Thread: I'm not saying that 9/11 was an inside job, but...
Here we have yet another time-wasting thread that will accomplish nothing.
Why do people post bull**** like this?
Actually...Yes, you are.
Guess what...We really did land on the moon, No one lived on Mars, Mermaids are not real, and Aliens were not cut up for autopsy.
Pretty sure there is not a population of manlike apes in the woods either.
Or maybe it just looks like what buildings look like when they fall down. It just so happens our main frame of reference are the hundreds of well documented planned demolitions that have been conducted over the years.
My point is that if you put the building 7 destruction in a compilation video of controlled demolitions, and you saw it in the video, if you didn't know it was building 7, you probably wouldn't give it a second thought.
Why is this controversial?
Well, it's controversial because it is heresy in modern America. It contradicts the story told by known liars in government.
As Orwell pointed out, in a time of universal deception, speaking the truth is a radical act.
False.
I don't believe it was an inside job necessarily. What I AM saying is that Building 7 collapse looks like a controlled demolition. Because it does.
If you showed me verified video of a moon landing, I would say "Hey that looks like a moon landing, so I believe it!". Because it looks like a moon landing and it was confirmed to be actual footage.
Building 7 collapse looks like a controlled demolition. That's all I'm saying.
Building 7 going down looked like a controlled demolition.
Not saying it was, but it really looks like one.
I believe in things that have evidence. People may disagree about evidence, but there is zero hard evidence that 9/11 was a controlled demolition. Period.
Building 7 going down looked like a controlled demolition.
Not saying it was, but it really looks like one.
False.
I don't believe it was an inside job necessarily. What I AM saying is that Building 7 collapse looks like a controlled demolition. Because it does.
If you showed me verified video of a moon landing, I would say "Hey that looks like a moon landing, so I believe it!". Because it looks like a moon landing and it was confirmed to be actual footage.
Building 7 collapse looks like a controlled demolition. That's all I'm saying.
It might bear some resemblance, but it wasn't.
If it was a controlled demolition, it had to be an inside job, whether you want to say it or not, there's no way around that. I understand your reluctance to say it was. Hell you don't want to be ridiculed by anonymous posters in a mostly anonymous forum, that's way too embarrassing, right?
It takes weeks to plan and rig a CD, especially of a 47 story steel frame tower, and then conveniently execute it on 9/11 (?). That means obvious foreknowledge that 9/11 was going to take place.