• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Iranian Missile Attack Hits Mossad Headquarters Close to Tel Aviv

I posted the video clip from CNN in post #3 above
It's a post of the CNN allegedly reporting on Iran saying it targeted it. It's fake nonsense the Iranians recycle from time to time, don't believe anything you hear from the Iranians. Mossad HQ is in a known location and you can't hide it being hit with a ballistic missile. The Iranian regime are a known joke.

 
So far in this thread, I don't see any mainstream new sources being cited, so whether this event actually happened is still unknown.
 
So far in this thread, I don't see any mainstream new sources being cited, so whether this event actually happened is still unknown.
Like the mainstream news that told us Sadamm had WMD and Joe Biden was fine cognitively and he just had a stutter?
 
Like the mainstream news that told us Sadamm had WMD and Joe Biden was fine cognitively and he just had a stutter?
The mainstream news that has high standards for reporting and isn't just a rumor mill like social media sites or a lot of minor news sites tend to be.
 
The mainstream news that has high standards for reporting and isn't just a rumor mill like social media sites or a lot of minor news sites tend to be.
How can they have high standards for reporting when they pushed the lies that Saddam had WMD and Joe Biden was fine cognitively? I bet you won't even comment on those two things.
 
How can they have high standards for reporting when they pushed the lies that Saddam had WMD and Joe Biden was fine cognitively? I bet you won't even comment on those two things.
People will go with the best information available at the time. Sometimes that information is wrong, but that's not on the news agencies themselves as long as their processes for vetting and other safeguards are in place. At the end of the day, if a new agency gets it right over 90% of the time, then that's far better than some twitter post that tends to either intentionally be misinformation or is just plain sloppy.

What you should be looking at is overall stats, like those provided by mediabiasfactcheck that show overall accuracy and not be fooled by single instances here and there. That's how actual analysis works and actual analysis, using actual data is far more preferable than random witch hunting.
 
People will go with the best information available at the time. Sometimes that information is wrong, but that's not on the news agencies themselves as long as their processes for vetting and other safeguards are in place.
How can they have high standards for reporting when they pushed the lies that Saddam had WMD and Joe Biden was fine cognitively? I bet you won't even comment on those two things.
Like clockwork. You guys are all so predictable. You can't even have a discussion in good faith because you all won't even acknowledge anything that affects your argument. You aren't fooling anyone.
 
Like clockwork. You guys are all so predictable. You can't even have a discussion in good faith because you all won't even acknowledge anything that affects your argument. You aren't fooling anyone.
Its a solved problem. At this point the only issue is dealing with the malcontents.
 
They're all reporting what Iran says. The only people who believe that are supporters of their terrorist regime (like you).
Iran claimed they attacked Mossad HQs several times over the past years like claiming they captured Mossad agents. It's all the usual MO of a desperate terrorist regime that has to fake success.
They (and you) are being pathetic.
Iran also claims to have shot down three F-35s. Israel denies any have been hit.
 
So far in this thread, I don't see any mainstream new sources being cited, so whether this event actually happened is still unknown.
I am waiting for some harder evidence than a non-descript short video from quite a distance. About a year ago, Iran made big fanfare declaring that it had destroyed Mossad's HQ. The reality turned out to be that they created a small crater in a parking lot. So, while I'm not putting it past their capacity since very clearly their missiles are landing, I think we need more solid confirmation.
 
Weren't they echoing the Bush administration about WMD?
Yes but is that supposed to be an excuse? I don't remember any reporting in mainstream outlets that questioned the narrative.
 
Why would Isreal do exactly what they criticized Hamas of doing?

 
Why would Isreal do exactly what they criticized Hamas of doing?


Mossad's HQ is a compound in a city just like CIA's HQ is.
That's not to be mistaken for a tunnel built underneath a hospital (where Hamas leader was eliminated).
Idiotic.
 
Mossad's HQ is a compound in a city just like CIA's HQ is.
That's not to be mistaken for a tunnel built underneath a hospital (where Hamas leader was eliminated).
Idiotic.
So Isreal did the exact same thing they criticize Hamas for. Its hilarious that you think a tunnel makes it different. They are both putting facilities in public places to use people as human shields.
 
So Isreal did the exact same thing they criticize Hamas for. Its hilarious that you think a tunnel makes it different. They are both putting facilities in public places to use people as human shields.
CIA or Mossad HQ being a building compound in a city is not the same as building tunnels under hospitals, that's nonsensical and reeks of desperation.
 
CIA or Mossad HQ being a building compound in a city is not the same as building tunnels under hospitals, that's nonsensical and reeks of desperation.
Yes it is if they are both near large amounts of people.
 
Yes it is if they are both near large amounts of people.
If one is using targeted weapons he can target at ease a building compound within a city without hurting anyone that's not in it. That cannot be said for targeting a tunnel underneath a hospital or even a specific room in a shared building.
 
And somehow, sanman is cheering for the russians in this situation, too.

In the NBA finals, the Thunder are up on the Pacers 3-2. In that contest, sanman is cheering for the russians.
 
Back
Top Bottom