I have been saying for the last 4 years that if it were a corporation that Bush were president of, he would have been out on his keester long ago. So it does not surprise me in the least that some corporate executives are saying the same thing.
Article is here.
And I gues your boy "Slick Willie" would not have gotten fired huh?
In 2004 the American People had the chance to fire him. They did not.I have been saying for the last 4 years that if it were a corporation that Bush were president of, he would have been out on his keester long ago. So it does not surprise me in the least that some corporate executives are saying the same thing.
Article is here.
And I gues your boy "Slick Willie" would not have gotten fired huh?
silly, jealous opinionated rhetoric.
:2wave:
This thread is nothing but silly, jealous opinionated rhetoric. Why is this horses**t in a debate forum?
:2wave:
The jobs are incomparable.
they also have ethics clauses in their contracts among other clausesProbably not. Clinton took over the company when it was having massive debt problems, and under his leadership put the company in the black for the first time in decades, ran the company profitably, and increased its work force dramatically. Having an affair usually doesn't cause the downfall of otherwise very successful CEOs.
Stay on topic! This is not about Clinton nor is it about how much you hate Gays...what's your comment specific to this thread?And I gues your boy "Slick Willie" would not have gotten fired huh?
That's because he used FEAR tactics to hold onto his job!In 2004 the American People had the chance to fire him. They did not.
So...?
Excellent contribution! What do you actually think about the article presented and it's premise or were you more interested in trying to ruin this thread than contribute to it? I'm betting on the latter.This thread is nothing but silly, jealous opinionated rhetoric. Why is this horses**t in a debate forum?
:2wave:
As if there would have been tens of millions of dollars spent measuring the curve of his penis or delving into his personal life!they also have ethics clauses in their contracts among other clauses
which would have resulted in him being fired for lying under oath, well actually for being Caught lying under oath
You complimented me on the post where I said what I thought of the article. Guess you missed it. Here it is again: "nothing but silly, jealous opinionated rhetoric"What do you actually think about the article presented
"nothing but silly, jealous opinionated rhetoric"
I would have replied to post #9, had post #9 been relevant to this discussion. There are many - probably hundreds - of threads which deal with the President's performance. Pick one. This thread, which was born out of one American's opinion, has more to do with his hate and little to do with anything worth debating. That is why I say, again: nothing but silly, jealous opinionated rhetoricSee post #9
I would have replied to post #9, had post #9 been relevant to this discussion. There are many - probably hundreds - of threads which deal with the President's performance. Pick one. This thread, which was born out of one American's opinion, has more to do with his hate and little to do with anything worth debating. That is why I say, again: nothing but silly, jealous opinionated rhetoric
No one has been flame-baited, dana, so get over yourself. Relax.Jealous opinionated rhetoric against Bush from a mover and shaker of the investment class? Give it a rest. Flame baiting from you does not change the fact that what you call jealousy is coming from some of the very same people who voted for Bush. :rofl
If Bush were a programmer, his code would be plagued with null pointers and infinite loops. :2razz:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?