- Joined
- Dec 12, 2019
- Messages
- 30,488
- Reaction score
- 8,841
- Location
- Flaw-i-duh
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
It appears to me, you are the one lied to, and you believe it.
Have you seen a cost benefit analysis on the projects we do? Wouldn't tax dollars be better spent in other areas?
Once again, automatic denial..."Tony Heller video". *L*
Once again, automatic denial...
Yes, I know who he is. He has some pretty good credentials, unlike your James Cook.Not really. I looked up his credentials. Guess what they are??????
Yes, I know who he is. He has some pretty good credentials, unlike your James Cook.
Close enough:Climates science research papers?
We used socialist solutions to deal with smog and they seemed to work. Ditto auto safety. Speed limits are obvious socialism as well.Then why is every climate change "solution" proposed by the left some sort of economic program or tax?
Close enough:
He has several papers related to electronics.
LOL. In submission in 2003.``Discovering Associations Between Climatic and Oceanic Parameters to Monitor Drought Using Data Mining Techniques in Nebraska,'' Tsegaye Tadesse, Donald A. Wilhite, Michael J. Hayes, Sherri K. Harms, and Steve Goddard, in submission to Journal of Climate, 2003.
``A Self-Calibrating Palmer Drought Severity Index,'' Nathan Wells, Steve Goddard, and Michael J. Hayes, in submission to Journal of Climate, 2003.
``Drought Monitoring Using Data Mining Techniques,'' Tsegaye Tadesse, Donald A. Wilhite, Sherri K. Harms, Michael J. Hayes, and Steve Goddard, Natural Hazards, accepted with revisions for publication in 2004.
``Patterns and Trends of Soil Climate Regimes and Drought Events in the Northern Great Plains,'' W.J. Waltman, S. Goddard, S.E. Reichenbach, M.D. Svoboda, M.J. Hayes, and J.S. Peake, Proceedings of the Applied Geography Conference, Colorado Springs, Colorado, November 2003.
LOL. In submission in 2003.
That’s code for ‘rejected’.
The other looks like an abstract to a local conference, and a paper from an obscure journal 15+ years ago thats not even about climate.
Cook, of course, has several well cited papers and authors two college level textbooks on the subject.
For a guy who hates pundits and bloggers, you sure like pundits and bloggers.
The NOAA Climate Extremes Index
Unbailable how NOAA tamper with the data. What the media is reporting is the opposite of what really has happened. The decade of the 1930s was much hotter than the decade of 2010s. During the summers of 1930s high temperatures and drought plagued much of the U.S. Before global warming there was the dust bowl years of the 1930s. During the summer of 1936 more than 5,000 people died due to the heat wave across the U.S.The NOAA Climate Extremes Index | Real Climate Science
Posted on July 31, 2021 by tonyheller
According to NOAA, the area of the US experiencing extreme maximum summer temperatures has greatly increased over the past fifty years.
“The sum of (a) percentage of the United States with maximum temperatures much below normal and (b) percentage of the United States with maximum temperatures much above normal.”
U.S. Climate Extremes Index (CEI) | Extremes | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
According to NOAA, the past decade has been the hottest on record.
Click link above for full article.
I think most of the actual Scientist are accurately reporting their findings,Unbailable how NOAA tamper with the data. What the media is reporting is the opposite of what really has happened. The decade of the 1930s was much hotter than the decade of 2010s. During the summers of 1930s high temperatures and drought plagued much of the U.S. Before global warming there was the dust bowl years of the 1930s. During the summer of 1936 more than 5,000 people died due to the heat wave across the U.S.
In this context, saying a reading is 0.01°C higher that some earlier reading, is almost meaningless, because the error bar is ±0.1°C.Q. How accurate are the GISS results (tables, graphs)?
A. The GISS results are estimates based on the available data. Hence it is important to determine the uncertainty of these results. A new uncertainty web site has been created and a paper published that deals with that problem. Roughly speaking, the uncertainty of annual global means after 1960 is about ±0.05°C, for seasonal and monthly means that number increases to ±0.1°C and ±0.17°C, respectively.
Unbailable how NOAA tamper with the data. What the media is reporting is the opposite of what really has happened. The decade of the 1930s was much hotter than the decade of 2010s. During the summers of 1930s high temperatures and drought plagued much of the U.S. Before global warming there was the dust bowl years of the 1930s. During the summer of 1936 more than 5,000 people died due to the heat wave across the U.S.
You say that like the idea that Human added CO2 may be causing some of the recent warming is a big deal.What caused the high temperarures of the 1930s? What is causing them now?
Wrong . Its entirely political being given faux scientific window dressing in an attempt to legitimise itClimate change is not an economic question. It's physics.
Wrong . Its entirely political being given faux scientific window dressing in an attempt to legitimise it
We’re you the one who thinks 20 million people die every year exclusively as a result of biofuels?
Wrong . Its entirely political being given faux scientific window dressing in an attempt to legitimise it
Please explain to us why the SPM was set in stone before the science of the AR6 and the AR6 is being edited as not to conflict with the SPM.Conspiracy theory.
Please explain to us why the SPM was set in stone before the science of the AR6 and the AR6 is being edited as not to conflict with the SPM.
Typical. You didn't read a single page.You can’t prove that.
Typical. You didn't read a single page.
Each of the pages in the final, that isn't really the final says its subject to editing. The SPM is the only section actually finalized, so they must make the science match the agenda.
It is implied since the SPM is the only section actually finalized.Does it use exactly those words? Show me.
It is implied since the SPM is the only section actually finalized.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?