• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Islam protected by the Constitution?

What a depressing Islamaphobia hate filled topic this thread OP is...

Its called awareness...not Islamophobia. But you call being aware a phobia. Who's the hater? The one who warns of certain tragedy or the one who ignores it until it happens? You liberals don't care what will happen to your grandchildren and how they will be exterminated because of your decisions today. You will be hated by them; despised and rejected!
 
You are aware that slavery has been abolished in almost all of the Muslim world right?

Nope. Not aware of that. Islamic countries make up for the world's largest sex slave trafficking and many Africans are still slaves to their brutal muslim masters. All women are slaves in Islam. In fact, all muslims are slaves to Islam! Living in an Islamic country is such a miserable experience they move away just to save their lives from their own beliefs, only to bring their beliefs with them to the host nation that made them happy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ae2YCiIf4_8
 
A rose by any other name?

You liberals really don't care what happens to Americans, do you? Its like a sickness with you. You defend all things antichrist and persecute all things Christ. Islam is not on your side. Islam is for Islam and no human rights are recognized in Islam. Even the earth itself has no rights in Islam! How much longer will you liberals be so dull minded about this issue? How many more terrorist attacks will it take before you arrive to the conclusion I have arrived to?

There will come a time when every single person in America will wished they had banned every single muslim from the nation. But hopefully under the right leadership we can at least stand a fighting chance against Europe when it comes one big Islamic Empire....complete with all the nuclear weapons of Europe. You people do not see what is going on because none of you understand religion. You all assume its all the same and its not.

Americans being citizens of the US? Or more broadly (& accurately) residents of the New World? And Liberals can be religious, even Christian. I'm sure the concept of Christian is different in its particulars from that held by Fundamentalist Christians, but I'm equally certain that the broad outlines of Christianity are very similar - they have to be, or else they're not Christian.

Just FYI, most Islamic terrorist attacks are upon fellow Islamics - usually of the wrong flavor - Sunni v. Shia, but each grouping also has sectional religious enemies that they may attack on theological grounds.

As far as Muslims in the US - @ the point that that UK colonies (which later became the US) & then the US were importing slaves from Africa, we also imported some Islamics. They kept a low profile, but some of their writings & histories survived. & I'm sure that Liberals in general are aware that religions vary, even if (to Western Civilization eyes), the Koran seems to echo a lot of Torah & New Testament themes.
 
Nope. Not aware of that. Islamic countries make up for the world's largest sex slave trafficking and many Africans are still slaves to their brutal muslim masters. All women are slaves in Islam. In fact, all muslims are slaves to Islam! Living in an Islamic country is such a miserable experience they move away just to save their lives from their own beliefs, only to bring their beliefs with them to the host nation that made them happy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ae2YCiIf4_8


That video...holy boat load of dumb Batman!
:lamo

Ah I see; sex trafficking is something exclusive to Muslim countries now? So Muslims are slaves to Islam like others are to their religious beliefs? Interesting idea you posit; so Muslims flee Islamic countries because they supposedly want to escape it but then practice it in their new host nation. Could it be people weren't fleeing Islam but brutal political regimes?
 
Details, details, details


[
They were treated with equality and dignity in Lebanon and now Lebanon is a muslim country. They are treated with equality and dignity in Israel and look how the Palestinians return the love :roll:
No matter where they go, as history testifies, death and sorrow follow.

Boy you really have faith in your muslim buddies, don't you. Maybe you are trying to say that they might be the source of victory over Christians and conservatives. So you vote for millions of emigrants hoping to raise an army to take over the nation and then you win and its all rainbows and unicorns after that? Do you know anything...anything at all...about Islamic history? If you knew anything then you would know how muslims broke all treaties and alliances with those they allied with in battle. What happened to the Byzantine empire? They trusted muslims. Muhammad already said in a hadith before his death to betray the Byzantine empire. They have made these plans for you and your children and grandchildren. You have got to be one warped individual to entertain Islamic emigration. Islam is a violation of everything our Constitution represents.

Less luck? Less luck? Muslims are conquering Europe! Wise up!

Oh really, is that so? I know of no conservatives who defend mass genocide of Americans. But you apparently are alright with it.

Lebanon now is nearly a failed state. The problems there are more due to UK/French Sykes-Picot treaty, carving up the Ottoman Empire after WWI. The representational structure that France set up for Lebanon's governance was extremely fragile, & it collapsed under sectarian warfare & shifting demographics. Interventions by Syria, Iran (covert), PLO, Hamas, France, US, & Israel haven't helped either.

Islam as a religion isn't a violation of the Constitution. It's the political & cultural aspects of Islam as practiced in very conservative Islamic countries that are problematic in the US, but not because of their religious base, but because some of those Islamic political & cultural aspects are considered crimes in the US, if carried out in the World.

No, it's not that Islam is conquering Europe. It's that Europe's populations are not reproducing enough to keep their birthrates @ even replacement level. Russia & most of Western Europe have suffered from this for quite some time. Islam is simply moving into the vacuum - & sometimes by invitation. The industrialized West still needs workers, & that population is also in decline.

mass genocide is like free gift. You only need one of those words, & in the case of the first phrase, it's genocide. Properly speaking, genocide means everybody of a certain group dies - it's quite beyond mass, & mass as a qualifier actually limits the intent, whereas genocide refers to all members of the specified group.
 
Its called awareness...not Islamophobia. But you call being aware a phobia. Who's the hater? The one who warns of certain tragedy or the one who ignores it until it happens? You liberals don't care what will happen to your grandchildren and how they will be exterminated because of your decisions today. You will be hated by them; despised and rejected!

I don't care because I do hate my yet to be conceived grand children and I certainly don't care about the world after I am dead... as long as I get to feel good about me now is what really matters and your hatred and intolerance is getting in the way of that.
 
Call the question

Lol, While I agree that most of what you said is disturbing and wrong. It is a far cry from persecution.

Please define persecution for us, then. Just out of curiosity, because the discrimination SouthernDemocrat laid out certainly sounds like persecution to me.
 
I don't care because I do hate my yet to be conceived grand children and I certainly don't care about the world after I am dead... as long as I get to feel good about me now is what really matters and your hatred and intolerance is getting in the way of that.

On that note I rest my case.
 
Metaphysical expression is human nature; suppression is low class and authoritarian.
 
I have seen a great many self absorbed liberals on and offline. You might think one would get used of it but its so dark and wicked that its a constant reminder of why we Christians place our faith in Christ. I have studied ancient history for years now. This study covered everything from ancient Sumer up to the present now. In the whole of human history there has never been know a generation of people more wicked and perverse than these modern liberals of today. I think its a big hint that seeing how liberals are so eager to dismiss those things posted from the Qur'an. Sunnah, Tafsir and Jurisprudence, they do not care. So that is the position clearly observed on this forum and elsewhere. This is where the fate of America rest upon. The love of liberals has gone wax cold, fulfilling the prophecy spoken by Jesus about the signs of the last days to come. So this is where were at on the prophetic timetable.

I leave this debate now. There is nothing more that needs to be said.
 
What do you mean by that?

Metaphysical being beyond the physical, beyond the known or provable. Expression being a natural right. The suppression of expressions of the unknown is low class because anyone with an extra nickle in their pocket has pondered the unknown and it's authoritarian because it's trying to stop it.

My metaphysical beliefs don't line up exactly with any organized view but without those mine would be less.
 
I have seen a great many self absorbed liberals on and offline. You might think one would get used of it but its so dark and wicked that its a constant reminder of why we Christians place our faith in Christ. I have studied ancient history for years now. This study covered everything from ancient Sumer up to the present now. In the whole of human history there has never been know a generation of people more wicked and perverse than these modern liberals of today. I think its a big hint that seeing how liberals are so eager to dismiss those things posted from the Qur'an. Sunnah, Tafsir and Jurisprudence, they do not care. So that is the position clearly observed on this forum and elsewhere. This is where the fate of America rest upon. The love of liberals has gone wax cold, fulfilling the prophecy spoken by Jesus about the signs of the last days to come. So this is where were at on the prophetic timetable.

I leave this debate now. There is nothing more that needs to be said.

Oh dear! Gonna take your ball and go home to mommy? This is a forum for DEBATE, here you will find people who agree, ones who disagree and others who think you're a raving islamophobe. If you want a simple sounding board go elsewhere otherwise accept folk are going to disagree with you.
 
Metaphysical being beyond the physical, beyond the known or provable. Expression being a natural right. The suppression of expressions of the unknown is low class because anyone with an extra nickle in their pocket has pondered the unknown and it's authoritarian because it's trying to stop it.

My metaphysical beliefs don't line up exactly with any organized view but without those mine would be less.

Oh I see that you meant. Well I'll just sum it up this way. We who oppose Islam know a great deal about its teachings and culture. We know enough to warn others not to support Islamic emigration. It is not that we have a fear of the unknown, for Islam is known. Although back in 2001 it is safe to say that very few Americans knew much of anything about Islam.

Liberals on the other hand have neither knowledge of Islam or Christianity. They embrace Islam without knowing it and reject Christianity without knowing anything about it. Liberals are guilty of hating what they do not understand. They do not try to understand Christianity. They do not try to understand Islam. They do understand muslims kill Christians and Jews and just figure that muslims are the natural predator of Christians and Jews and are fine with that--fine to the point where they want millions of muslims to come into America and wipe us out. What they don't know will hurt them. Muslims will turn on those who helped them and force them to submit to Islam or be killed. But these liberals today have figured that they will be dead when all this happens so they are good with it. Shameful.
 
Oh I see that you meant. Well I'll just sum it up this way. We who oppose Islam know a great deal about its teachings and culture. We know enough to warn others not to support Islamic emigration. It is not that we have a fear of the unknown, for Islam is known. Although back in 2001 it is safe to say that very few Americans knew much of anything about Islam.

Liberals on the other hand have neither knowledge of Islam or Christianity. They embrace Islam without knowing it and reject Christianity without knowing anything about it. Liberals are guilty of hating what they do not understand. They do not try to understand Christianity. They do not try to understand Islam. They do understand muslims kill Christians and Jews and just figure that muslims are the natural predator of Christians and Jews and are fine with that--fine to the point where they want millions of muslims to come into America and wipe us out. What they don't know will hurt them. Muslims will turn on those who helped them and force them to submit to Islam or be killed. But these liberals today have figured that they will be dead when all this happens so they are good with it. Shameful.

What are you going to do with those of us who have studied Islam for decades and who call your comments BS? Moreover there are around 3 million Muslims already in the US, why haven't they tried to overthrow the government? Oh yes, that's right, it's BS and they are not interested.
 
Oh I see that you meant. Well I'll just sum it up this way. We who oppose Islam know a great deal about its teachings and culture. We know enough to warn others not to support Islamic emigration. It is not that we have a fear of the unknown, for Islam is known. Although back in 2001 it is safe to say that very few Americans knew much of anything about Islam.

Liberals on the other hand have neither knowledge of Islam or Christianity. They embrace Islam without knowing it and reject Christianity without knowing anything about it. Liberals are guilty of hating what they do not understand. They do not try to understand Christianity. They do not try to understand Islam. They do understand muslims kill Christians and Jews and just figure that muslims are the natural predator of Christians and Jews and are fine with that--fine to the point where they want millions of muslims to come into America and wipe us out. What they don't know will hurt them. Muslims will turn on those who helped them and force them to submit to Islam or be killed. But these liberals today have figured that they will be dead when all this happens so they are good with it. Shameful.

Every word you posted here is complete horsefeathers.
 
Islam runs on practice, not on theology



I think its a big hint that seeing how liberals are so eager to dismiss those things posted from the Qur'an. Sunnah, Tafsir and Jurisprudence, they do not care. So that is the position clearly observed on this forum and elsewhere. This is where the fate of America rest upon. The love of liberals has gone wax cold, fulfilling the prophecy spoken by Jesus about the signs of the last days to come. So this is where were at on the prophetic timetable.

I leave this debate now. There is nothing more that needs to be said.

Yah. One of the problems with studying Islam is that it's a religion of practice, not of internalized belief nor belief structures. In other words, the thing to watch for is customary religious practice, not the theology nor underlying causes behind the theology. Thus the problem with your analysis of the documents of Islam - apparently the vast majority of religious Islamics - out of billions of adherents - scarcely read the Koran. (Which is only allowed in Arabic - translations are hardly allowed in the Middle East, as Arabic is a live language there. In non-Arabic countries, translations may be allowed as study aids. But the ruling version is the original, in Arabic.)

The US is not like Japan or Russia or Western Europe - we're not falling below replacement birthrate - although if we close our borders to immigration, we might fall below replacement rate. The fate of the US is in our own hands - radical Islam nor the most powerful Islamic countries do not pose an existential threat to the US.
 
Re: Islam runs on practice, not on theology

Yah. One of the problems with studying Islam is that it's a religion of practice, not of internalized belief nor belief structures. In other words, the thing to watch for is customary religious practice, not the theology nor underlying causes behind the theology. Thus the problem with your analysis of the documents of Islam - apparently the vast majority of religious Islamics - out of billions of adherents - scarcely read the Koran. (Which is only allowed in Arabic - translations are hardly allowed in the Middle East, as Arabic is a live language there. In non-Arabic countries, translations may be allowed as study aids. But the ruling version is the original, in Arabic.)

Islam is the most authoritarian belief system on earth. Muslims who live in Islamic countries must obey Islam or die. These documents I have posted are not just any documents of Islam. They all embody the entire belief system all muslims must follow. Now those muslims you mentioned that don't read the Qur'an go to their Imams on and offline to inquire about their beliefs. You are right in saying that most muslims don't read the Qur'an. But their Imams do and thus they provide the brainwashing necessary to keep them deceived. I know this because I debate muslims in the Christian-muslim debate group I'm in. It is true that they do not know the Qur'an well. They merely parrot what their Imams tell them to say. But, as I said before, their Imams know the Qur'an in the same manner that I know the Qur'an. The books I have in my library are the same books the Imams have in their libraries. Once you understand Islam its not hard to follow after that.
Now muslims living in countries like Britain read both English and Arabic. The books of Islam that I have you can copy-paste all my references and locate them in all Islamic bookstores in western nations. Though overall its the Islamic clerics that preach the hate and their hearers are those that blindly follow after the words they hear.

The US is not like Japan or Russia or Western Europe - we're not falling below replacement birthrate - although if we close our borders to immigration, we might fall below replacement rate. The fate of the US is in our own hands - radical Islam nor the most powerful Islamic countries do not pose an existential threat to the US.

It makes no different if we close the borders or not. These illegal Mexicans don't join the service so the high birth rate among them only caters to Mexico.
Islam poses perhaps the greatest threat to the future of western nations. Granted, Islam is not the only threat. Liberals who follow after socialism and Islam are probably worse than the 9-11 hijackers because they are allowing for more 9-11s. Islam is also the largest military in the world as Islam is a militant death cult. I do not agree with how you say most all muslims are peaceful. I have not seen that. But even if we go by liberal statistics we still have an army larger than the entire population of the United States. What would happen if Europe fell to Islam? I think that is the question Americans need to answer to themselves now before we become too weak to defend ourselves.
 
Re: Islam runs on practice, not on theology

Islam is the most authoritarian belief system on earth. Muslims who live in Islamic countries must obey Islam or die. These documents I have posted are not just any documents of Islam. They all embody the entire belief system all muslims must follow. Now those muslims you mentioned that don't read the Qur'an go to their Imams on and offline to inquire about their beliefs. You are right in saying that most muslims don't read the Qur'an. But their Imams do and thus they provide the brainwashing necessary to keep them deceived. I know this because I debate muslims in the Christian-muslim debate group I'm in. It is true that they do not know the Qur'an well. They merely parrot what their Imams tell them to say. But, as I said before, their Imams know the Qur'an in the same manner that I know the Qur'an. The books I have in my library are the same books the Imams have in their libraries. Once you understand Islam its not hard to follow after that.
Now muslims living in countries like Britain read both English and Arabic. The books of Islam that I have you can copy-paste all my references and locate them in all Islamic bookstores in western nations. Though overall its the Islamic clerics that preach the hate and their hearers are those that blindly follow after the words they hear.



It makes no different if we close the borders or not. These illegal Mexicans don't join the service so the high birth rate among them only caters to Mexico.
Islam poses perhaps the greatest threat to the future of western nations. Granted, Islam is not the only threat. Liberals who follow after socialism and Islam are probably worse than the 9-11 hijackers because they are allowing for more 9-11s. Islam is also the largest military in the world as Islam is a militant death cult. I do not agree with how you say most all muslims are peaceful. I have not seen that. But even if we go by liberal statistics we still have an army larger than the entire population of the United States. What would happen if Europe fell to Islam? I think that is the question Americans need to answer to themselves now before we become too weak to defend ourselves.
Horse hockey

Sent from my F8331 using Tapatalk
 
What are you going to do with those of us who have studied Islam for decades and who call your comments BS? Moreover there are around 3 million Muslims already in the US, why haven't they tried to overthrow the government? Oh yes, that's right, it's BS and they are not interested.

There roughly 9 million muslims. The Qur'an is not a Divine holy book as there is nothing holy about the Qur'an. I've read it twice, cover to cover, and its a military field manual that gives muslims a step by step plan on how to conquer the world. Patience is their virtue of cultural warfare. They will not charge at the government when their numbers are too low for victory. They wait, as the Qur'an instructs them, until they've emigrated enough where their numbers are high enough to wage war. You will not see only about one instance in Islamic history where the muslims ran into the Byzantine army and charged them. The Byzantine army cut them to ribbons. When Muhammad heard the news he cried. He ego was broken and he knew his people could not charge at a superior army without first emigrating for jihad. So ever since the early days of Muhammad emigration has been the most important tactic of Islamic warfare. After Muhammad conquered Arabia, and after his death, muslims have emigrated to other nations for jihad just as Muhammad instructed.

The muslims have conquered almost every nation they have fought and because leaders of these conquered nations ignored the Sunnah of Muhammad. For in Islam, muslims are expected to emulate the Sunnah of Muhammad in all things, at all times and in all places. Muhammad to Islam is like Jesus Christ to Christianity, but the characters are drastically different.
 
No liberal was able to show me in the Constitution where it was authorized that an invading foreign army can freely come into the U.S. for the purpose of spreading their poison and sedition against the Constitution so they can murder all disbelievers as the Qur'an commands. All I got was how little liberals care about their grandchildren and how they are care about themselves and how they feel today. So this topic is pretty much solved. Liberals don't care.
 
Noble Qur'an 2:193, Madinah Period

"And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allah (Alone).* But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"

*footnote: "(V.2:193)
(A) Narrated Ibn 'Umar: Allah's Messenger said, "I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people till they testify that La illallah wa Anna Muhammmad-ur-Rasul Allah (none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah), and perform As-Salat (Iqamat-as-Salat) and give Zakat, so if they perform all that, then they save their lives, and properties from me except for Islamic laws, and their reckoning (accounts) will be with (done by) Allah." (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol 1, Hadith No.24).
================================================== ===================
Tafsir Al-Qurtubi,

"Fight them until there is no more fitna and the deen belongs to Allah alone.
This is a command to fight every idolater in every place according to those who say that it abrogates the previous ayats. According to those who say that it does not abrogate other ayats, it means: fight those about whom Allah says, "if they fight you". The former is the more likely meaning. It is an unqualified command to fight without any precondition of hostilities being initiated by the unbelievers. The evidence for that is in the words of Allah, "and the din belongs to Allah alone." The Prophet said, " I was commanded to fight people until they say, 'There is no god but Allah.' The ayat and hadith both indicate that the reason for fighting is disbelief because Allah says, "until there is no more fitna," meaning disbelief in this case. So the goal is to abolish disbelief and that is clear.
Ibn 'Abbas, Qatada, ar-Rabi', as-Suddi and others said that fitna here means shirk and the subsequent injury to the believers caused by it. The root of fitna is testing and trial, derived from the term for testing silver when it is put in the fire to separate the impurities from the pure metal.

If they cease, there should be no enmity towards any but wrongdoers.
If they stop and become Muslim or submit by paying jizya in the case of the people of the Book. Otherwise they should be fought and they are wrongdoers and only transgress against themselves. What is done to the wrongdoers is called enmity since it is the repayment of enmity. Wrongdoing and injustice involve enmity and repayment of enmity is also called enmity. The wrongdoers are either those who initiate fighting or those who remain entrenched in disbelief and fitna."

Tafsir Ibn Kathir,

"{Fitnah} meaning, disbelief and worshipping of others with Allah. {and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allah (Alone).} It refers to the fact that the Religion of Allah (Islam) must be prevalent over other religions. {But if they cease,} meaning, you are stop fighting them the moment they stop fighting the believers, and thereto Islam they turned; for whoever fights them after that, he is then a transgressor; and that there should be no transgression except against the polytheists and wrongdoers. Narrated Nafi' that Ibn 'Umar said that two men there came to him during the dispute of Ibn Az-Zubayr and said: "People are fighting each others. What keeps you from taking part in the fighting despite your being Ibn 'Umar and the Companion of the Prophet (PBUH)?" He said: "What keeps me as such is that Allah prohibited the killing of a Muslim." They said: "Has not Allah said: {And fight them until there is no more Fitnah}?" Ibn 'Umar said: "We fought until there were no more Fitnah and all the religion (worship) was for Allah and you want to fight till the Fitnah befalls and not to let the religion be for Allah."
 
Islam does not recognize the rights of women. This includes liberal women.

Would Hillary have a chance to become President in an Islamic country?

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol.9, Book 92, Hadith No.7099,

"Narrated Abu Bakra: During the battle of Al-Jamal, Allah benefited me with a Word (I heard from the Prophet). When the Prophet heard the news that the people of the Persia had made the daughter of Khosrau their queen (ruler), he said, "Never will succeed such a nation as makes a woman their ruler."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noble Qur'an 4:15 (Muhsin Khan):

"And those of your women who commit illegal sexual intercourse, take the evidence of four witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them (i.e. women) to houses until death comes to them or Allah ordains for them some (other) way*."

*footnote: "(V.4:15) The provision of this Verse has been abrogated by the Verse of the Surat An-Nur (V.24:2), ordaining lashing for the unmarried and stoning to death for the married, when four witneses testify to the crime."


If a muslim women is raped, four men must testify she was not raped.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Women are considered mentally deficit,

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol.1, Chapter 12, hadith No. 2658,

"(12) CHAPTER. The witness of women.

And the Statement of Allah: "...And if there are not two men (available), then a man and two women..." (V.2:282)."

2658. Narrated Abu Sa'id Al-Khudri: The Prophet said, "Isn't the witness of a woman equal to half that of a man?" The women said, "Yes." He said, "This is because of the deficiency of a woman's mind."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Child molesting legalized,

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol.7, Book 67, Chapter 60, Hadith 5158,

"(60) CHAPTER. Whoever consummated his marriage with a lady of nine years of age.

5158. Narrated 'Urwa: The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with 'Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)."

From Ibn Ishaq "The life of Muhammad" (The Sira)

1461 "When Mohammed saw Ummul Fadl she was a crawling baby and he said, "If she grows up and I am still alive, I will marry her." At this time he was about 55."

Muhammad lusted after a crawling baby! This is why in some Islamic countries men are allowed to marry babies! Its the Sunnah of Muhammad to do so!
Muslims don't name their kids "Muhammad" for nothing!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Raping of non-muslim women is legal in Islam...as long as a muslim (or gang of muslims) can catch them.

Sunan Abu Dawud, Vol.2, Chapter 43/44, Hadith 2155,

"Chapter 43/44. Regarding Intercourse With Captives

2155. Abu Sa'eed Al-Khudri narrated that the Messenger of Allah sent an expedition to Awtas on the Day of Hunain, and they met the enemy, fought them, and won the battle. They captured some slaves, but some of the Companions of the Messenger of Allah felt uncomfortable in having relations with them because of their pagan husbands. At this, Allah revealed: "And chaste, free women, except for those whom your right hand possesses..." meaning that they are allowed for you after their waiting periods have finished." (Sahih)

This is why Europe has such an alarming high rape epidemic! It doesn't matter if the husbands are still alive either. Sex slavery and rape was the occupation of Muhammad and his companions.

How is this authorized by the Constitution? Its not! Islam is an invasion of all things good and nobody, either conservative or liberal, should be defending this kind of evil! This is one issue liberals and conservatives need to agree upon.
 
There roughly 9 million muslims. The Qur'an is not a Divine holy book as there is nothing holy about the Qur'an. I've read it twice, cover to cover, and its a military field manual that gives muslims a step by step plan on how to conquer the world. Patience is their virtue of cultural warfare. They will not charge at the government when their numbers are too low for victory. They wait, as the Qur'an instructs them, until they've emigrated enough where their numbers are high enough to wage war. You will not see only about one instance in Islamic history where the muslims ran into the Byzantine army and charged them. The Byzantine army cut them to ribbons. When Muhammad heard the news he cried. He ego was broken and he knew his people could not charge at a superior army without first emigrating for jihad. So ever since the early days of Muhammad emigration has been the most important tactic of Islamic warfare. After Muhammad conquered Arabia, and after his death, muslims have emigrated to other nations for jihad just as Muhammad instructed.

The muslims have conquered almost every nation they have fought and because leaders of these conquered nations ignored the Sunnah of Muhammad. For in Islam, muslims are expected to emulate the Sunnah of Muhammad in all things, at all times and in all places. Muhammad to Islam is like Jesus Christ to Christianity, but the characters are drastically different.

Muslims are people, not the borg. Trying to claim they all have the same thoughts is an obvious attempt to dehumanise them.

Replace the words Muslims with Jews in your post and you'd sound like a Nazi.
 
Back
Top Bottom