If Trump Were in the Epstein Files and Engaged in Criminal Acts, Would You Support Impeachment?

[Fletch]

If that was in the Epstein files the Trump administration would have already destroyed that evidence. As to impeachment, I would already support that on existing grounds.

No, if that were in the Epstein files, Biden would have released it. Or prosecuted. Trumps not going anywhere. Sorry.

 

[NolanVoyd]

ELon is a petulant child.

So is Trump.

 

[Jason Warfield]

Yes, but We should go by worst offenders first , then by Alphabetical order!
So Trumnp would have time to help America as his is doing now, and get all the others jailed first.
Like The Clinton's , Gates,

• David Copperfield,
• John Connelly,
• Alan Dershowitz,
• Leonardo DiCapri
• Al Gore,
• Marvin Minksy,
• Kevin Spacey,
• George Lucas,
• Noam Chomsk

Everyone on your list can be handled before, during or after an impeachment and removal process for Trump. So, there is no need to wait to go after the worst ones first as other courts would handle that and not Congress.

So, your list has no bearing on the scheduling of impeachment and removal proceedings for Trump if were to, hypothetically, have evidence against him for sexual assault of minors.

Further, why should we wait? Why would you want to wait to get rid of a president where (in this case, hypothetically) there is evidence of the president sexually assaulting children? The Constitution has a chain of command if the president is removed from office. So, that's no reason to wait.

Sorry, that dog don't hunt.

 

[Jason Warfield]

No, if that were in the Epstein files, Biden would have released it. Or prosecuted. Trumps not going anywhere. Sorry.

Much like all that evidence about the Biden crime family.....

 

[JoeB131]

No. That he was guilty of the things he was impeached for?

Not really.

He denied having sex with Lewinsky. Not to be too delicate here, but a lot of men don't consider oral gratification as sex. So technically, he's wasn't lying.

That said, yes, Clinton fully earned the nickname "Slick Willy", where he mastered not giving a straight answer to a straightforward question, a trait common to politicians and lawyers.

 

[Dans La Lune]

And by criminal acts, I mean had sex with a minor.

Trump is guilty, and they either know it and accept it as part of the package, or have drunk so many glasses of Kool-aid that they cannot see straight. Trump was deeeeep in Epstein territory.

 

[Gatsby]

Yes, but We should go by worst offenders first , then by Alphabetical order!

What other crimes do you think should not be prosecuted if the person's last name starts with a letter toward the end of the alphabet? Do you vote based upon this strange theory of law enforcement?

So Trumnp would have time to help America as his is doing now, and get all the others jailed first.

So your answer is that even if you knew for a fact that Trump diddled children, you would want him to continue being president. OK. Folks, we have at least one person willing to say that on the record.

Like The Clinton's , Gates,

• David Copperfield,
• John Connelly,
• Alan Dershowitz,
• Leonardo DiCapri
• Al Gore,
• Marvin Minksy,
• Kevin Spacey,
• George Lucas,
• Noam Chomsk

Marvin Minsky has been dead for nearly a decade.

 

[Fearandloathing]

If that was in the Epstein files the Trump administration would have already destroyed that evidence. As to impeachment, I would already support that on existing grounds.

I have nothing to add to that other than anyone who thinks Donald Trump will ever face true justice is dreaming in technicolor

 

[Fletch]

Much like all that evidence about the Biden crime family.....

I guess that is just your way of agreeing that there is no evidence of a Trump Epstein link. Ok, next time just hit 'like'

 

[W_Heisenberg]

No, if that were in the Epstein files, Biden would have released it. Or prosecuted. Trumps not going anywhere. Sorry.

So strange. You appear to find this thread interested but refuse to vote in the poll.

 

[Fletch]

I have nothing to add to that other than anyone who thinks Donald Trump will ever face true justice is dreaming in technicolor

Well, apparently there are a lot of people linked to Epstein that wont face any repercussions at all. Not sure how its possible that Epstein ran a child exploitation ring for years and not a single person has been charged with anything. The fall guy for all of this seems to be poor Price Andrew. And even he hasnt been charged with a crime. There is a cover up going on here and lots of big names are being shielded.

 

[JoeyJoystick]

Trump is guilty.

Hi Luna,

It wouldn't surprise me for a sec, but what makes you so assertive regarding this?


Joey

 

[JoeyJoystick]

Well, apparently there are a lot of people linked to Epstein that wont face any repercussions at all. Not sure how its possible that Epstein ran a child exploitation ring for years and not a single person has been charged with anything. The fall guy for all of this seems to be poor Price Andrew. And even he hasnt been charged with a crime. There is a cover up going on here and lots of big names are being shielded.

Hey Fletch,

You're being quite assertive on this, yet you also say 'apparently'... You're indicating that you know that it is not all that clear cut yet.

Many years ago there was a infamous case in Belgium. Many conspiracies surrounding that case as well. But now, after all these years, there still is zero evidence that any of the rumours were actually true.

The thing is; Is it possible that many more men are involved? Yes. But do we know who and in what capacity? No. What makes me weary is that people are very very bad at keeping things secret. And this case, as well as the Belgium case I mentioned earlier, is so big and high profile, that people are bound to start talking. I am not going to try to defend anyone here. But making these accusations can be dangerous. I do think they should publish the files though.

And one more things; I hope you were being sarcastic, but there is not such thing as 'poor Prince Andrew'.


Joey

 

[Captain Adverse]

Yeah, Trump doesn't even know Epstein!

View attachment 67573154

Lots of important people "knew Epstein."

That does not mean they all either knew of his criminal activities or participated in them. While flight logs show Trump traveled on Epstein's private jet four times (1993, 94, 95, and 97) three of the flights were all between NYC and Florida, and one in 1994 was from Florida to Washington D.C. https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-flights-jeffrey-epstein-jet-lolita-express-1857109

The record also shows that Trump banned Epstein from Maralago back in 2004.

Once again, the Democrat's had control of the Epstein files. If there was any evidence Trump had been to the "Island" where the bulk of illegal activities occurred the Democrats would have published it over and over to prevent Trump's elections.

 

[What if...?]

Well, let's see what they say. I find it difficult to imagine they wouldn't want Trump impeached if they found out he abused children.

I think their heads would explode trying to justify it.

Hell, I’m quite sure that if trump demanded all the tall blonde teenage girls be brought to him for his pleasure many would not only do it, they would pay for their Brazilians.

 

[What if...?]

Hey Fletch,

You're being quite assertive on this, yet you also say 'apparently'... You're indicating that you know that it is not all that clear cut yet.

Many years ago there was a infamous case in Belgium. Many conspiracies surrounding that case as well. But now, after all these years, there still is zero evidence that any of the rumours were actually true.

The thing is; Is it possible that many more men are involved? Yes. But do we know who and in what capacity? No. What makes me weary is that people are very very bad at keeping things secret. And this case, as well as the Belgium case I mentioned earlier, is so big and high profile, that people are bound to start talking. I am not going to try to defend anyone here. But making these accusations can be dangerous. I do think they should publish the files though.

And one more things; I hope you were being sarcastic, but there is not such thing as 'poor Prince Andrew'.


Joey

We have seen lists of people who went. One claimed he only got a massage.

But every single one who went knew what was going on. That’s why the list is kept secret.

I think the real reason there have been no arrests is our two tier legal system and jurisdiction.

 

[What if...?]

Lots of important people "knew Epstein."

That does not mean they all either knew of his criminal activities or participated in them. While flight logs show Trump traveled on Epstein's private jet four times (1993, 94, 95, and 97) three of the flights were all between NYC and Florida, and one in 1994 was from Florida to Washington D.C. https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-flights-jeffrey-epstein-jet-lolita-express-1857109

The record also shows that Trump banned Epstein from Maralago back in 2004.

Once again, the Democrat's had control of the Epstein files. If there was any evidence Trump had been to the "Island" where the bulk of illegal activities occurred the Democrats would have published it over and over to prevent Trump's elections.

That list is a bomb. The wealthy and powerful just know any revelation would lead to mutually assured destruction.

 

[Jagged]

Impeachment should only be for violations of public trust or crimes committed in office.

 

[Ethel2]

Do you have any link that proves that Trump was ever at Epstein's island?

Nope
But IF there was solid proof that he engaged in sexual activity with a minor would you then support impeaching him?
YES OR NO
Remember: he can’t be tried in court until he’s impeached and convicted.

 

[Ethel2]

Impeachment should only be for violations of public trust or crimes committed in office.

I think the public has a right to trust someone to keep it in their pants when they are interacting with a minor.
Don’t you?

 

[Jagged]

I think the public has a right to trust someone to keep it in their pants when they are interacting with a minor.
Don’t you?

Again, I believe impeachment should be about issues arising while they're president. As it is, Trump is already a convicted felon, but America elected him president anyway. He was indicted for mishandling classified material and for trying to steal the election he lost, but America elected him anyway. Past crimes do not appear to be a reason to ban someone from the presidency.

 

[bomberfox]

No

If he did, it would have been reprehensible.

But almost certainly outside the statue of limitations and has nothing to do with his official duties as president.

Liberals can't argue that impeaching Clinton over sexual misconduct was wrong (even though Clinton was in office during the misconduct) but impeaching Trump for something that might have happened 20 years ago is okay.

Impeach away.

 

[bomberfox]

Theres absolutely nothing a president will ever be impeached or criminally charged for. We have a monarch. Nobody will hold him accountable but you. Get to organizing and strike.

 

[LouC]

If Trump Were in the Epstein Files and Engaged in Criminal Acts, Would You Support Impeachment?​

No.

Not unless Rep's Comer and Jordan brought forth Articles of Impeachment against KING MAGAT aka Donald Trump before the House for a vote.

 

[----------]

Liberals have come completely unhinged. All they have left is their hate for President Trump and America.