• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If you find gay/trans perverted, why?

noonereal said:
I call bullshit. Show the study and I will rip it to shreds.

Sounds like one of those studies where they set out to get a result.

The quoted only plays a roll.
Click to expand...
They accuse others of being in some sort of cult even as they swear up and down that women have cocks.

They are not the British bunch.
 
Crakhobarbie said:
Yes.
You are much better equipped to make that assessment than trained professionals.

As our dear friend @Mycroft says:
You are dismissed.
Click to expand...
My knowledge in the general field of human behavior and neuroscience would likely surprise you.
 
You wish to allow men who identify as women to beat up on women but not men who identify as men.

The discrimination of yours.




Your love of the actions taken by Hamas on Oct 6 have nothing to do with this thread.
 
I understand and very much appreciate that some people like women.
Personally, I am very attracted to women.
I'm glad that some people are attracted to men, too.
Love is all you need.
 
noonereal said:
Well, the exotic ones do.
Click to expand...
That provides them a different type of viewing material for when they are not viewing them beating up women.
 
noonereal said:
My knowledge in the general field of human behavior and neuroscience would likely surprise you.
Click to expand...
I understand.
Your vast knowledge on human behavior and neuroscience has led you to conclude being repulsed by homosexuality is inbred.

It's my contention that repulsion to homosexuality, also known as homophobia, is generally not considered a natural or inherent human trait. It is more likely a learned behavior or attitude influenced by social and cultural factors.

With your vast knowledge in the field, I'm surprised you are unaware of these facts.
 
Last edited:
This is how some people debate an issue:

Gardener said:
There ARE, however, vast legions of leftists too stupid to understand principles, and who operate strictly according to groupthink.
Click to expand...

Dans La Lune said:
Which principles don't we understand?
Click to expand...
We, as in we vast legions. Now here comes the true irony...............

Gardener said:
Ask me again when you achieve adult sentence and are capable of speaking as an individual.
Click to expand...
Yeesh, throwing out a personal insult for using the plural "we".

Gardener said:
He proved it by responding as "we".
Click to expand...
Well yeah, you were talking about a vast legion and Dans responded with "we."

First of all, throwing out personal insults and suggesting someone needs to achieve adult sentence (a sentence which, if you read it carefully, makes no sense in itself) while using poor sentence structure and not understanding how someone was replying in the plural since your attack was in the plural, is truly ironic - and idiotic.
 
Other studies have shown that the strong aversion has nothing to do with prejudice, ignorance, fear, and the influence of religious and political beliefs. Maybe they're just wired that way.
 
Taylor said:
Other studies have shown that the strong aversion has nothing to do with prejudice, ignorance, fear, and the influence of religious and political beliefs. Maybe they're just wired that way.
Click to expand...
I would love to see you post such studies. Seriously. The aversions you are talking to are towards sexual or physical acts. But NOT towards individuals we associate with those sexual or physical acts.
It's like when there were, and still are in some places, an aversion to seeing a black man kissing a white woman. Those that have the aversion don't see the individual, they see ONLY the kissing.
If you have an aversion, it is an aversion to the homosexual demonstration of love, or sex. And you interpret that as an aversion of the person. Yet, if you didn't know the person was homosexual, would you still feel an aversion towards them?
 


It's funny because as someone who only likes women, men kissing men doesn't repulse me at all. Like, one of my best dude friends has a boyfriend, and when they give each other pecks I think it's sweet.

 
Thank you for pointing out the dropped letter in sentience.

Those on the current trans bandwagon who do not understand that they DID NOT believe that women have cocks 15 years ago lack sentience by very definitionm
 
I chock it up to men who get boners when they poop. It's a thing, look it up.
 
Gardener said:
For starters, I do not conflate the two.

There is nothing perverted about either.


There ARE, however, vast legions of leftists too stupid to understand principles, and who operate strictly according to groupthink.
Click to expand...
Oh, the principles of punching down on people that don't affect your life in any way.

I see.
 
SNOWFLAKE said:
I would love to see you post such studies. Seriously. The aversions you are talking to are towards sexual or physical acts. But NOT towards individuals we associate with those sexual or physical acts.
Click to expand...
I never said otherwise. I was responding to posts that mentioned reactions to "public displays of affection between two men." Pretty specific.
 
Hamish Howl said:
Oh, the principles of punching down on people that don't affect your life in any way.

I see.
Click to expand...
No, I DON'T punch down on women like you misogynists who want to see them hurt.
 
Hamish Howl said:
Gay people do that? Trans people do that?
Click to expand...
You certainly are an illogical fellow, aren't you?

When did you first find yourself hating women and despising liberalism?
 
Aries said:
I chock it up to men who get boners when they poop. It's a thing, look it up.
Click to expand...
If you think they get boners, then, you should see them when chicks with dicks are beating on women.
 
I could see this being a poll with a few options, mainly to enhance the ready moments.
 
noonereal said:
If you watch a ballet, figure skating, ballroom dancing the eyes of the audience is always on the women. Both men and women watch the women as the main focus of concentration.
Click to expand...

As if ballet dancers Nureyev, Baryshnikov, Acosta, Cornejo, Corella, etc never existed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.