Thanks for highlighting your sad misconception. "Getting transferred to women's prisons" intrinsically implied that the subjects were originally in men's prisons, and they would have got there because some court originally considered them males guilty of a crime. Not that they committed crimes so that they could get into women's prisons. I don't blame you for doing a fast fade after such a blunder.
I'm not so sure it's a choice to have issues with your sex. But it is a choice to identify as the opposite sex for some incoherent nonsense like non-binary.
There is no choice that is made to be transgender or nonbinary. You have no evidence otherwise, despite your opinions.
Well non-binary is based strictly on stereotypes so yes there is regarding that. And you can have gender dysphoria without being transgender so yes again
No. Just common sense
See above, You have an opinion but not objective evidence.
No.
That's bigotry.
Again your bigotry
Again no and it's your bigotry.
Absolute garbage on your part. I maintain that epigenetic factors are not as determinative as genetic ones and that Lisa's comparison remains fallacious, as does your defense of it.
Which is how I easily dismiss much of what you say. It's amazing you know this with regards to things I say but don't with regards to things you say.
Irrelevant. Are you claiming that epigenetic factors do not have an effect on people, or that their effects are somehow chosen by the person? I am not going to disagree that genetic effects are most likely stronger than epigenetic effects. But that doesn't make epigenetic effects any less non-choice. Nor does it mean that there is an actual genetic effect that would override a given epigenetic effect.
But Lisa did not simply state that both genetic and epigenetic factors were "non-choice," she compared the less prevalent epigenetic factors to the factors produced dominantly by genetic ones, eye and hair color. Transgender ideology wants to assert that the former set of factors trumps the latter, but that's an assertion based in ideology first and science second.
You are reading far too much into it. You can compare two things as long as they have a commonality with regards to what you are comparing them for. We hear the saying that one is comparing apples to oranges. That is legitimate in the framework of comparing fruits. We can compare apples to broccoli if we're doing so in the framework of grown foods. Nothing of what she said indicates the epigenetics trumps genetics. That's you inserting the idea in there, effectively making a strawman argument. Nor is there any indicator that there is a genetic factor that would override the claimed epigenetic factor. Any assertion of such is based on ideology first and science second. The true science of it, is it is not known what the actual cause is. Personally, I think part of the reason, at least, is that there is no one cause, just like there is no one virus or germ that causes the common cold. We can talk about some of the results such as intersex conditions, or variant brain structures, but that would not be the ultimate cause.
1.)There is no transgender ideology or trans agenda. They don't exist.
You are reading Lisa's statement as a simple comparison and choosing to ignore the ideological underpinnings that she has continually voiced. That's your strawman argument and you're free to remain married to it.
(1) If no trans ideology or agenda exists, what do trans advocates use to justify their positions? I hope you do not plan to say "science," because you still have not answered my original question as to whether you are regarding epigenetic factors as determinative of gender (as opposed to sexual) identity.
If this was supposed to be a link it didn't work.
There are no such thing as trans advocates except for those fighting for equal rights. There is no such thing as trans ideology unless you also believe there is a cancer, diabetes or depression ideology. This is purely a medical condition defined by psychological factors.
www.theravive.com
What rights do trans people not have?
Then how do people like lilly Tino get away with mocking trans people like he does?
Gender Dysphoria DSM-5 302.85 (F64.9) - Therapedia
That's not a right anyone has nobody has the right to business
This is also not a right anyone has.
When you crawl out from under your rock maybe you'll know.
