• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is the GOP anti-science?

it has no where near the impact that they make it out to be.
if it did do you not realize we should have been dead like 5 years ago due to
their "science" calculations?



The only misinformation is being spread by zealots. The fact is that yes we can manage the environment and that it is always a good idea to look into better
more healthier things for the environment. what is not true is the sky is falling and we are all doomed zealotry that is being spouted.



Actually we do have dominion over the earth. The other fact is that there are some things that are outside our control.
Global warming is a theory.

Climate change is not global warming and climate change is going to happen whether you want it too or not.
that is a fact. it is documented scientifically.

the best bet we can do is to prepare for impacts of that when it does happen.

Our actions are having a direct impact on climate change - you can't deny it, science doesn't give a **** about your petrol-gop-donor class denialism.

It's settled science.

As far as dominion - no, we do not. Your holy book doesn't give it to you, for sure.
 
The problem is that science is showing that our climate is warming at rates we have never seen and they coincide with the industrial revolution. No conservative has been able to explain this, hence its the reason progressives have no reason to believe they are correct in their denial.

no it isn't. again according to their science we should have been dead 5 years ago. we aren't. that is the problem with using zealotry with science it often doesn't work out well.

According to an ongoing temperature analysis conducted by scientists at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), the average global temperature on Earth has increased by about 0.8° Celsius (1.4° Fahrenheit) since 1880

what unprecidented rate is that? the earth global average temp has only increase by .8 in 200 years?
that is not uncommon nor is that out of character.

again appeal to emotion fallacies are not arguments they are fallacies for a reason.

also your post doesn't deal with anything that was discussed. the facts are the facts.
Antarctica used to be a tropical paradise. before it became a frozen wasteland.

there is nothing that says it can't do that again.
 
Our actions are having a direct impact on climate change - you can't deny it, science doesn't give a **** about your petrol-gop-donor class denialism.

It's settled science.

As far as dominion - no, we do not. Your holy book doesn't give it to you, for sure.

so you will throw out actual science for zealotry have a nice day.
there is no point in trying to have a rational discussion with an irrational argument that ignores
actual science.

nor is there a point in trying to have a rational discussion when someone refuses to read what is written.
it is just not possible.

your zealotry makes you lose.
sorry but it isn't settled.
 
so you will throw out actual science for zealotry have a nice day.
there is no point in trying to have a rational discussion with an irrational argument that ignores
actual science.

nor is there a point in trying to have a rational discussion when someone refuses to read what is written.
it is just not possible.

your zealotry makes you lose.
sorry but it isn't settled.

The science is settled. Pouring chemicals into the atmosphere has destabilized it. It's settled to an overwhelming amount of scientists.

This is why the GOP and folks like you are ridiculed.
 
so you will throw out actual science for zealotry have a nice day.
there is no point in trying to have a rational discussion with an irrational argument that ignores
actual science.

nor is there a point in trying to have a rational discussion when someone refuses to read what is written.
it is just not possible.

your zealotry makes you lose.
sorry but it isn't settled.

Zealotry, indeed

Scientific opinion on climate change - Wikipedia
 
No it isn't. what you refer to is global warming not climate change.

Climate change is real and it exists and has existed since the world came into being.
It is how we move from a tropical landscape in antartica
When Antarctica was a tropical paradise | World news | The Guardian

to a frozen wasteland.

do you honestly not think that the earth can go back to that state?
i can tell you now it wasn't SUV's and power plants that got the earth to 1000ppm CO2 levels.
guess what? animals and everything else survived just fine. there is nothing that says earth can't return to that state
either.

your fatalistic predicts are not merited in actual science. the above link is what real science looks like except for the last
part which is more fatalistic nonsense. too bad. he started off pretty good then went stupid.

Well thank you for telling me what I mean. One of us is confused. I mean climate change, global climate change. Not global warming because there is also global cooling. Can we agree there? I will go under the idea we agree there. So, with that in mind and from what I can see on the 24/7 global eye and read, I mean global climate change. Conditions everywhere are becoming more extreme. Migrations will become more frequent as land becomes more arid while other places flood. The hurricanes are getting worse, the fires are getting worse and more frequent and the fire season lasts longer. The ice is melting at the poles. All things that are documented if one cares to look objectively.
 
Back
Top Bottom