• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If Trump Were in the Epstein Files and Engaged in Criminal Acts, Would You Support Impeachment?

If Trump Were in the Epstein Files and Engaged in Criminal Acts, Would You Support Impeachment?

  • Total voters
    57
stealthycat said:
I 100% support ousting every elected official that's done wrong to kids and prosecute to the fullest extent of the laws

If Trump were in the files, Democrats would have released them (high Democrats are in the files and it wasn't worth it)
Click to expand...
I think all presidential candidates should be required to pass the same background checks used to obtain a security clearance. That would probably leave very few candidates to choose from.

I also voted yes to this poll for similar reasons (as well as obvious moral reasons), but I don't expect any evidence to surface.
 
The Trump DoJ under AG Pam Bondi and the FBI under Kash Patel have the Epstein trial documents (heavily redacted) in their possession.

Epstein is deceased. Why don't they simply release the unredacted Epstein files? Who are they protecting? Donald Trump?
 
Xilnik said:
I think all presidential candidates should be required to pass the same background checks used to obtain a security clearance. That would probably leave very few candidates to choose from.
I also voted yes to this poll for similar reasons (as well as obvious moral reasons), but I don't expect any evidence to surface.
Click to expand...

I'd vote for that

and age limit of 65 years old too - we don't need leaders who for the first 50 years of their lives didn't know what a computer or cell phone was
 
JoeB131 said:
No

If he did, it would have been reprehensible.

But almost certainly outside the statue of limitations and has nothing to do with his official duties as president.

Liberals can't argue that impeaching Clinton over sexual misconduct was wrong (even though Clinton was in office during the misconduct) but impeaching Trump for something that might have happened 20 years ago is okay.
Click to expand...

Seems to me there is a big, moral difference between an adult man having sex with a minor, most likely a young teen, who was also sexually trafficked as compared to an adult woman who engaged in consensual sexual activity (by her own account), with an adult man.

Also, with respect to the whataboutism, it goes both ways. Conservatives can't argue that impeaching Clinton over sexual misconduct was the proper course of action, but not impeaching Trump for doing something far worse should be dismissed.
 
Rogue Valley said:
The Trump DoJ under AG Pam Bondi and the FBI under Kash Patel have the Epstein trial documents (heavily redacted) in their possession.

Epstein is deceased. Why don't they simply release the unredacted Epstein files? Who are they protecting? Donald Trump?
Click to expand...

I think that is quite plausible. I'm curious what Elon Musk discovered. He obviously had access to a lot of information, and still does.
 
americanwoman said:
Yeah, Trump doesn't even know Epstein!

View attachment 67573154
Click to expand...
Trump banned Epstein from Mara Logo after he found out that Epstein was a paedophile.
The Democrat politicians and celebrities kept taking rides on his plane even after they knew that he had been convicted of trafficking minors.
The premise of this thread is full of holes.
 
Noodlegawd said:
Didn't the Biden administration have access to the "Epstein files"?
Click to expand...
I have no doubt some Dems and other prominent people are on that list.
 
Bodecea said:
I have no doubt some Dems and other prominent people are on that list.
Click to expand...

Sure, but that wasn't my point. Biden had the list the entire time he was president. Dems played every card in their deck to get Trump in prison before the election. If there was anything there, they would have played this one in a heartbeat.
 
Epstein's criminal defense attorney, David Schoen put an end to the rumors and the Musk allegation last night. Sorry to ruin the Trump haters' fun but Trump is not a pedophile.

As not to be accused of spamming the forum with a tweet, you may view David Schoen's statement here: Post #320
 
trixare4kids said:
Epstein's criminal defense attorney, David Schoen put an end to the rumors and the Musk allegation last night. Sorry to ruin the Trump haters' fun but Trump is not a pedophile.

As not to be accused of spamming the forum with a tweet, you may view David Schoen's statement here: Post #320
Click to expand...

The evidence is : Trust me bro.

🤣
 
Hatuey said:
The evidence is : Trust me bro.

🤣
Click to expand...

Indeed

Schoen is also Trump’s personal attorney, he represented Trump during the impeachment.

Schoen apparently had just met Epstein a few days before he died.

Odd coincidence, eh?

Also, apparently Schoen represented Roger Stone and Bannon as well.
 
Emlee said:
Indeed

Schoen is also Trump’s personal attorney, he represented Trump during the impeachment.

Schoen apparently had just met Epstein a few days before he died.

Odd coincidence, eh?

Also, apparently Schoen represented Roger Stone and Bannon as well.
Click to expand...

Oh I definitely trust him now! A guy like that would never lie! Not on Twitter!

😂
 
W_Heisenberg said:
And by criminal acts, I mean had sex with a minor.
Click to expand...
It wouldn't surprise me at all. I support impeachment with or without Epstein tapes involvement or hard core evidence of pedophilia.

He has many other violations to warrant an impeachment, he should not have made it to office a second time. A successful impeachment would best for our country, our government, our citizens, our environment, our health, our health care and our allies. Basically best for the future of America.
 
W_Heisenberg said:
Seems to me there is a big, moral difference between an adult man having sex with a minor, most likely a young teen, who was also sexually trafficked as compared to an adult woman who engaged in consensual sexual activity (by her own account), with an adult man.

Also, with respect to the whataboutism, it goes both ways. Conservatives can't argue that impeaching Clinton over sexual misconduct was the proper course of action, but not impeaching Trump for doing something far worse should be dismissed.
Click to expand...

I agree that the GOP were hypocrites impeaching Clinton, especially with how many of them had mistresses on the side. (Gingrich, Livingston, Henry Hyde, etc.)

That said, we see a bunch of innuendos against a lot of people, and no real evidence against anyone.
 
No. We don’t impeach Presidents for things they did prior to their Presidency. Otherwise it would be part of the inauguration ceremony.
 
JoeB131 said:
I agree that the GOP were hypocrites impeaching Clinton, especially with how many of them had mistresses on the side. (Gingrich, Livingston, Henry Hyde, etc.)

That said, we see a bunch of innuendos against a lot of people, and no real evidence against anyone.
Click to expand...
Clinton was factually guilty of the impeachment charges brought against him
 
Real blank said:
Clinton was factually guilty of the impeachment charges brought against him
Click to expand...

That no reasonable person thought he ever should have been charged with.

He lied about a personal matter he found embarrassing.

That was it.

During a lawsuit that was dismissed multiple times for having no legal merit.
 
JoeB131 said:
That no reasonable person thought he ever should have been charged with.

He lied about a personal matter he found embarrassing.

That was it.

During a lawsuit that was dismissed multiple times for having no legal merit.
Click to expand...
so you agree
 
Real blank said:
so you agree
Click to expand...
That what Clinton was impeached for was bull-droppings? Absolutely.

Especially since the people accusing him (Gingrich, Hyde, LIvingstone) engaged in the same behavior.
 
JoeB131 said:
That what Clinton was impeached for was bull-droppings? Absolutely.

Especially since the people accusing him (Gingrich, Hyde, LIvingstone) engaged in the same behavior.
Click to expand...
No. That he was guilty of the things he was impeached for?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom