• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If you find gay/trans perverted, why?

CLAX1911 said:
Then you're essentially telling me that leprechauns are real.

No I didn't.

What other kind of gametes would fertilize eggs?

Something is if the egg is fertilized it was done by a small gaming that came from a male.

I didn't mention fertility this is a red herring

Sexuality is not related to biological sex.

And you are feeling to answer.

Light sexuality isn't binary you can be gay you can be by you can be straight you can have no interest in it at all I never said sexuality was binary sex is binary.

What is not binary sex or sexuality?

If she gave birth then she's not male males can't do that.
Click to expand...
She is 95% male. So, she doesn't fit your binary box that all are 100% male or female.
End of story. Leprechauns and all.
 
CLAX1911 said:
It did not.

So show me a different kind of gamete besides a sperm that fertilizes an egg.

No the ability to fertilize has no effect on the ability to produce sperm or the potential to produce sperm.

For example if someone with ovaries has no potential to ever produce sperm

So what you're not making a counterpoint 100% of eggs ever and existence that were fertilized where fertilized by sperm and nothing else.

My definition mentions nothing about fertility that's a red herring

It is you had to make a red herring to pretend that it wasn't you failed.

Just so you know the definition I posted was the dictionary definition so you're saying words are wrong and the way we use languages incorrect which is something you can say but it doesn't mean anything.
Click to expand...
You claim male is one that has sperm capable of fertilizing a female egg.
Which is true for many.
However, there are several men that are infertile and can't fertilize a female egg. Either your definition is wrong. Or they are not male per your definition.

End of story.
 
dairyair said:
She is 95% male.
Click to expand...
What does that mean how can you be 95% male? You produce 19/20ths of a sperm
dairyair said:
So, she doesn't fit your binary box that all are 100% male or female.
Click to expand...
Well you're referring to her as she so yes she does.
dairyair said:
End of story. Leprechauns and all.
Click to expand...
Maybe in the future don't shoot yourself in the foot by referring to someone as she if you're going to make the argument that they're not really a she.
 
dairyair said:
You claim male is one that has sperm capable of fertilizing a female egg.
Click to expand...
No. I posted a definition of the word male.

male
/māl/
adjective
Of, relating to, or designating the sex that has organs to produce spermatozoa for fertilizing ova.

If you had the organs that are associated with the production of sperm regardless of whether the sperm ever fertilizes an egg that means your mail.


dairyair said:
Which is true for many.
However, there are several men that are infertile and can't fertilize a female egg.
Click to expand...
Do they have a vagina or a penis and testicles? One would be the organs that produce sperm or that would be associated with the production of sperm and the other set of organs would not.

It doesn't matter if the sperm is infertile or if there's no sperm at all if you have the structures that would be associated with it that makes you male.
dairyair said:
Either your definition is wrong.
Click to expand...
Your beef then is with the dictionary because that's where I got the definition.
dairyair said:
Or they are not male per your definition.
Click to expand...
They are male as to the actual definition of the word
dairyair said:
End of story.
Click to expand...
Again if you want to say the dictionary is wrong that's your prerogative but I'm going to go with common usage.
 
CLAX1911 said:
What does that mean how can you be 95% male? You produce 19/20ths of a sperm

Well you're referring to her as she so yes she does.

Maybe in the future don't shoot yourself in the foot by referring to someone as she if you're going to make the argument that they're not really a she.
Click to expand...
Now I see why this is so difficult.
You fail to understand science. Well that was known. You think sex/gender is binary. That says it all.
 
CLAX1911 said:
No. I posted a definition of the word male.

male
/māl/
adjective
Of, relating to, or designating the sex that has organs to produce spermatozoa for fertilizing ova.

If you had the organs that are associated with the production of sperm regardless of whether the sperm ever fertilizes an egg that means your mail.



Do they have a vagina or a penis and testicles? One would be the organs that produce sperm or that would be associated with the production of sperm and the other set of organs would not.

It doesn't matter if the sperm is infertile or if there's no sperm at all if you have the structures that would be associated with it that makes you male.

Your beef then is with the dictionary because that's where I got the definition.

They are male as to the actual definition of the word

Again if you want to say the dictionary is wrong that's your prerogative but I'm going to go with common usage.
Click to expand...
You posted no dictionary definition. You gave an opinion. Your opinion is wrong.
 
The
dairyair said:
Also not a true statement by you.
Here's a YY that could compete and then not compete. Due to testosterone and not genes only.
Binary thinking on humanity never works for all.

...


Who is Caster Semenya?​

Caster Semenya is a two-time Olympic champion and three-time world champion over 800m.

Between 2009 and 2019, the South African dominated her sport, with victory in the Doha Diamond League 800m in May 2019 being her 30th consecutive victory, external over the distance.
www.bbc.com

Caster Semenya Q&A: Who is she and why is her case important?

With Caster Semenya back in the news, BBC Sport looks at why her case is important.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com
Click to expand...
There is no YY chromosome
 
dairyair said:
You posted no dictionary definition. You gave an opinion. Your opinion is wrong.
Click to expand...
Definition 1a
www.merriam-webster.com

Definition of MALE

of, relating to, or being the sex that typically has the capacity to produce relatively small, usually motile gametes which fertilize the eggs of a female; having or producing only stamens or staminate flowers; having a gender identity that is the opposite of female… See the full definition
www.merriam-webster.com www.merriam-webster.com
 
CLAX1911 said:
This crap is why I avoid using the genetics.


There's another poster that does this crap.

I just use this.

male
/māl/
adjective
Of, relating to, or designating the sex that has organs to produce spermatozoa for fertilizing o
va.

female​

/fē′māl″/​

adjective​

  1. Of or denoting the sex that has the organs that could produces ova or bears young.

You can't say the one that produces sperm or eggs cuz they'll pull the same crap what about people who are infertile. If they have the structures that would normally produce further avail if they have the structures that would normally produce ova their female.

What you're fighting against with garbage posts like this is the univariant fallacy. These people will say essentially because there's no one trait that separates all men from all women there must therefore be a spectrum. Hey this is the address philosophy of person could come up with. And I make this point quite often in this discussion. There is no single trait that separates all cats from all monkeys but there isn't a monkey cat spectrum.
Click to expand...
That is not the only definition of male or female. You don't get to gatekeep definitions like that. There are also people who do not have either of those organs, produce any gametes. Some people do have both. While extremely rare, it can happen.

But we also aren't talking about sex here. We are talking mainly about gender and then people try to substitute sex for gender, which has different definitions.
 
CLAX1911 said:
What does that mean how can you be 95% male? You produce 19/20ths of a sperm

Well you're referring to her as she so yes she does.

Maybe in the future don't shoot yourself in the foot by referring to someone as she if you're going to make the argument that they're not really a she.
Click to expand...
I only posted what the story wrote and put in a link.
I never met the person.
 
roguenuke said:
That is not the only definition of male or female.
Click to expand...
I know but I'm establishing meaning you should do that when you start a discussion so people know what the hell you're talking about.

What I was doing was establishing what I mean by them when I say them in this context.

That's actually something you should do at the very beginning
roguenuke said:
You don't get to gatekeep definitions like that.
Click to expand...
I'm not gatekeeping definitions. What an incredibly ridiculous thing to say. I'm establishing semantics you have to do that for people to know what you're talking about when I say mail you know what I mean because the word has multiple meanings.
roguenuke said:
There are also people who do not have either of those organs, produce any gametes.
Click to expand...
You don't have to have the organs that produce the game to read the damn definition please. Organs are associated with it like you don't have to have ovaries if you still have a uterus because a person with the uterus doesn't produce sperm even if they had the organ that produced gametes
roguenuke said:
Some people do have both. While extremely rare, it can happen.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure that ever happened but it's irrelevant to the subject
roguenuke said:
But we also aren't talking about sex here. We are talking mainly about gender and then people try to substitute sex for gender, which has different definitions.
Click to expand...
Who is we? I was talking about sex not gender.
 
Desert Storm said:
😂

Click to expand...

I really think pride month became pride month because of commercial investment and it's a big opportunity to advertise. The last pride parade I went to was in 2015. It was one giant commercial for a whole bunch of brands and some local nightclubs.
 
CLAX1911 said:
I really think pride month became pride month because of commercial investment and it's a big opportunity to advertise. The last pride parade I went to was in 2015. It was one giant commercial for a whole bunch of brands and some local nightclubs.
Click to expand...
If I were ever to attend a Pride event, it would be to check out the hot Lesbians :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom