• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is due process a human right? (from a moral perspective)

Is due process a human right?


  • Total voters
    69
No, my alternative is private enforcement. It's not a radical idea, as there are already more people working for private security firms than there are cops, and private arbitration is a rapidly growing industry because of the failure of government-run courts.
So whoever can afford the biggest possie gets to tell you what to do. Yeah can't see anything wrong going there...
:ROFLMAO:(y)(y)
 
I guess the question then is why anyone would think the concept exists somewhere in nature outside of human societies and just being a social construct. It's like thinking the concept of civil law or fairness exists in nature waiting to be found. It seems to me this is all just stuff we humans make up, rather than find- like our systems of language, laws of grammar, currency systems, etc...
Outside of human society, there is no concept of "good vs evil." The lions are not evil when they seek out a gazelle to be their prey. They are simply seeking food to survive, as all 'predators' do.
 
No, my alternative is private enforcement.
Clan warfare. If you have the resources to hire mercenaries, they will enforce your 'claims.'
It's not a radical idea, as there are already more people working for private security firms than there are cops, and private arbitration is a rapidly growing industry because of the failure of government-run courts.
Private arbitration is a tool of the powerful to deny access to the courts by the small and weak.
 
Outside of human society, there is no concept of "good vs evil." The lions are not evil when they seek out a gazelle to be their prey. They are simply seeking food to survive, as all 'predators' do.

Elephants mourn their dead and help injured members of the herd. Rats also demonstrate empathy:

 
Why not? If I can afford a bigger possie than you, what's to keep me from imposing my will on you?
that's what we have now.
No- the current system still has some accountability and checks and balances- even to you, since we're still sort of a democracy. You get a say. That's how you close the loop.
 
Elephants mourn their dead and help injured members of the herd. Rats also demonstrate empathy:

Yes. We all know that humans treat each other perfectly when left free... :ROFLMAO: (y)
 
Not a big fan of civil juries, eh?
See I told you it was going to revert to this argument that everyone will behave perfect if just left alone. So funny. It's like these folks have never been out in the real world.
 
Why not? If I can afford a bigger possie than you, what's to keep me from imposing my will on you?

Violence is costly - economically, socially, even personally - which is why only a small fraction of people are actually violent. Governments however promote violence. Politicians can start a wars without bearing the consequences, because someone else pays the price, usually in blood or taxes.
 
Violence is costly - economically, socially, even personally - which is why only a small fraction of people are actually violent. Governments however promote violence. Politicians can start a wars without bearing the consequences, because someone else pays the price, usually in blood or taxes.

Mob bosses order their possies to do their dirty work.
 
Elephants mourn their dead and help injured members of the herd. Rats also demonstrate empathy:

Many higher mammals are known to grieve. Elephants are also known to collectively destroy entire villages if they believe the villages prevent their access to food or are a threat to the herd. Nothing evil about it.
 
Fellow citizens are just too unreliable.

No, they are simply too incompetent. You've got to be able to focus, evaluate arguments, weigh evidence, etc. Just look at some of the "debates" in this forum, and imagine someone's life depending on the same kind of people.
 
And you would prefer that the Bill of Rights not even be a factor in neighborly disputes. Might makes right is always much preferable, according to aociswundumho.

That's actually how cops operate, in case you haven't noticed.
 
Back
Top Bottom