• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Iowa Poll: Kamala Harris leapfrogs Donald Trump to take lead near Election Day

Juggernaut74 said:
I would be so proud of my fellow Iowans to see us in the blue column again.
Click to expand...
Tell the folks here about the three congressional races, and Iowans rebelling against Reynolds.
We’ll be out over Thanksgiving, but won’t be talking politics with my farmer in-laws.
 
Todays polling is all over the place. They used to be conducted the same and except for Fox the results were pretty much the same. This is no longer true. Do some research. With the disappearance of land lines things have changed. They all have different ways of doing their research now. The results show this and they can vary widely.
 
Harris being ahead anywhere would be good news were it not for what the *rump camp will do with that news -- dead people voting, ballot stuffing, votes for *rump being counted for Harris, election corruption, stolen election, fake ballots, alien lasers brainwashing voters -- It's all so soul sucking tiresome.
 
I’m not thinking that administering a snarlin to a microphone will help things………
 
A poll that takes a snapshot in time (that’s what polls do) and gets a 49/43 result and at the end of an election the results are 45/47 is not necessarily wrong.

What almost all polls are predicting is a close race with Harris having very slight popular vote lead and the electoral college prediction a virtual tie.
 
Iowa used to be 1/3 D, 1/3 R, and 1/3 I as long as I’ve been going there since 1984.
After Obama won it twice, Branstad came back for a 2nd 8-year governorship.
That is what flipped Iowa to Trump, who promised Branstad the ambassadorship to China.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
The Des Moines Register poll was conducted between 10/28 and 10/31.

What more recent poll showing Traitor Trump with a 9 point lead in Iowa are you referring to?

Post link.
Click to expand...
You can see it here, the Emerson College poll from Nov 1/2
 
There's another poll that has Trump with a 10+ lead in Iowa. I'm afraid this is hopium and a false positive. But maybe Iowa shocks the world on election day
 
I'm hoping this is true and we can be rid of the orange degenerate for good.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
You’re missing the point.

It is a statewide poll of Iowans by the Des Moines Register

It is no “outlier”.
Click to expand...
It doesn't matter if it's statewide or who conducted it. There's always a risk of an outlier.
 
This is especially interesting that from what I hear there wasn't a lot of money put into Iowa by the democrats.
 
I wouldn't trust a poll as far as I could throw a house. I predict it will be a landslide for Harris.
 
It would be hilarious if it actually happened.
 
EnigmaO01 said:
This is especially interesting that from what I hear there wasn't a lot of money put into Iowa by the democrats.
Click to expand...

Neither side has done anything there since the primaries.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
And why would they, right?
Click to expand...
It might have been a good thing for D money to stay away, with three at-risk GOP Reps.
Iowa farmers and related small businesses haven’t forgotten how badly they were hurt by Trump’s tariffs.
Let GOP Gov. Reynolds sink with women with her support of DeSantis and the 6-week abortion ban.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…