I'm sure to be beaten over the head by the hordes of people who can't possibly understand traditional beliefs, but so be it.
^^^^^It's not that we/they don't understand, it's that we believe that your subjective views shouldn't dictate what is legal / illegal for the rest of us.
I pretty much see it the way P/N does.
This does not mean I don't want homosexuals and lesbians to have the same protections under the law, or hate someone who is gay in any way.
I have no problem with civil unions, but as I have said before I do not see it as a marriage.
But your subjective views should dictate what is legal/illegal.:roll::roll::roll:
It's not that we/they don't understand, it's that we believe that your subjective views shouldn't dictate what is legal / illegal for the rest of us.
But your subjective views should dictate what is legal/illegal.:roll::roll:
I'm gonna go with 'normal' as my response. I'm a traditionalist who believes in the sanctity of marriage and of family. I'm sure to be beaten over the head by the hordes of people who can't possibly understand traditional beliefs, but so be it.
I'm gonna go with 'normal' as my response. I'm a traditionalist who believes in the sanctity of marriage and of family. I'm sure to be beaten over the head by the hordes of people who can't possibly understand traditional beliefs, but so be it.
Granted you have your beliefs but I do not think the law/state should have beliefs.
And that is my belief
If the people are not the "state" who is?
Gays are a part of the people as well. Should their beliefs dominate? Oh wait they are not fighting for gay marriage only to be recognized by the State:doh
It should not be recognized by the state as the state has no interest in unions that cannot produce offspring.
If a civil union will give gay couples the same rights benefits etc as a heterosexual married couple, whats the difference?
It should not be recognized by the state as the state has no interest in unions that cannot produce offspring.
If a civil union will give gay couples the same rights benefits etc as a heterosexual married couple, whats the difference?
Let me know when infertile heterosexual couples are barred from State recognition of their marriages and then you might have something.
First I noticed you ignored the real meat of my post, typical really.
As for your question, I would have no problem with that.
Since when is procreation a requirement for marriage?
What meat? You want to play childish semantics?
BTW I edited my post.
First I noticed you ignored the real meat of my post, typical really.
As for your question, I would have no problem with that.
It's not, but it is the only reason the state really has any interest in marriage at all.
Childish semantics? :lol:
Nice doge.
If their is no difference what is your problem?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?