Is it enough already?

[Gina]

Weissmann, whatever.

I still don't know who you're talking about. I don't see either name, or anything close to it, in our discussion.

 

[apdst]

I still don't know who you're talking about. I don't see either name, or anything close to it, in our discussion.

He's one of Mueller's all star prosecuters. He's the cat that praised Sally Yates. He has a piss poor track record. He has a history of witness threatening, withholding exculpatory evidence, presenting manufactured evidence.

 

[Gina]

He's one of Mueller's all star prosecuters. He's the cat that praised Sally Yates. He has a piss poor track record. He has a history of witness threatening, withholding exculpatory evidence, presenting manufactured evidence.

What's his proper name and provide a link to support your claims against him. We have not discussed him by name yet.

 

[Fiddytree]

I guess I find it absolutely no surprise that yesterday's foes become today's allies simply because both ally and foe share the same madness.

 

[Oborosen]

In my opinion, Mueller and others who spend all of their time trying to undermine the Trump administration should be trying to help make America great again.

Seeing as Mueller is currently proving himself to be more of a loose canon than an actual member of the investigation, not to mention the amount of overreach he is currently getting himself into. I am inclined to agree with you.

 

[Oreo]

In my opinion, Mueller and others who spend all of their time trying to undermine the Trump administration should be trying to help make America great again.

I take it you could care less if Vladimir Putin moved his desk into the Oval Office.

I doubt it bothered you that Republicans spent millions upon millions of tax payers dollars conducting 8 investigations into Benghazi, along with an investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails? I imagine you believe that money was well spent.

Herein lies a lesson for Republicans who are perpetually trying to appease the far right: It’s a fool’s errand. They went to the tea party – and now they’re taking Donald Trump to the prom. Likewise, then-House Speaker John Boehner named the Benghazi committee because activists were dissatisfied that seven previous congressional investigations had failed to uncover major scandal material. Now an eighth has produced more of the same – and the agitators are as agitated as ever. There’s a certain twisted logic to this. The unhinged right starts with the ideologically satisfying answer – President Obama and Hillary Clinton are guilty of horrible Benghazi-related wrongdoing – and then works backwards, looking for “proof” that matches the conclusion. When their ostensible allies fail to tell these activists what they want to hear, they could reevaluate their bogus assumptions, but it’s vastly easier to believe Republicans have let them down.

With Clinton exonerated, conspiracy theorists turn on Trey Gowdy | MSNBC



So welcome to it.

5 Federal Grand Jury indictiments and 2 guilty plea's with more certain to come, says this one has legs that's going to continue--until Trump is GONE.

Republicans have 2 options:
1. Remove Trump and his Russian cohorts asap or
2. Burn down the entire party in 2018--2020 & beyond.

If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi and endless email investigations, it's not hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction & lies when they take over in 2018. You'll also get a great education into what that Emoluments clause in the Constitution is all about, which is also a reason for impeachment if Democrats don't go along with the current setup.
https://www.brookings.edu/research/...xt-meaning-and-application-to-donald-j-trump/

You were warned a thousand times about Trump, now you OWN it.

 

[WCH]

The only ones they pleaded too, and pleas are usually done to prevent being prosecuted for more serious crimes.

They were going to go after these guys families if they didn't cooperate. This is extortion.

 

[apdst]

What's his proper name and provide a link to support your claims against him. We have not discussed him by name yet.

https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/794685

 

[Saboteur]

Its absurd that you all think the President has a Clear Box on his desk like some Mel brooks satire with a big red glowing button under it? I am actually embarrassed to read you saying it....


Please with all respects educate yourself on Nuclear launch https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-nuclear-weapon-launch/

You've never heard of the 'Football'?

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/real-story-football-follows-president-everywhere-180952779/
"Its primary purpose is to confirm the president’s identity, and it allows him to communicate with the National Military Command Center in the Pentagon, which monitors worldwide nuclear threats and can order an instant response. The Football also provides the commander in chief with a simplified menu of nuclear strike options—allowing him to decide, for example, whether to destroy all of America’s enemies in one fell swoop or to limit himself to obliterating only Moscow or Pyongyang or Beijing."

 

[Geoist]

What the hell's the point of the investigation, then?

Because there are crimes that would be committed in the effort to collude.

 

[apdst]

Because there are crimes that would be committed in the effort to collude.

Like I said: launch the investigation, then look for a crime. Thank you for confirming that.

BTW, that's unconstitutional.

 

[ChezC3]

Disappointed that the Trump surrogates aren't allowed to lie to the FBI? Perhaps you'd be happier to just rid us of the curse that is the FBI altogether?

You mean like HRC and hers did and got away with it?

If they've turned into a tool used for political corruption, yes we should abolish and rebuild.

 

[antiquity]

I take it you could care less if Vladimir Putin moved his desk into the Oval Office.

I doubt it bothered you that Republicans spent millions upon millions of tax payers dollars conducting 8 investigations into Benghazi, along with an investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails? I imagine you believe that money was well spent.


With Clinton exonerated, conspiracy theorists turn on Trey Gowdy | MSNBC

View attachment 67225771

So welcome to it.

5 Federal Grand Jury indictiments and 2 guilty plea's with more certain to come, says this one has legs that's going to continue--until Trump is GONE.

Republicans have 2 options:
1. Remove Trump and his Russian cohorts asap or
2. Burn down the entire party in 2018--2020 & beyond.

If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi and endless email investigations, it's not hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction & lies when they take over in 2018. You'll also get a great education into what that Emoluments clause in the Constitution is all about, which is also a reason for impeachment if Democrats don't go along with the current setup.
https://www.brookings.edu/research/...xt-meaning-and-application-to-donald-j-trump/

You were warned a thousand times about Trump, now you OWN it.

Maybe the reason that no indictments were forthcoming is because of the Obama appointed investigators? Just like F&F, IRS probe and Hillary email scandal which were all protected from prosecution by Obama minions.

 

[Geoist]

Like I said: launch the investigation, then look for a crime. Thank you for confirming that.

BTW, that's unconstitutional.

It is not unconstitutional to charge someone for a crime you discovered while investigating another crime. That is a common misconception.

I assume you must think a cop cannot arrest a speedy driver after discovering a dimebag in his/her car.

 

[antiquity]

uhmmm, because the head of the FBI said there was no evidence that she lied to the FBI, and there is no evidence she lied to Congress. Trump lies day in and day out when he repeats his crooked Hillary claim. Fox News too.

Not according to Comey in sworn testimony in from of Congress.

Gowdy, July 7: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received. Was that true?

Comey: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.

 

[antiquity]

It is not unconstitutional to charge someone for a crime you discovered while investigating another crime. That is a common misconception.

I assume you must think a cop cannot arrest a speedy driver after discovering a dimebag in his/her car.

No he can't......Not without a warrant or permission by the accused speeder to do a search for that dimebag and a warrant will not be granted unless the officer has due cause to do a search or get a warrant in the first place.

 

[roughdraft274]

You mean like HRC and hers did and got away with it?

If they've turned into a tool used for political corruption, yes we should abolish and rebuild.

Can you give me the lies they told the FBI? I haven't been able to find any.

 

[JMR]

Not according to Comey in sworn testimony in from of Congress.

Quite selective editing. He went on to say that on those three documents the classified marking was irregular, and might have been missed. So, though the statement was not true, it was not necessarily a lie. She very well could have believed there was nothing classified.

 

[antiquity]

Can you give me the lies they told the FBI? I haven't been able to find any.

This is the definition of a “double standard.”

Peter Strzok interviewed two Hillary aides last year, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, who both gave misleading statements to the FBI, but faced zero legal repercussions for doing so, unlike Michael Flynn, who was also interviewed by Strzok and was later charged with a felony for “lying” to the FBI.

Strzok is also the FBI agent who was removed from Robert Mueller’s witch-hunt of an investigation team, when it was revealed that he sent anti-Trump texts to another member of the team, with whom he was also having an affair.

 

[ChezC3]

Can you give me the lies they told the FBI? I haven't been able to find any.

Clinton Aides Also Lied To Embattled Mueller | The Daily Caller

 

[antiquity]

Quite selective editing. He went on to say that on those three documents the classified marking was irregular, and might have been missed. So, though the statement was not true, it was not necessarily a lie. She very well could have believed there was nothing classified.

LOTFLMAO...thanks for the laughs.

 

[JMR]

LOTFLMAO...thanks for the laughs.

Well of course it's about Hillary so there is no possibility of thinking clearly about what she in fact testified to. Much easier to read and post what suits you. Have a wonderful laugh, it's easier than thinking.

 

[Geoist]

No he can't......Not without a warrant or permission by the accused speeder to do a search for that dimebag and a warrant will not be granted unless the officer has due cause to do a search or get a warrant in the first place.

They only need probable cause to search your car. If they smell it or happen to see it tucked in the side of the seat, guess what?

 

[apdst]

It is not unconstitutional to charge someone for a crime you discovered while investigating another crime. That is a common misconception.

I assume you must think a cop cannot arrest a speedy driver after discovering a dimebag in his/her car.

It is if you went outside the scope of the investigation without probable cause.

A cop that arrests a driver for drugs isn't going to launch an investigation into the driver's financial history looking for tax evasion, or money laundering.

Our system doesn't allow law enforcement to launch investigations without probable cause. It's that simple.

 

[Moderate Right]

In my opinion, Mueller and others who spend all of their time trying to undermine the Trump administration should be trying to help make America great again.

Oops. I voted yes when I wanted to vote no. Caveat: Both sides have spent millions and millions investigating the other side for everything under the sun, mostly all for political reasons. All Congress ever does any more is investigate, investigate, investigate. They do this to make voters think they are working but they aren't. They are in total gridlock. Meanwhile, the government is close to shutting down again.