anti-abiding
Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2009
- Messages
- 179
- Reaction score
- 21
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Murder definition: To put and end to; to destroy
Following this definition as a rule of principle, being that it has been around since the beginning of society, we can view this topic with a clearance, an understanding of what we are fighting for.
So is the removal of a small cluster of cells considered murder? Can it be justified as the removal of a figure head in this world, a cannibalism of our kind? Most would say that to remove
these grouped tissues is like removing layers of skin off of our bodies, the baby won't feel it, it isn't even a baby yet, and it is better for the mother instead of waiting nine stressful months for something you don't want.
But it was all the mother's fault, shouldn't she be responsible and go through with the pregnancy? The baby had no say in the fact that she stayed with a man, that was the mothers choice, and she had to accept the consequences of relation, which means, it was also the mothers choice to become pregnant, not the baby's, shouldn't she also except the consequence of becoming pregnant just like she excepted the consequence of having an enjoyable night? She knew what she was heading into, is it ethically right to avoid consequences? No! Does it make the society morally stronger and high on the values? No! Can it corrupt the world in the sense of snuffed out future generations and future Einsteins? Yes! Does the child that had no choice in what his mother did, have a choice in what she will do? No! Why? Because the mother can only see HER well-being, that is what she saw that night of her first decision, that is what she saw when she took the pills, that is the only thing that she can see, she's blind to others, and she's taking her baby's vision into darkness with her.
Following this definition as a rule of principle, being that it has been around since the beginning of society, we can view this topic with a clearance, an understanding of what we are fighting for.
So is the removal of a small cluster of cells considered murder? Can it be justified as the removal of a figure head in this world, a cannibalism of our kind? Most would say that to remove
these grouped tissues is like removing layers of skin off of our bodies, the baby won't feel it, it isn't even a baby yet, and it is better for the mother instead of waiting nine stressful months for something you don't want.
But it was all the mother's fault, shouldn't she be responsible and go through with the pregnancy? The baby had no say in the fact that she stayed with a man, that was the mothers choice, and she had to accept the consequences of relation, which means, it was also the mothers choice to become pregnant, not the baby's, shouldn't she also except the consequence of becoming pregnant just like she excepted the consequence of having an enjoyable night? She knew what she was heading into, is it ethically right to avoid consequences? No! Does it make the society morally stronger and high on the values? No! Can it corrupt the world in the sense of snuffed out future generations and future Einsteins? Yes! Does the child that had no choice in what his mother did, have a choice in what she will do? No! Why? Because the mother can only see HER well-being, that is what she saw that night of her first decision, that is what she saw when she took the pills, that is the only thing that she can see, she's blind to others, and she's taking her baby's vision into darkness with her.
