moderate Right]

You seem confused.

How so? Why don't you unconfuse me by posting proof that we can actually decrease global temps, not just decrease the rising rate of global temps. Can you do it or are you a science denier?

 

[Threegoofs]

How so? Why don't you unconfuse me by posting proof that we can actually decrease global temps, not just decrease the rising rate of global temps. Can you do it or are you a science denier?

I’m guessing my efforts would be futile. Because....you.

And I don’t think anyone has said we will be decreasing temperatures, although it’s certainly theoretically possible we could do it with bioengineering.

 

[Moderate Right]

I’m guessing my efforts would be futile. Because....you.

And I don’t think anyone has said we will be decreasing temperatures, although it’s certainly theoretically possible we could do it with bioengineering.

Why don't you just admit that you can't do it? I mean, that's all I want is for you guys to be honest with the discussion and admit that no matter what we do, global temps will still rise. Is that really that hard? That's the science! If you deny it then it is YOU who are the deniers.

 

[OldFatGuy]

Please link to the scientific facts that show we can decrease global temperatures and don't waste your time posting links only showing that we can decrease the rate of the increases. Do you have that science or are you a science denier?

I'm not playing this game with you. It stops now. You bore me.

 

[Threegoofs]

Why don't you just admit that you can't do it? I mean, that's all I want is for you guys to be honest with the discussion and admit that no matter what we do, global temps will still rise. Is that really that hard? That's the science! If you deny it then it is YOU who are the deniers.

You’re confused.

Not a real surprise, tbh.

 

[Moderate Right]

I'm not playing this game with you. It stops now. You bore me.

It's obvious why you want to stop. You deny the science. You are a science denier.

 

[Moderate Right]

You’re confused.

Not a real surprise, tbh.

I'm not confused at all. As I predicted, you can't find even one link to prove we can actually decrease global temps. In other words, you are a science denier.

 

[Threegoofs]

I'm not confused at all. As I predicted, you can't find even one link to prove we can actually decrease global temps. In other words, you are a science denier.

True. You may not be confused, and are just trolling.

 

[Moderate Right]

True. You may not be confused, and are just trolling.

I'm still waiting for you science deniers to own up to the science which proves that no matter what we do, global temps will still rise. Do you agree with the science or do you deny the science? It's a simple question.

 

[eohrnberger]

No more than Democrats are pro illegal, or anti capitalist.


Sure, there are some that are, but lets be careful with the broad brush.

Very much true.

It s a Venn diagram, where there are multiple sets which overlap each other. No matter how often you divide the main population into sets, there's a science and anti-science sub set within each of those sets.

 

[ataraxia]

Please show me the climate change science that shows we can decrease global temperatures, and don't waste my time by proving that all we can do is decrease the rate of increases. Do you have the science or are you a science denier? Why is it you guys can't be honest about the science? Why do you have to deny the science that shows that no matter what we do, global temps will still rise?

Wait what? If a smoker can't stop smoking, would it help them if they try to at least cut back a little ? Or is it OK to keep smoking like a chimney just because they can't stop?

 

[Threegoofs]

I'm still waiting for you science deniers to own up to the science which proves that no matter what we do, global temps will still rise. Do you agree with the science or do you deny the science? It's a simple question.

[emoji849]

 

[Obscurity]

I'd wager the leadership and majority of elected GOP officials are not anti-science. I believe they use it as a football to garner support from their base.
Sort of like how most of them would advocate their mistresses get an abortion, but they go out and say they're anti abortion rights.

 

[ludin]

Is the GOP anti-science?

Or is the GOP using the same arguments they use for religion? Pick and choose what they believe. They mostly don't follow the teaching of jesus and they deny climate change.

Try not to be too outrageous in your denials.

please do not confuse the theory of global warming to climate change.

they are not the same thing. they are completely different.

 

[Sampson Simpson]

The GOP is anti- anything that destroys their dumb, incorrect worldview. Science is only good when it can be used to support their position (which is like never) but biased and wrong when it doesn't. We have seen this hypocrisy play out over and over and over and over again.

They are just dishonest assholes, essentially

 

[Obscurity]

please do not confuse the theory of global warming to climate change.

they are not the same thing. they are completely different.

Here's the thing. The entire earth is a chemical system. Injecting new chemicals or old chemicals on a mass scale is bound to alter the atmosphere of this system, as the overwhelmig, and it is overwhelming, number of scientists have found.

Human activity is fueling climate change, making it worse, and we can reproduce these results in tests.

The fatalistic, nihilistic, and irresponsible actions of the GOP in waging a disinformation war about this is having drastic consequences for our environment.

It all goes back to, as usual with conservatives, a judeo-christiancentric worldview, where they believe they have dominion over the land, sea and sky and the animals therein.

They do not.

This holy book has poisoned half this country with its vacuous and inane nonsense and must be utterly abolished, 1st amendment be damned.

 

[bongsaway]

please do not confuse the theory of global warming to climate change.

they are not the same thing. they are completely different.

I don't use the term global warming, climate change is more accurate.

 

[ludin]

Here's the thing. The entire earth is a chemical system. Injecting new chemicals or old chemicals on a mass scale is bound to alter the atmosphere of this system, as the overwhelmig, and it is overwhelming, number of scientists have found.

Human activity is fueling climate change, making it worse, and we can reproduce these results in tests.

it has no where near the impact that they make it out to be.
if it did do you not realize we should have been dead like 5 years ago due to
their "science" calculations?

The fatalistic, nihilistic, and irresponsible actions of the GOP in waging a disinformation war about this is having drastic consequences for our environment.

The only misinformation is being spread by zealots. The fact is that yes we can manage the environment and that it is always a good idea to look into better
more healthier things for the environment. what is not true is the sky is falling and we are all doomed zealotry that is being spouted.

It all goes back to, as usual with conservatives, a judeo-christiancentric worldview, where they believe they have dominion over the land, sea and sky and the animals therein.
They do not.
This holy book has poisoned half this country with its vacuous and inane nonsense and must be utterly abolished, 1st amendment be damned.

Actually we do have dominion over the earth. The other fact is that there are some things that are outside our control.
Global warming is a theory.

Climate change is not global warming and climate change is going to happen whether you want it too or not.
that is a fact. it is documented scientifically.

the best bet we can do is to prepare for impacts of that when it does happen.

 

[ludin]

I don't use the term global warming, climate change is more accurate.

No it isn't. what you refer to is global warming not climate change.

Climate change is real and it exists and has existed since the world came into being.
It is how we move from a tropical landscape in antartica
When Antarctica was a tropical paradise | World news | The Guardian

to a frozen wasteland.

do you honestly not think that the earth can go back to that state?
i can tell you now it wasn't SUV's and power plants that got the earth to 1000ppm CO2 levels.
guess what? animals and everything else survived just fine. there is nothing that says earth can't return to that state
either.

your fatalistic predicts are not merited in actual science. the above link is what real science looks like except for the last
part which is more fatalistic nonsense. too bad. he started off pretty good then went stupid.

 

[srexob715]

No it isn't. what you refer to is global warming not climate change.

Climate change is real and it exists and has existed since the world came into being.
It is how we move from a tropical landscape in antartica
When Antarctica was a tropical paradise | World news | The Guardian

to a frozen wasteland.

do you honestly not think that the earth can go back to that state?
i can tell you now it wasn't SUV's and power plants that got the earth to 1000ppm CO2 levels.
guess what? animals and everything else survived just fine. there is nothing that says earth can't return to that state
either.

your fatalistic predicts are not merited in actual science. the above link is what real science looks like except for the last
part which is more fatalistic nonsense. too bad. he started off pretty good then went stupid.

The problem is that science is showing that our climate is warming at rates we have never seen and they coincide with the industrial revolution. No conservative has been able to explain this, hence its the reason progressives have no reason to believe they are correct in their denial.