Che said:Stinger my ignorant friend.................
See the rules page, my friend.Che said:Stinger my ignorant friend
Stinger said:Che, if take your invectives and...............
If you have something of substance to say, if you can rebut the issue, then try again else don't bother and have not time for childishness.
KCConservative said:See the rules page, my friend.
Trajan Octavian Titus said:I just saw him on Fox and he sounded very convincing he was a 2 star general and supervisor of the entire Iraqi Airforce so he would have been in a position to know if the WMD had been transferred to Syria, he says that three 727's (I think) were converted into transport carriers that flew 56 sorties to deliver the WMD stockpiles to Damascus, Syria.
Che said:Let's think about this logically. What intrest does Syria have in being sanctioned by the entire UN.
Che said:Let's think about this logically. What intrest does Syria have in being sanctioned by the entire UN.
Che said:Let's think about this logically. What intrest does Syria have in being sanctioned by the entire UN.
Missouri Mule said:Until and unless all of the WMD are accounted for, this will remain an open question.
Personally, I am unconvinced that Saddam did not play a part in 9/11 because the al-Ani/Atta connection has never been adequately rebutted.
Stinger said:Which is why when asking a person opposed to the war are asked "well what happen to the WMD he admitted he had and the UN confirmed he had" they cannot answer. AND we were suppose to know, Saddam was required to tell us and he didn't.
Which has nothing to do with WMD.
The rules apply to the conspiracy forum and all forums except the basement.Che said:Please, I've heard worse... besides this isn't the conspiracy theory forum
Missouri Mule said:Actually it does. Saddam was a master practitioner of deception. If he had connections to 9/11, the al-Ani matter would conceivably address the origin of the anthrax that happened after 9/11. Weaponized anthrax is considered by most rational people to be part of WMD.
I suggest that you reread the history of this matter. You can start here.
http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/2002question/prague.htm
VTA said:Well considering that sanctions were utterly useless
For one country, it didn't matter for over a decade...Che said:Yes of course. Not being able to trade with the richest country and most oil thirsty country doesn't really matter, does it?
ProudAmerican said:surprisingly, not many of the anti war folks are participating in this thread.
:doh
cherokee said:My question to him (ex Iraq general) would be why did he wait until the book deal to tell everyone?
We can only wait and see what the US investigators come up with
ProudAmerican said:surprisingly, not many of the anti war folks are participating in this thread.
:doh
Che said:Because we all know that it's just another Fox News conspiracy theory.
Don't sweat it, Mule. It's just one of those liberal catch-phrases they use when backed into a corner. "If it came from Fox it can't be true." :slapme:Missouri Mule said:And you know that for a fact, or are you just pulling our legs?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?