If you cannot answer yes to these two questions, then you should not vote for Trump

[rjay]

Question 1:
Would you be willing to have a loved one, who is female, attractive and in her twenties, spend the night in the same house as Donald, if they were the only two there?

Question 2:
Would you be willing to give Donald complete access and control of your investments for two days?


1. You would have to fear that the female is in danger of being groped and assaulted.
2. You would have to fear that at the end of two days you would have nothing and Trump would have more money.

You would have neither of these fears with Biden, Obama, Romney, McCain or Harris.

We don't need, and should not want, people who have no personal integrity, leading the Country

 

[Anthony60]

Question 1:
Would you be willing to have a loved one, who is female, attractive and in her twenties, spend the night in the same house as Donald, if they were the only two there?

Question 2:
Would you be willing to give Donald complete access and control of your investments for two days?


1. You would have to fear that the female is in danger of being groped and assaulted.
2. You would have to fear that at the end of two days you would have nothing and Trump would have more money.

You would have neither of these fears with Biden, Obama, Romney, McCain or Harris.

We don't need, and should not want, people who have no personal integrity, leading the Country

LOL! And this is how you decide who to vote for? I would not want any of those Democrats involved at all, for sure.

 

[SNOWFLAKE]

LOL! And this is how you decide who to vote for? I would not want any of those Democrats involved at all, for sure.

Didn't take long to find out who won't answer the questions as posed. It's not that hard. Unless of course, the person NOT answering has a guilty conscience.

 

[X Factor]

Question 1:
Would you be willing to have a loved one, who is female, attractive and in her twenties, spend the night in the same house as Donald, if they were the only two there?

Question 2:
Would you be willing to give Donald complete access and control of your investments for two days?


1. You would have to fear that the female is in danger of being groped and assaulted.
2. You would have to fear that at the end of two days you would have nothing and Trump would have more money.

You would have neither of these fears with Biden, Obama, Romney, McCain or Harris.

We don't need, and should not want, people who have no personal integrity, leading the Country

I notice you left Bill Clinton out. Lol.

 

[SNOWFLAKE]

1. NO FRIGGIN' WAY - and my answer is not based on TDS or "hatred" of Trump. I would NOT trust my daughter, niece, or any young lady I care about to be in the company of such a loathsome human being regardless if his name is Trump or someone else.
However, I suspect, few on here will actually answer the question either honestly or at all.

2. NO - it's simple folks, trust your money to a know swindler (regardless of his name is Trump or someone else) and you only have to look in the mirror to see a fool.
However, I suspect, few on here will actually answer the question either honestly or at all.

 

[SNOWFLAKE]

I notice you left Bill Clinton out. Lol.

Evasion number 2.

How can it be THIS hard to simply answer questions as they are posed?

However, I will give you this: The OP shouldn't have tainted his questions in this fashion:

1. You would have to fear that the female is in danger of being groped and assaulted.
2. You would have to fear that at the end of two days you would have nothing and Trump would have more money.

And should have just stuck to the first two questions. SO, let us try again, without the commentary, to ask you................

Question 1:
Would you be willing to have a loved one, who is female, attractive and in her twenties, spend the night in the same house as Donald, if they were the only two there?

Question 2:
Would you be willing to give Donald complete access and control of your investments for two days?

 

[rjay]

I notice you left Bill Clinton out. Lol.

I woudn't have a problem adding Clinton, both Bushes, Reagan, Ford, or Carter to the list.

Clinton dveloped a reputation for womanizing, true. He did develop relationships with women while married. He did not assault women, or do anything non-consensual.

I don't know about you, but the consensual thing is kind of a big deal to me.

 

[rjay]

Evasion number 2.

How can it be THIS hard to simply answer questions as they are posed?

However, I will give you this: The OP shouldn't have tainted his questions in this fashion:

And should have just stuck to the first two questions. SO, let us try again, without the commentary, to ask you................

You may be right. Perhaps I did not need to express the fears I would have. At least not in the OP. There would surely be opportunity to do so later in the thread

 

[Flaming Capitalist]

Question 1:
Would you be willing to have a loved one, who is female, attractive and in her twenties, spend the night in the same house as Donald, if they were the only two there?

Question 2:
Would you be willing to give Donald complete access and control of your investments for two days?


1. You would have to fear that the female is in danger of being groped and assaulted.
2. You would have to fear that at the end of two days you would have nothing and Trump would have more money.

You would have neither of these fears with Biden, Obama, Romney, McCain or Harris.

We don't need, and should not want, people who have no personal integrity, leading the Country

This is why I will never vote for Trump:

 

[rational anarchist]

Question 1:
Would you be willing to have a loved one, who is female, attractive and in her twenties, spend the night in the same house as Donald, if they were the only two there?

Question 2:
Would you be willing to give Donald complete access and control of your investments for two days?


1. You would have to fear that the female is in danger of being groped and assaulted.
2. You would have to fear that at the end of two days you would have nothing and Trump would have more money.

You would have neither of these fears with Biden, Obama, Romney, McCain or Harris.

We don't need, and should not want, people who have no personal integrity, leading the Country

I think it hilarious when democrats tell repubes who and why they should vote for,,

BREAKING: Kamala reversing AGAIN on fracking to please the climate change voters – The Right Scoop

therightscoop.com

 

[rational anarchist]

Question 1:
Would you be willing to have a loved one, who is female, attractive and in her twenties, spend the night in the same house as Donald, if they were the only two there?

Question 2:
Would you be willing to give Donald complete access and control of your investments for two days?


1. You would have to fear that the female is in danger of being groped and assaulted.
2. You would have to fear that at the end of two days you would have nothing and Trump would have more money.

You would have neither of these fears with Biden, Obama, Romney, McCain or Harris.

We don't need, and should not want, people who have no personal integrity, leading the Country

 

[Mycroft]

I woudn't have a problem adding Clinton, both Bushes, Reagan, Ford, or Carter to the list.

Clinton dveloped a reputation for womanizing, true. He did develop relationships with women while married. He did not assault women, or do anything non-consensual.

I don't know about you, but the consensual thing is kind of a big deal to me.

You don't know much about Bill Clinton, do you?

Not only did he assault women, but his wife was his enabler.

Which Woman Accused Bill Clinton of Sexual Misconduct/Assault? | Law & Crime

After The New York Times published a article on Sunday about Trump’s history with women, some political commentators suggested it would give Trump the opening he needed to go after the 42nd president.

lawandcrime.com

 

[rjay]

You raise a point. I had forgotten about the Epstein angle

I would be willing to exclude voting for either Trump or Clinton based on Question 1, just for their affiliation, and many flights, on the Epstein planes.

We don't know if either of them engaged in any physical touching of girls associated with Epstein. If they did, that would automatically fall in the non-consensual touching category, in my book.

 

[rational anarchist]

You raise a point. I had forgotten about the Epstein angle

I would be willing to exclude voting for either Trump or Clinton based on Question 1, just for their affiliation, and many flights, on the Epstein planes.

We don't know if either of them engaged in any physical touching of girls associated with Epstein. If they did, that would automatically fall in the non-consensual touching category, in my book.

except when trump found out about epstein he banned him from his resorts and stopped hanging around him and clinton kept visiting the island,,

and trump says he will release the client list and dems have worked night and day concealing it,,

 

[rjay]

except when trump found out about epstein he banned him from his resorts and stopped hanging around him and clinton kept visiting the island,,

and trump says he will release the client list and dems have worked night and day concealing it,,

Ok, you made your point about Clinton. I think I even conceded your point. (I hope I didn't break any rules here by doing that )

Now are you going to answer the two questions? I realize that whatever your answer is, it will have no bearing on how you will vote. So don't be afraid to be honest with yourself.

 

[rational anarchist]

Ok, you made your point about Clinton. I think I even conceded your point. (I hope I didn't break any rules here by doing that )

Now are you going to answer the two questions? I realize that whatever your answer is, it will have no bearing on how you will vote. So don't be afraid to be honest with yourself.

to be honest with both of us I am voting for trump mostly because of democrats,,

I didnt vote for him in 16 or 20,,

but the dems have gone so radical I have no other choice,,

and the answer to both your questions is yes I would,,

 

[rjay]

to be honest with both of us I am voting for trump mostly because of democrats,,

I didnt vote for him in 16 or 20,,

but the dems have gone so radical I have no other choice,,

and the answer to both your questions is yes I would,,

You answered Yes to both questions, fair enough. I love your 'throw caution to the wind' attitude.

 

[rational anarchist]

You answered Yes to both questions, fair enough. I love your 'throw caution to the wind' attitude.

of course you dont know me very well,,

those that do know me know to not cross me because laws mean nothing when you do,,

 

[rjay]

of course you dont know me very well,,

those that do know me know to not cross me because laws mean nothing when you do,,

This might be a good time to take a deep breath and relax. I thought our conversation, up until now, was quite cordial.

I did not mean, nor was I trying, to make you angry. I will keep this in mind for any future exchanges we may have. I will try to be even more gentle with you from now on.

I will give you this, I think you may be the only one to actually address the questions. Bravo for that.

 

[rational anarchist]

This might be a good time to take a deep breath and relax. I thought our conversation, up until now, was quite cordial.

I did not mean, nor was I trying, to make you angry. I will keep this in mind for any future exchanges we may have. I will try to be even more gentle with you.

what makes you think I am angry??

I just explained to you how I work,,

maybe you shouldnt speak about things you dont know about,,
or at least not get triggered like this when you get corrected,,

 

[rjay]

what makes you think I am angry??

I just explained to you how I work,,

maybe you shouldnt speak about things you dont know about,,
or at least not get triggered like this when you get corrected,,

Maybe your not angry, how would I know. I can only go by the thoughts you express.
I am not the least bit triggered.

maybe my original thought was correct and it has been a cordial exchange.

Till next time,
Cheers bud.

 

[rational anarchist]

 

[Anthony60]

Didn't take long to find out who won't answer the questions as posed. It's not that hard. Unless of course, the person NOT answering has a guilty conscience.

It's a stupid question. A really, really stupid question.

 

[Utility Man]

except when trump found out about epstein he banned him from his resorts and stopped hanging around him and clinton kept visiting the island,,

and trump says he will release the client list and dems have worked night and day concealing it,,

 

[rational anarchist]

well she is about the only person that knows all the people on the epstien client list since her boss was murdered,,

she needs all the well wishs she can get,,

do you have any idea why we never hear anyone on the left talking about this topic or sex slavery at the southern border??