• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Impeachment trial over at this point

The evidence is the fact the Republicans have refused to do anything for Trump, except bend over for him, since the 2018.

It’s because he’s a billionaire and they fear what he could do to them financially as well as their careers. Another reason electing this megalomaniac was a disaster. One tweet from him could set the stock market realing as well as cost individual share holders millions.

He has repeatedly openly threatened corporations, businesses, CEO’s the media.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Obviously informed enough not to try and ram an impeachment process in 78 days. You?

Talk to Pelosi who actually wasn’t for this impeachment but couldn’t stop the crying from the progressives. Again Congress is not a criminal court. I stand by that fact not your identity politics rant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Obviously informed enough not to try and ram an impeachment process in 78 days. You?
Well that’s a great point but I believe there were multiple reasons including an up coming election as to why this was But you can ask Pelosi who actually wasn’t for this impeachment but couldn’t stop the crying from the progressives. Again Congress is not a criminal court. I stand by that fact not your identity politics rant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
None the less, the demorat House majority made it happen.

So you think a 78 day impeachment process with 2 weeks of hearings with a partisan vote that is failing in the Senate is something to brag about?

I guess to each his own.
 
Corruption is a crime. The democrats would impeach Trump for corruption in a heartbeat.

Why not ? If the Republicans had the edge I’m sure they would have invented something to try and impeach Obama which they threatened to many times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Trump is going to have fun at the SOTU, doing a victory speech literally in the faces of the people who tried to bring him down.

I hope he humiliates them all and serves them right. Don't pick an impeachment fight you can't win.
 
Well that’s a great point but I believe there were multiple reasons including an up coming election as to why this was But you can ask Pelosi who actually wasn’t for this impeachment but couldn’t stop the crying from the progressives. Again Congress is not a criminal court. I stand by that fact not your identity politics rant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Again Congress is not a criminal court? Whats you point?
 
Obviously informed enough not to try and ram an impeachment process in 78 days. You?

I think the Democrats knew that the Party of Trump Senate would never convict. Their plea was not to Trump or the Party of Trump but to We, the People in hopes of convincing the majority to vote for the nation, not a cult of personalty this November.


3na1fc.jpg
 
No, they put on their entire case. Demanding witnesses they have not deposed and have no idea what they will say is not part of 'their case.' They wanted the senate to help them BUILD a case. Thats not the senates job. That should have been done by the House BEFORE the impeachment vote. The democrats 'case' is what they developed in the House and included in their articles. That they were free to present and they did. So it was totally fair. You just dont like it because you didnt get the result you wanted. Next time demand your side do a better job in preparing rather than whining when you dont get your way.

The case was well established and presented in Congress to the point Trumps defense switched from “ a perfect call “ to it doesn’t matter wasn’t a crime. Please are you serious?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Again Congress is not a criminal court? Whats you point?

I think it's to point out that all of the "due process" and other shenanigans the Party of Trump has regurgitated over the past several months has nothing to do with a Constitutional impeachment.
 
I think the Democrats knew that the Party of Trump Senate would never convict. Their plea was not to Trump or the Party of Trump but to We, the People in hopes of convincing the majority to vote for the nation, not a cult of personalty this November.

So you knew the Senate wasn't going to buy it up front but you were depending on the American people to be dumb enough?

We know.
 
I think it's to point out that all of the "due process" and other shenanigans the Party of Trump has regurgitated over the past several months has nothing to do with a Constitutional impeachment.

Oh, Now I get it. Since its not a criminal court, nobody deserves any due process and other shenanigans.
 
So you knew the Senate wasn't going to buy it up front but you were depending on the American people to be dumb enough?

We know.

On the contrary; I think the Party of Trump is dumb enough but the other 70-80% of American voters to be smart enough to see the truth.

Oh, Now I get it. Since its not a criminal court, nobody deserves any due process and other shenanigans.

Correct. It's a Constitutional procedure, not a Perry Mason or Matlock trial.
 
Oh, Now I get it. Since its not a criminal court, nobody deserves any due process and other shenanigans.

do you get it? here it is: its political when it works in their favor, and its criminal.. when it works in their favor.
 
No, they put on their entire case. Demanding witnesses they have not deposed and have no idea what they will say is not part of 'their case.' They wanted the senate to help them BUILD a case. Thats not the senates job. That should have been done by the House BEFORE the impeachment vote. The democrats 'case' is what they developed in the House and included in their articles. That they were free to present and they did. So it was totally fair. You just dont like it because you didnt get the result you wanted. Next time demand your side do a better job in preparing rather than whining when you dont get your way.

The case was well established and presented in Congress to the point Trumps defense switched from “ a perfect call “ to it doesn’t matter wasn’t a crime. Please are you serious?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
...annnnd another Trump supporter immediately goes for the personal attack when someone speaks badly about Herr Trump. Sad.

You didnt 'speak badly' about Trump, you insulted his supporters. Try and be honest. If you can.
 
Honestly I don’t trust polls and doubt Sanders has wide support among Dems especially moderates. All Trump has to do is paint him as a socialist and he’s toast. Cake walk for Trump and why he truly fears Biden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Honestly I don’t trust polls and doubt Sanders has wide support among Dems especially moderates. All Trump has to do is paint him as a socialist and he’s toast. Cake walk for Trump and why he truly fears Biden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

then the dems are toast, because all he has to do with Biden is let him speak.

"c'mon , man"
 
You didnt 'speak badly' about Trump, you insulted his supporters. Try and be honest. If you can.

Okay, so how does insulting Republicans, Democrats, the Party of Trump, frickin' Nazis or any other group justify personal attacks in violation of forum rules?

....and thanks for the additional insult since it proves my point.
 
I'm not super keen on Sanders, but I think Larry David playing him on SNL may be worth it, lol.

Honestly can’t freakin stand him and he has a serious issue with women. He has said some possible misogynistic things about women and agree with Warren as to what he supposedly said about her. That’s why I’m going with Buttigieg.

Hard for the “ me too “ crowed to destroy him lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
On the contrary; I think the Party of Trump is dumb enough but the other 70-80% of American voters to be smart enough to see the truth.



Correct. It's a Constitutional procedure, not a Perry Mason or Matlock trial.

And that is why you failed. Go back to law school, learn your ABC's of due process, then get back to us. Until then, conviction denied.

Kind of speaks for itself, huh.
 
I have learned not to engage Trumpers who are obviously poorly educated it’s a no win situation. If they can present a logical argument then sure I will entertain them. Best option is to not engage JMO.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Then there is no reason for you to be here.
 
The case was well established and presented in Congress to the point Trumps defense switched from “ a perfect call “ to it doesn’t matter wasn’t a crime. Please are you serious?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Saying it was a perfect call and that it wasnt a crime is the same argument :roll:

Oh and welcome to the forum :)
 
Honestly I don’t trust polls and doubt Sanders has wide support among Dems especially moderates. All Trump has to do is paint him as a socialist and he’s toast. Cake walk for Trump and why he truly fears Biden.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agreed. Bernie and many other candidates are seen as too far Left by most Independents. It's just another reason why I think Trump will be reelected: the Democrats don't have anyone who is clearly superior.
 
Back
Top Bottom