• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If you support the government flying the confederate flag......

Which would you support on federal or state property?


  • Total voters
    42

(continued)


racism bolded...
 

(continued)


racism bolded...
 
(continued)



racism bolded...

FFFFFEEEEEEEEAAAAARRRR! FEAR those SCAAAARRRY Black Panthers!

All the few thousand of them.

As of 2009, the NBPP claimed a few thousand members organized in 45 chapters, while independent estimates by the Anti-Defamation League suggest that the group is much smaller but is nevertheless able to attract a large turnout of non-members (some of whom may not even realize what this group actually stands for) to its events by focusing on specific issues of local interest.

Whereas when it comes to right-wing militias:

Radical anti-government "patriot" groups and militias, galvanized against gun control, will continue to grow even as the number of groups operating in the USAreached an all-time high in 2012, a report Tuesday by the Southern Poverty Law Center finds.

The center tracked 1,360 radical militias and anti-government groups in 2012, an eightfold increase over 2008, when it recorded 149 such groups. The explosive growth began four years ago, sparked by the election of President Obama and anger about the poor economy, the center says. That growth is likely to continue as the groups recruit more members with a pro-gun message, the center's senior fellow Mark Potok said.


But remember, kids - y'all really shouldn't worry about 1300+ anti-government 'patriot' groups (oxymoron alert!), each with tens or scores of members! Y'all just need to worry about that ONE group of scary black guys.

And kids! Just ignore the fact that right-wing militia groups have a long history of committing just about every felony on the books, from smuggling and rape and murder up to and including bombings (plural) - all you really need to know is that those Really Scary Black Guys in the New Black Panther Party were ALLEGED to have intimidated voters ONCE (with no firearms in sight).

Just remember, it's unAmerican to watch out for those right-wing militia groups no matter what they do ('cause Patriotism!), but it's our solemn duty as American citizens to warn all and sundry about the New Black Panther Party, even if they haven't been convicted of anything at all....
 
Racism bolded....

Do you think it would be difficult for me to find examples of racism with the confederate flag? Confederate state declarations over the years? And while some people view it that way, I am sure some view it as a symbol of pride and heritage for their race. Sound familiar?
 

Not fear, FACTS. The BPs are a racist organization. Their very identity is based on race and race related ideas.
 

Examples are easy to find, but what I posted are the core beliefs of the BP and the flag that was shown ONLY represents them and their beliefs. The BFoC represents no specific group and it represents a wide variety of beliefs that those who want to fly it believe in. These beliefs range from being a "Dukes of Hazard" fan to racism to declaration of opposition against oppression.
 
Not fear, FACTS. The BPs are a racist organization. Their very identity is based on race and race related ideas.

Yeah, be skeeeered of that ONE racist organization, but don't y'all pay no nevermind to the dozens of strictly white-supremacist racist organizations now, y'hear?

The New Black Panthers were alleged - but not convicted - of voter intimidation (with no firearm being reported, mind you). This appears to be the one and ONLY crime they are alleged to have committed.

When it comes to white supremacists, however, here's just ONE example: the Aryan Brotherhood of Texas:

The various white gangs, with names like the Aryan Society and the Aryan Brothers, mostly adopted a relatively crude white supremacist ideology. In the early to mid-1980s, most of the members of these two gangs united to become the Aryan Brotherhood of Texas, while others left out of the merger later helped form the rival Aryan Circle prison gang. From its beginning, the ABT emerged as one of the most violent gangs in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, committing 13 murders in 1984-1985 alone.[6]

In March 1985, prospect Virgil Barfield carried out an Aryan Brotherhood of Texas order to kill Calvin Massey. Barfield stabbed Massey 42 times. The violent attack was caught on camera. The video clip helped prosecutors to convict Barfield in the murder of Massey. Virgil Barfield was sentenced to life in prison.[7]

In 2001, Mark Stroman received the death penalty for his killing spree on Middle Eastern people. He claimed it was a retaliation for the September 11 terrorist attacks. However all three people that he target were of South Asian descent.[8][9][10]

On September 21st, 2006, gangs members of the ABT, were charged in the death of a young woman named Breanna Taylor. According to investigations from the authorities, Taylor was tortured, sexually assaulted, and murder by ABT gang members. After she was killed by ABT gang members, they poured acid on her body, and then put her body in a tub, poured cement and dumped it into a river. Dale Jameton pleaded guilty and received a life sentence, and Jennifer McClellan was sentenced to 20 years in prison.


Hm. Murdered 13 people in just 84-85, and as late as 2006 tortured a woman to death...

...but don't worry about them, now, 'cause they're WHITE. Y'all just be real careful about them scaaaaary black people, 'cause rumor has it they might stand by a door to a polling place. They won't say nothin', just stand there...and that's worse than ANY number of murders that those fine law-abidin' white folks might ever commit!
 

Just because of arguments like this, we should have the following standards...

- Federal flies the US flag,
- States fly the federal and their state flags,
- Cities fly the federal, state, and their city flag (if they have one)

Easy peasy.
 
I must have been sleeping through the history class where we learned about the Black Power States of America.
 
Both groups should just fly this flag and problem solved. I can't imagine anyone possibly objecting to it.

You are not offending enough folks with that flag.





Try this one.






 
TRANSLATED ANSWER: No, it was not racism, but an act of legal commerce.
Whether or not it was dehumanizing to those who were not considered human is irrelevant to the fact that is was an act of legal commerce and not based on hatred or racism.


When black folks in this country owned slaves was that racism?
I don’t think so, no.
Exactly.
It was an act of legal commerce and not based on hatred or racism.


But, to answer your question, when you’re a conquering army you don’t need to morally justify anything. You can pretty much do what you want.
Conquering army? I did not mention any such invasion by an army, as that was not the capturing and enslaving I was talking about.
There is a much wider scope involved here. These folk attacked ships and sailed up the coasts invading villages and taking their slaves.
While you can call them invaders, it wasn't an army at war.


I don’t see that situation analogous to that of blacks in the U.S.
The point is that the act of slavery in that specific was not based on racism just as the others are not.

It was an act not based on hatred or racism.
Which is the whole point of the questions. The answers show that others thinking it represented hate and racism as something that came later, as the institution of slavery did not represent that.

Wanting to keep a legal institution legal (slavery), wasn't just the driving force as you say, but the basis of it. Not hate and racism.
 
This is really getting silly now:


But Steam :allhail comes to the rescue:

 
Here in SD we have tribal symbols on public buildings, like a religious totem poll at one of the highschools; and natives lost that war too.
 
TRANSLATED ANSWER: No, it was not racism, but an act of legal commerce.
Whether or not it was dehumanizing to those who were not considered human is irrelevant to the fact that is was an act of legal commerce and not based on hatred or racism.

Yeah, but we're really talking about the flag, not slavery. I mean, why would Georgia, for example, put a huge Confederate Battle Flag on its state flag in 1956, almost 100 years after slavery ended? The fact is you had a lot of white folks who didn't like blacks in their schools, restaurants, hotels, parks, etc, and they wanted to send a message to the country and federal government that no one was going to tell them how they should treat their niggers.


Okay, I thought you were referring to the Moorish invasion of the Iberian Peninsula, but, be that as it may, you're engaging in a distinction without a difference. Whether the people were enslaved with an army or a naval incursion or landing force is irrelevant to my point, which was the invader depended on military force and had no interest in the moral aspect of slavery.
 
Essential truth.
 
Since the other person hasn't replied, is there anyone else who would like to answer the questions posed?

It is racist only to the extent that a people of one race assumed power over the people of another race. They did so for economic or sometimes political purposes, not because they hated the people just because they were of a different race. It was racist because they considered those they enslaved inferior to themselves. If it was a matter of hate, they would have simply tried to kill or remove the race they hated.

IMO we as a people have so politicized and polarized the issue of racism that many now assign 'racism' to what is in no way racist and fail to see what is racist in what they themselves promote or support.

And more sadly, the tendency is to demand that others support our sociopolitical views or else they are targeted to be demonized and, if possible, crushed. Such is a very unhealthy thing for a people who presumably value liberty. Such as people not being allowed to assign their own interpretation of the Confederate flag and declared racist if they do not see it in the politically correct definition.
 
Last edited:

You're spot on. Frankly, I'm a little disturbed by the growing tendency of corporations to throw their economic weight around in all manner of political affairs. One example is Univision's decision to drop the Miss Universe Pageant because Donald Trump flapped his lips. Trump owns the pageant with NBC. So what was NBC's sin? Guilt by association? And why punish the people whose livelihoods depend on it? Another example is this decision by Apple to drop games with the Battle Flag in them. The developer of Ultimate General: Gettysburg makes some good points:


So Apple apparently wants him to remove the flag from the game, but the game developer is prepared to tell Apple to take a hike. Bully for him, and shame on Apple.
 

I do not have a problem with parades and museums having other countries flags and special interest groups flags.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…