- Joined
- Jan 6, 2007
- Messages
- 4,829
- Reaction score
- 1,223
- Location
- beneath the surface
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
The welfare of the child as a compelling state interest.
This can only be said if you do not understand my point.
I am talking about the PARTICULAR hadships of the mulatto, not the COMMON harships faces by everyone. Discussing the COMMON harships means nothing.
Nope. On the contrary, do you deny that poor children face particular hardships, as opposed to wealthy children?
I find it wildly ironic that someone who believes the "state" has no business in their health care decisions, yet is some what defending the notion that the "state" has the authority to approve marriage based on potential hardships of potential offspring.
Why dont YOU tell ME.Alright, what particular hardships do they face that are not found in other cultures?
Why dont YOU tell ME.
You, yourtself said that you faces harships particular to your status as a mulatto, so you would know better than I.
The welfare of the child is a compelling state interest that superceeds any number of other rights -- under what argument is marriage a right excluded from its control?I find it wildly ironic that someone who believes the "state" has no business in their health care decisions, yet is some what defending the notion that the "state" has the authority to approve marriage based on potential hardships of potential offspring.
Why dont YOU tell ME.
You, yourtself said that you faces harships particular to your status as a mulatto, so you would know better than I.
Given that you already said you where Chinese, it should be obvious that I am using the term 'mulatto' in its more generic 'mixed race' form, you ignorant schmutz.I'm Chinese American you illiterate fool.
That depends:I faced hardships by not being mulatto growing up. I was one of three white boys in a school of 600 students.
Should my two white parents have been denied marriage because of my potential hardships?
I faced hardships by not being mulatto growing up. I was one of three white boys in a school of 600 students.
Should my two white parents have been denied marriage because of my potential hardships?
The welfare of the child is a compelling state interest that superceeds any number of other rights -- under what argument is marriage a right excluded from its control?
Given tha you already said you where CHinese, it should be obvious that I am using the term 'mulatto' in its more generic 'mixed race' form, you ignorant schmutz.
News flash:News flash....
You do not have to be married to have children. The fact that you are attempting to pigeon hole state authority into citizens lives is amazingly full of ****.
Well then -- you dont have any of the "partucular" hardships I'm discussing, as they are 'particular' to mixed-race children, and as such, your experiences dont illustrate anything.Both my parents are Chinese, I'm not mixed at all. You're ignorance is showing. I'm Chinese American because I was born in the US.
Alright, what particular hardships do they face that are not found in other cultures?
Did you decide to not try to turn this into a discussion about the 2nd amendment, or were you going to get back to that?Did you have red hair? I would beaten you up if you were one of those evil carrot tops. Damn carrot tops. J/K
Well then -- you dont have any of the "partucular" hardships I'm discussing, as they are 'particular' to mixed-race children, and as such, your experiences dont illustrate anything.
Well then -- you dont have any of the "partucular" hardships I'm discussing, as they are 'particular' to mixed-race children, and as such, your experiences dont illustrate anything.
I'm sorry -- do you NOT think that mixed race kids often face promlems and issues based on their being of mixed race - issues and problems that full-race kids don't?YOU haven't discuss any "particular" hardships at all in the first place. Why don't you actually talk about these "particular" hardships?
The mere fact that having children isn't a right granted or controlled by the government.That depends:
The welfare of the child is a compelling state interest that superceeds any number of other rights -- under what argument is marriage a right excluded from its control?
I don't even support same-race marriage on the basis of equality.
I simply do not care if you have a 'right'. If you shouldn't do it, you shouldn't do it. If you do it anyway and it becomes a problem, I would support removing your 'right' as you apparently can't use it appropriately anyway.
News flash:
You didnt answer the question, and therefore you have not addressed my argument.
I'm sorry -- do you NOT think that mixed race kids often face promlems and issues based on their being of mixed race - issues and problems that full-race kids don't?
Seems to me like this is common knowledge. Do I also need to show you that water freezes when it gets cold?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?