• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If there is an aggression and you stay neutral - are you really neutral then?

If there is an aggression and you stay neutral - are you really neutral then?

  • no - you are not - because you help the aggressor by doing nothing

    Votes: 11 64.7%
  • yes - you can stay neutral in the face of aggression

    Votes: 6 35.3%

  • Total voters
    17
Switzerland was not a fascist country during WWII
Did anybody say so?
And btw: The Ukraine of today is NOT a fascist country - whatever Putin may say.
 
I won't trust them at all. And historically soldiers have fought harder when they new the only standing between their wives, sons, daughters, parents and certain death, destruction, disabilities on them. The folks who went and dropped off their loved ones are the least reliable. What incentive is there for them to fight to death? They have everything to live for now that their families are out of danger.

Do you have any historical examples of this, Juin? Because I see history replete with examples of people who fought effectively and valiantly without putting their loved ones in harm's way. Or fighting to the death, for that matter.
 
Last edited:
Did anybody say so?
And btw: The Ukraine of today is NOT a fascist country - whatever Putin may say.
People were saying that you may as well be the oppressor if you stay neutral
 
Back
Top Bottom