• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Is anti-gay unconstitutional

shuamort said:
What? You mean someone changed the definition of a word?
Click to expand...
Actually, I just looked it up. Semantics my dear watson.


"A person of profound mental retardation having a mental age below three years and generally being unable to learn connected speech or guard against common dangers. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now considered offensive."
 
ShamMol said:
Actually, I just looked it up. Semantics my dear watson.


"A person of profound mental retardation having a mental age below three years and generally being unable to learn connected speech or guard against common dangers. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now considered offensive."
Click to expand...
My point was a bit of a joke and a point being made that the definitions of words tend to change over time. Like idiocy, or for this thread, "marriage".
 
It is a valid point, but that word changed not for convinience, but for vulgarity purposes.

I actually agree with you, but I was asked to find the old law...so...that is what the old law says and most likely means.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom