Ron Mars
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2011
- Messages
- 1,194
- Reaction score
- 170
- Location
- Central Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
We didn't hire the woman, and prior to 2008 we didn't hire minorities for the job either.
If anybody can apply for the job but you only hire certain kinds of people and your parameters aren't matters of record, that's the definition of an unwritten policy.
They kinda broke the story and let everyone else, including Rep Issa, know about it. Is that a good job?
Idk, but it was the AP that got the documents that revealed this practice, a journalist named Ted Bridis did it.It's good for AP.
Who else is doing a good job reporting this?
If you believe that then so be it. I don't like where this is going.
Here in Virginia we had an excellent State Senator, Governor, and later the Mayor of Richmond.
We were talking about the Presidency of the United States.
If you want me to look anything else up for you, I might.
In the country today as you clarified earlier.
You're basically arguing that what has already happened is impossible.
Kinda silly.
No, not really. You started off arguing that this country doesn't have a well-defined pattern of traits common to the Presidents it elects,
and then you tried to broaden the discussion to elections across the nation.
Do a victory dance if it helps, but you're still wrong.
He was ineffective in stopping the meltdown and for that he deserves his share of criticism.
And I stated that I thought you meant in the country today and you replied back that in fact you did.
I completely agree that as late as the 70's a non-white male Christian would stand little chance to be elected President.
For the past three decades IMO that has not been the case.
CNN generally has been neutral (people who want to dispute this. Quite frankly I couldn't care about your opinion, just because CNN doesn't accuse Obama of being a Kenyan socialist)
.
Of course I did. We were talking about the Presidency of the United States, right? :lol:
That's great and all, except that, up until 2008, the Presidents we in fact elected pretty much blow your opinion away, and even then most of the unwritten policy items I mentioned are still in place -- as I've now said multiple times.
The largest union representing federal government workers may sue the Obama administration if there’s a government shutdown at the end of this week.
With a shutdown looking increasingly likely by the hour as congressional Republicans and the White House stay stuck at an impasse, the president of the American Federation of Government Employees says the union will file suit against the federal government if it’s not clear that essential employees will be guaranteed pay for their work during the shutdown.
AFGE has already filed one lawsuit against the federal government over a possible shutdown. Last week, after not hearing back on Freedom of Information Act requests made to the White House Office of Management and Budget for details of how government agencies will handle the shutdown, the union sued OMB Director Jack Lew. “It’s inside baseball with the Obama administration about the lack of information coming from the agencies,” Gage said.
wow. the union wants to be assured that employees who work will get paidtoday: another lawsuit over administration stonewalling of foia
and this time it's by the PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYEES
Federal workers? union preps government shutdown lawsuit - Jennifer Epstein - POLITICO.com
see a pattern? oh yes, another pointless matter raised within a string of anti Obama threadsso far we've seen the ASSOCIATED PRESS and BLOOMBERG go after dhs' political screening (which the dept's own INSPECTOR GENERAL called out as UNPRECEDENTED) of foia requests and bernanke's concealment of exactly how much TARP went to exactly which FOREIGN entities...
notice a PATTERN?
TRANSPARENCY, anyone?
by subscribing to the message of that saying, it can only be concluded that you stand for nothing. is that transparent enough for youstand for something or fall for anything
“We’ve asked the Obama administration how they would guarantee employees’ pay, what the conditions are for essential employees to be paid,” John Gage, president of the 265,000-member union, told POLITICO on Wednesday. “Should essential employees be required to work without a guarantee of pay, we will file a lawsuit.”
The shutdown battle is “more political theater than anything else,” Gage said, and it’s “deeply disturbing when people don’t know whether they’re going to be able to make a mortgage or pay their bills.” Government workers, he said, need more clarity about whether they’ll be required to work and whether they’ll be paid for that work.
His request for more information has gone to Attorney General Eric Holder and to Office of Personnel Management Director John Berry. Late Tuesday night, OPM published a brief overview of how a shutdown would work. Federal agencies do not have the authority to pay employees during a shutdown. Workers “excepted” during the shutdown would be paid for their work once the president signs a new appropriations bill or a continuing resolution, OPM said, but it’s up to agencies to determine who is excepted and who isn’t. Workers who are “non-excepted,” or furloughed, “are not permitted to work as unpaid volunteers for the government.”
AFGE has already filed one lawsuit against the federal government over a possible shutdown. Last week, after not hearing back on Freedom of Information Act requests made to the White House Office of Management and Budget for details of how government agencies will handle the shutdown, the union sued OMB Director Jack Lew. “It’s inside baseball with the Obama administration about the lack of information coming from the agencies,” Gage said.
the IG said it was unprecedented for an agency head to be so involved in processing of FOIA requests
a competent government official now exerting effort to assure that her department is well run
The report from DHS Acting Inspector General Charles Edwards did not allege corruption, but did say the department must make changes.
“We also determined that the Office of the Secretary has had unprecedented involvement in the Freedom of Information Act process beginning in 2009,” the IG report said. “For several hundred requests deemed significant, components were required to provide for headquarters review all materials they intended to release.”
The IG report also says, “Potentially embarrassing wording was redacted in other cases as well. In November 2009, a senior DHS official suggested limitations on the release of particular requests that a component was processing.”
keep em coming
U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s two-year fight to shield crisis-squeezed banks from the stigma of revealing their public loans protected a lender to local governments in Belgium, a Japanese fishing-cooperative financier and a company part-owned by the Central Bank of Libya.
Once again this conservative persecution complex springs up again.
Jesus.
It's like conservatives are under the impression that during the Bush Years ever single news channel on planet earth (minus Fox News) was bashing Bush 24/7 when really, things were just in reverse as they were today.
MSNBC generally was against Bush, for Obama
CNN generally has been neutral (people who want to dispute this. Quite frankly I couldn't care about your opinion, just because CNN doesn't accuse Obama of being a Kenyan socialist)
Fox News was for Bush and against Obama.
Oh well.
I swear, Americans when their guy isn't in power, can turn into the biggest ****ing whiners on planet Earth, never in my entire life has I heard THIS MUCH bitching and whining and moaning and complaining. Holy mother of god.
Yes Obama said his administration would be transparent, but in the end he's a politician, to try and slam him on breaking his promises is as redundant as saying Hitler was a bad guy (Yeaaaaaah godwinning for kicks).
In the end. The world will continue to spin and politicians will continue to be politicians.
Politicians are like diapers, their contents are the same, and they should be replaced very, very often.
Another classless post attempting to protect the corrupt.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?