• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

IRS faces lawsuit for failing to enforce church electioneering ban

Somerville

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
17,873
Reaction score
8,363
Location
On an island. Not that one!
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Socialist
The Freedom from Religion Foundation is a 501(c)(3) group that is arguing the IRS is unlawfully favouring church groups. A federal judge has agreed


more on the suit from the FFRF site

Response to the ruling from The Christian Post
 
The Freedom from Religion Foundation is a 501(c)(3) group that is arguing the IRS is unlawfully favouring church groups. A federal judge has agreed



more on the suit from the FFRF site

Response to the ruling from The Christian Post

If the government is going to enforce separation of church and state, it should do so. The IRS code for 501 (c)3 prohibits this activity and it should be enforced.

Given the most recent targeting of 501 (c)4 applicants, which ironically CAN participate in advocating a political activity, it is only reasonable for the court to require them to enforce ALL their regulations.

Either the regulations mean something, or they don't. Are enforceable, or not. And if they don't and are not, why have them at all; the IRS or the regulations?
 
It's about time abuses of religious electioneering ban are addressed. I'm cynical enough to expect the religious lobby is powerful enough to squash this feeble attempt, but it's better than continuing to ignore the blatant law breaking that has gone on for decades.
 

And I am cynical enough not to take something like this at fa e value.
 
And I am cynical enough not to take something like this at fa e value.

What is religious electioneering? Don't tell me I have to learn another new buzzword! :mrgreen:

Good evening, SMTA. :2wave:
 
What is religious electioneering? Don't tell me I have to learn another new buzzword! :mrgreen:

Good evening, SMTA. :2wave:

Good evening P

I think it refers to "churches that allegedly violated federal tax law by engaging in partisan advocacy."
 
What is religious electioneering? Don't tell me I have to learn another new buzzword! :mrgreen:

Good evening, SMTA. :2wave:


Don't know why you haven't heard about this problem. It has been around for a while


Basically there is a subset of Christians which demands exemption from taxes that other groups must pay while objecting to an IRS regulation that calls for political neutrality from groups receiving religion-based exemptions.

Easy solution -- pay your taxes and speak your mind.
 
What is religious electioneering? Don't tell me I have to learn another new buzzword! :mrgreen:

Good evening, SMTA. :2wave:

Hey!

Ack - see post #8!
 

:thanks: for the explanation! :I really hadn't heard it before. :thumbs:
 
Good evening P

I think it refers to "churches that allegedly violated federal tax law by engaging in partisan advocacy."

Good evening, Sangha! :2wave:

:thanks:
 
The Freedom from Religion Foundation is a 501(c)(3) group that is arguing the IRS is unlawfully favouring church groups. A federal judge has agreed



more on the suit from the FFRF site

Response to the ruling from The Christian Post

Oh my, that would appear to be a problem for the church. if we could get them out of politics and campaigning that would be awesome. I am cool with them existing, but it would be nice if they just existed and did not try to make laws using their tax free benefits. I also hope they start getting taxed. It is a business, not a charity. I do not want them destroyed, but it would be cool to get some money to help out with general operations of the country they enjoy existing in.
 

I totally agree. if the restrictions of the statute bother you, or they impede the direction you wish to go then you are supposed to simply chose to leave the special status. No one is forcing them not to campaign, they are just saying if you are going to act as a taxable entity like a corporation or business then you should pay taxes as one.
 
I pay taxes, I didn't realize this means my free speech has been destroyed!
 
I hope the lawsuit is successful. It is ridiculous that I as a taxpayer have to subsidize the odious activities of rightwing churches and their Obamaphobia fetish.
 
I hope the lawsuit is successful. It is ridiculous that I as a taxpayer have to subsidize the odious activities of rightwing churches and their Obamaphobia fetish.

Do you have any factual numbers from the federal budget on how much money you or other taxpayers "subsidize" these churches?

I didn't think so. Church members pay their bills, not you or other taxpayers.
 
Religious institutions in America appear to be receiving somewhere in the neighbourhood of $70,000,000,000.00 worth of tax exemptions annually.

 
This won't go far, after a lot of black churches get slammed.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…