How does that help your argument? Then it's not just representative of Western society, but of current human civilization in general.I already dismantled this example and have shown how western socities recognize gender as a social construct. The Olympics isnt just representative of Western society. Its an international organization made up of more than just western socities so using it as your example of western society is just false.
Is being gay offensive or a sign of weakness to you?How does that help your argument? Then it's not just representative of Western society, but of current human civilization in general.
Sometimes it's a felony.Actually, you might be a great test subject.
Why do you care who sticks their dick in whom?
Does that include straight males as well? Is that how you were born or how you were trained?
Because within our species there's only two sexes. When you point out that there's people with defective reproductive systems within the two taxes that doesn't argue against the two sexes sorry. If a biologist includes those that sexes he doesn't know what he's talking about.Why? Explain that.
Just like the Earth isn't flat there are only two sexes.You can explain why the earth isn't flat or at least we all hope you could. Explain what biologists have wrong here.
But you have shown absolutely nothing at all to show that there is a third sex. That's the only way you prove that there's more than two sexes.I've provided work from a biologist explaining is bimodal.
It really is that simple. There's either two sexes or there's three or more that's it.Its not my fault you seem to think the only options are binary or a third sex. Don't blame me for your simple mentality.
Mean words sorry I hurt your feelings.And all you're doing is saying mean words as a retort because you can't use your intellect so laugh all you want.
Ooo, more mean words....
No. What does that have to do with the topic we were discussing?Is being gay offensive or a sign of weakness to you?
Can you clarify? Are we talking about two guys feeling each other up where only one of them wears a wig and fake tits and won't let the other guy grab his dick?You do know that many trans-women will not allow their partner to touch them below the waist because that would be very dysphoric? Is that still gay?
TQ+, not the LGB. There's a lot of demands that lesbians and gays and heterosexuals change their sexual orientation to affirm someone's identity. My objection to them is the same objection I had to conversion therapy"Trans women in sports" is just the most extreme example of an LGBT-etc ideological stance that many find harmful to society. It's not just what people do in private, it's about what ideologues try to change about society's rules.
No. What does that have to do with the topic we were discussing?
Obviously you dont understand gender identity if you claim that she is a guy in a wig and fake breasts. That would be a cross dresser/ transvestite. A transgender female is not a guy and she never was. That is the core idea of being transgender.Can you clarify? Are we talking about two guys feeling each other up where only one of them wears a wig and fake tits and won't let the other guy grab his dick?
No it's when two males have sex with each other and it doesn't matter how they identify. If one of them identifies as a woman it's not straight if one of them identifies as a gorilla it's not bestiality.Is being gay offensive or a sign of weakness to you?
Yes. Two men kissing and hugging it's gay if it's done in the romantic way.You do know that many trans-women will not allow their partner to touch them below the waist because that would be very dysphoric? Is that still gay?
This is a ploy to try and get people to abandon a discussion. Essentially it's an ad hominem and you're only doing this because you're argumentative position is disadvantaged.You seem to have a problem with this issue and you have an obvious problem with both homosexuality and transgender people.
In that I don't imagine that it changes your sex fair enough it doesn't that's fake. Nobody throughout the history of humanity was ever attracted to gender identity. That's why we call it sexual orientation and not gender identity orientation.Obviously you dont understand gender identity
Transgenders are transvestites.if you claim that she us a guy in a wig and fake breasts. That would be a cross dresser/ transvestite.
A transgender female is a trans man because that's the only way you can be female in that situation.A transgender female is not a guy and she never was.
In their own heads fair enough. The rest of the world will absolutely never conform to this.That is the core idea of being transgender.
How did you conclude that?You seem to have a problem with this issue and you have an obvious problem with both homosexuality and transgender people.
Obviously you dont understand gender identity if you claim that she is a guy in a wig and fake breasts. That would be a cross dresser/ transvestite. A transgender female is not a guy and she never was. That is the core idea of being transgender.
I don't know how she got to that point I find a lot of this trans stuff to be homophobic that's my primary objection to it.How did you conclude that?
Lol
I don't know how she got to that point I find a lot of this trans stuff to be homophobic that's my primary objection to it.
Gender identity and sexual orientation are seperate topics and have nothing to do with each other, so take your trollish nonsense somewhere else.
And is it bigotry/whateverphobic to not want a 50-year-old man who identifies as an 8-year-old girl into the girls' elementary school shower/dressing room? I mean, it should be cool if that's how "she" identifies, right?Would you consider it transphobic for lesbians not to want to date or allow trans women into their space?
For whatever reason chronological identity isn't legitimate but gender identity is.And is it bigotry/whateverphobic to not want a 50-year-old man who identifies as an 8-year-old girl into the girls' elementary school shower/dressing room? I mean, it should be cool if that's how "she" identifies, right?
I'm hetero so I don't date lesbians. Lesbians don't get to tell others who can use the bathroom. Get over yourself and mind your own business. Are you still being harassed by transgender guys in your dreams?Would you consider it transphobic for lesbians not to want to date or allow trans women into their space?
Just so we're clear, does this apply in general? Meaning, a 50-year-old guy can go into the women's public shower, elementary school girl's locker room/shower, etc...?I'm hetero so I don't date lesbians. Lesbians don't get to tell others who can use the bathroom. Get over yourself and mind your own business. Are you still being harassed by transgender guys in your dreams?
If it's not Gay, it's perversion.A dude in a wig is a dude. So yeah, thats gay.
I didn't ask you that.I'm hetero so I don't date lesbians.
I was talking about lesbian spaces.Lesbians don't get to tell others who can use the bathroom.
Just answer the question why is that so hardGet over yourself and mind your own business.
Keep your fetishes to yourself.Are you still being harassed by transgender guys in your dreams?
You are adding to the pages. Also discussing a topic is not obsession with it.Nineteen preegin pages about this, unbelievable.
It's not even worth nine pages because most of the male population wants to have sex with a regular female, so if that truly is the case, which it is, then the real reason
so many men are this obsessed with the issue says a lot more about them than it does about trans women.
People posting on the topic.Really, honestly, who TF cares?
So then they're left alone and this shouldn't matter to them.Leave trans folks alone, they aren't interested in our opinion, nor should they be.
If someone's opinion interferes with their happiness that's their problem.Leave them be, let them enjoy their lives, let them pick and choose who and what they want to be, because clearly NOT being allowed to flies in the face of "the pursuit of happiness".
Discussing a subject is not meddling in anybody's lives.There is no legitimate or rational reason to meddle in their lives unless one of them is meddling in YOURS.
It got 19 pages because people like you post on it.And that's about the individual and not about trans people.
It's just as likely you may encounter a trans person who is an asshole as much as you might encounter a regular person who is an asshole.
Trans people are not superhumans, or perfect, or saints.
They have good and bad persons in the same proportion as the rest of the world.
Nineteen goddamn pages, incredible.
I dont expect sense from libs like you who dont know what a woman is anyway.
It's representative of that organization which isn't even an exclusively western one and that organization does indeed recognize gender as a social construct and allows trans people to compete as the gender they identify with provided they were on hormone blockers and didn't go through male puberty. Your argument is just bad. The Olympics position isn't that trans isn't a real thing, it's that some trans athletes might have an unfair advantage in some instances.How does that help your argument? Then it's not just representative of Western society, but of current human civilization in general.
And calling sex binary would make sense if we all neatly fit into one or the other category but we dont, hence the term bimodal rather than binary.Because within our species there's only two sexes.
Defective is your word. Disorder is the term that biologists and health professionals use because defective implies that their bodies were made wrong rather than just different than how we normally see them ordered. These are people with biological differences than you. They exist. Try not to let that scare you.When you point out that there's people with defective reproductive systems within the two taxes that doesn't argue against the two sexes sorry. If a biologist includes those that sexes he doesn't know what he's talking about.
You didn't show everyone fits neatly into either category, you're just name calling the people who don't to avoid addressing the fault in your logic.Just like the Earth isn't flat there are only two sexes.
This third sex thing remains your silly and weak strawman. I linked to you the paper from the biologist trying to explain to you what bimodal means.But you have shown absolutely nothing at all to show that there is a third sex. That's the only way you prove that there's more than two sexes.
I have no doubt at all it's that simple in your simple mind. Maybe it's your thought process that's binary....It really is that simple. There's either two sexes or there's three or more that's it.
You didn't. You amused me with your argument based in your feelings.Mean words sorry I hurt your feelings.
I get all my crazy ideologues here; no need to visit either of those places.There are no gender ideologues. Stay off of TikTok and Twittler.
This isn't medically possible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?