This is what transphobic ignorance looks like.
Consensual sex isn't sexual assault. A trans female having sex with a cisgender guy is far more likely to be the submissive partner, so it isn't assault, especially if she is post-op.
I'm sorry reality is transphobic.
If you don't know who you're having sex with you can't consent. A man pretending to be a submissive and pretending to be a woman to trick another man into having sex with him should be considered sexual assault. Even if he mutilated his penis and testicles.
Utter nonsense because no adult is tricked into have consensual sex. . The act of prostitution is proof of this.
Reality is still transphobic.
Write their tricked into non-considual sex. If they wouldn't have sex with a person if they knew they were transgender then lying about it is tricking them.
Having sex with someone you think is a woman because you don't know that they're really a man is not consentual.
I'm not talking about the act but about the arousal one gets from devices like vibrators or cartoon porn.
You apparently don't know what that word means or about the intersex.
Not talking about me personally.Is she pre por post-op?
What kind of sex did you have? Many trans females are celibate during their transition because of body dysphoria.
What crime is that?
a man pretending to be a woman and sleeps with a man under such false pretenses is not consensual. The man didn’t consent to sleep with another man.
You did when I asked you about it. Here was the exchange.
I don't think it upsets anyone that you think attraction is a reflection of someone's DNA and chromosomes and if you know those. That's an amusing theory.
Now you've changed your story to anatomical. So what happens when a male has sex with a transwoman who is anatomically a woman and who they see as a woman? How do you keep what you're saying now consistent with what you said previously?
I never mentioned DNA in any of those posts.
When did that change occur?
No such thing exists.
If they lie to themselves and pretend to guy is a woman that's their business
There's no such thing as a man whose anatomically a woman.
Yeah if you're in love and you but know what's going on go for it labels aren't that important.
Excellent point and I think that's a good approach for many things.
Indeed
I did and you confirmed your argument that attraction is based on your sex when were born, not how you present now, which now that I'm thinking about it more is a ****ing weird argument to make. Who the **** is attracted to new born babies?
Its a hypothetical, why don't you use your imagination? If you're a transwoman who presents as a woman today and you attract a man is that man gay because you were born a male? What is your actual argument? Don't be frail about it. Is it about anatomy and anatomical attraction or about your DNA?
They do. If your argument is that a dildo is anatomical to a penis so it's okay for women to get off on them and that doesnt make them plasticsexuals, then why does your argument change for fake breasts and constructed vaginas?
What does this mean for your arguments about dildos? Why does your argument appear to keep changing? Are women who use didlos pretending but are really plasticsexuals?
But there is such thing as a piece of plastic that is? Make your arguments coherent.
It is a crime to deceive a person so you can have sex with them. It's called rape by deception. There would not have been consent had there not been deception. Your questions are answered in the links. Being obtuse is not going to win any debates. Please learn shit before offering stupid arguments.
What crime? Is it a crime now to lie to yourself sexual partners? What about women with breast implants or men who pretend to be wealthy and successful? Criminals as well?
www.oklahomalegalgroup.com
www.psychologytoday.com
consentawareness.net
The first case involves a person pretending to be the victim's boyfriend in a dark room. That's not the same as lying about your occupation or wealth or having fake tits or wearing hair plugs.It is a crime to deceive a person so you can have sex with them. It's called rape by deception. There would not have been consent had there not been deception. Your questions are answered in the links. Being obtuse is not going to win any debates. Please learn shit before offering stupid arguments.
Consent and Rape by Deception
The crimes of rape, sexual assault, and other sex offenses are defined and prosecuted under the individual and specific laws of each state. As a general rule, consent - or more appropriately, the lack of consent - is an essential element to achieve a conviction.
Rape by Deception
Deceiving another person in order to have sex with them is morally wrong when it prevents the other person from giving fully informed consent to the act.
Rape by Fraud in Penal Code
In the US, where rape happens determines whether a crime has taken place. Legislators of each state create the laws in that individual jurisdiction, therefore, what is legal in one place can be ill…
)
You have no clue in how to compile information. Which is why you seem confused.The first case involves a person pretending to be the victim's boyfriend in a dark room. That's not the same as lying about your occupation or wealth or having fake tits or wearing hair plugs.
The second link mentions the first case and some international cases, which I don't give a shit about because I'm talking about laws in this county.
The third was about when deceit is actually a crime and that's when it harms someone, like not revealing that your HIV +. Again, not the same as not revealing that you have fake tits. (Which isn't just a trans issue. Plenty of men have been lured in by fake tits.
I never really understood why men get so upset about fake boobs. Like what's the difference? Do they feel or act differently?The first case involves a person pretending to be the victim's boyfriend in a dark room. That's not the same as lying about your occupation or wealth or having fake tits or wearing hair plugs.
The second link mentions the first case and some international cases, which I don't give a shit about because I'm talking about laws in this county.
The third was about when deceit is actually a crime and that's when it harms someone, like not revealing that your HIV +. Again, not the same as not revealing that you have fake tits. (Which isn't just a trans issue. Plenty of men have been lured in by fake tits.
Define lying. Are you saying the mere act of being trans is lying or are you saying not telling a potential partner that you're trans is lying?
They (both silicone and saline) are much firmer than natural breasts that are mostly fat tissue.
I'm gay, so I'm still lost as to why the outrage. Your breasts are firmer than usual, so what? How does that affect men and their ability to enjoy them?
Its not not a thing just because you pretend about it. Lying about your occupation or the amount of money in your bank account or having fake tits isn't something that's going to get you charged for non consensual sex. Not in this country.
Morals are entirely made up. They are make believe.
Again, this is just your opinion. And?
