p-o-l-i-t-i-c-s
iran is kicking his skinny ass
sorry
p-o-l-i-t-i-c-s
iran is kicking his skinny ass
sorry
I bet you Iran could be bowing to Obama's feet asking for mercy and you would still say they are kicking his ass.
why would anyone care what i say
iran is kicking obama's skinny political ass
did you see the cbs headline
when's obama gonna meet with their leaders?
when are we gonna see the results of all the reaching out?
when are putin and hu gonna come on board?
and this guy wonders what folks would say if ahmedinejad kissed someone's feet
LOL!
Caring about what your opponent says is implicit in a debate. Otherwise the whole enterprise fails.
and it's not just iran, remember
his entire domestic agenda 2009 is dead---health care, cap and trade, financial regulatory reform
his improvised post-MA agenda is tiny and 2/3 outta reach---his stimulus which he can't call a stimulus, his bank tax, his debt commission
and foreign policy, forget about it, there aint none
except ESCALATION in afghanistan
sorry it all went so south so fast
he's inept
Maybe Iran is planning to conduct a nuke test during the anniversary of their revolution. Maybe that's the big "punch" to the West they're talking about.
Iran can't produce enough nukes to threaten the existence of human civilization.
Once again, Iran's government has invested a considerable portion of their revenue over the last couple decades into modernizing their economy and improving prosperity. The idea they are willing to "suicide bomb" their country to hurt the West is not a very sound theory.
Iran's government, while tyrannical, cares far more about Iran than the Palestinians and Israel.
Maybe Iran is planning to conduct a nuke test during the anniversary of their revolution. Maybe that's the big "punch" to the West they're talking about.
Iran's idiot leader needs to be removed and then jailed for life ... AFTER HIS BEARD IS FORCEFULLY SHAVED OFF HIS FACE.
For one thing, you are exaggerating Obama's troubles.
Your interpretations as to what extent he has failed are heavily informed by partisanship.
Secondly, the failure of politicians to accomplish certain ends is indicative of problems in the political system
considering the obstacles the United States faces, any good outcomes could be inherently impossible no matter who is in charge.
For one thing, I don't think Obama has failed in Iran.
So far, he's taken the high road and pursued mutually satisfactory arrangements.
Either Iran hasn't lied...
and won't use their nuclear capability to make weapons (and therefore the whole point is moot) or they will and they'll have nothing to justify their broken promise to pursue peaceful applications of the technology to the international community.
Having nuclear weapons can't really help Iran because they can't use them without having the culture, language, people, and religion they cherish being destroyed. The only advantage they get is it discourages invasions, and that's pointless because everybody is already plenty discouraged from attacking Iran, which is why it hasn't happened yet.
a nuclear iran radically alters the geopolitics of not just the region but the entire planet
There would be one less country that's for sure.Good ..and then there'd be one less country the US would invade.
There would be one less country that's for sure.
Seems to me like attempting to get your hands on nukes is a major way to get yourself invaded by the US.Possession of nukes seems to be the only insurance other nations have to prevent the US from invading their territory.
Good ..and then there'd be one less country the US would invade.
Please tell me that was irony, and your view of the situation really isn't that simplistic and one-sided.
Seems to me like attempting to get your hands on nukes is a major way to get yourself invaded by the US.
thanks to the idiot in the white house it's three
School bombing exposes Obama’s secret war inside Pakistan - Times Online
Just as people generally try to win games, people also try to "win" or achieve their interests or goals in competitive situations. However, both in games and in the real world, we generally follow a set of rules to do this. Some games, like some real situations are "winner-take-all." These games are by their nature very competitive, as only one person can win. (Chess would be an example of such a game.) Other games, however, require cooperation to win. Many of the newer video games, for example, require cooperative strategies among multiple players in order for any single player to advance. In the real world, even during times of hostility, rivals generally have common interests and must cooperate to some degree.[1] Even during the Cold War, despite an intense East-West standoff, Moscow and Washington cooperated to achieve their common goal of averting a nuclear war.
..............
The concept of mutual deterrence paved the way for arms-control measures and further cooperation. By highlighting strategic choices and potential collective outcomes, game theory helped illustrate how a potentially destructive relationship could be framed, managed, and transformed to provide mutual benefits, including avoidance of an uncontrolled arms race and nuclear war.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?