- Joined
- Nov 20, 2013
- Messages
- 75,787
- Reaction score
- 58,111
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Yup.
Yup.We’ll just agree to disagree.
Whatever.
No, you didn't.
I quoted your post in my previous where you did ask and it didn't contain any of these 'after thought' specifics that you now include.
Quit making shit up as you go along.
Speaking up of making up shit as you go along . . .
Already asked and answered.
Thanks you.
and now you are moving the goal posts. This wasn't included in your post asking for the video, which I've quote previous.
No, you are. Sorry that you don't, or can't realize it, but you are. Simple fact.
Non sequitur. Your facts are uncoordinated.
In the same post you said:
"You keep saying I demanded it. That’s nonsense"
and also
"So again, but ok I ‘demanded’"
You appear to be so confused about everything so much so you can't even keep this simple thing straight.
Go take some time and figure it out.
Blather. Flailing. Doubling down.
Blather. Flailing. Doubling down.
Good try but don’t even try to lie to weasel out of it and claim you were simply talking about police holding open doors.
The truth is the ONLY reason you said it was to claim that there was some nefarious editing of videos that were being hidden from the public showing some fantasy other side that would exonerate people
As clearly shown in posts 2048, 2079 and on.
And it’s still a lie.
Apparently your comprehension of what moving a goal post is is as poor as your comprehension of the meaning of full context.
I'm slightly encouraged that you are realizing how far off you are.
I'm slightly encouraged that you are realizing how far off you are.
I'd call that progress.
Given your confused posting, as I've pointed out, these assertions of yours only continue in the same confused vein.No you’re not. And you know it isn’t.
It’s simply all just part of your always need to double down and project everytime your lies are shown for what they are, which is often.
Again, good try though. Please do keep doubling down, as if your original lie wasn’t embarrassing enough for you.
There may well be an 'emergency' if some Mayor thinks they can stand in the way of enforcement of federal law.Don't be surprised if this declared an 'emergency' and is used as a pretext for federal control and use of the military (national guard) on U.S. soil against a local population and local authorities.
lol. Probably telling the gun grabbers they told you so. Where are you? Can you point yourself out in one of the live feeds?Where are the Second Amendment freaks to defend us against a tyrannical, oppressive, fascist government?
In California?Where are the Second Amendment freaks to defend us against a tyrannical, oppressive, fascist government?
lol. Probably telling the gun grabbers they told you so. Where are you? Can you point yourself out in one of the live feeds?
You reap what you sow.You mean the pretense that the Second Amendment was needed to push back against a tyrannical government was always bullshit, and that these people would be more likely to aid in the oppression than protect the oppressed?
In California?
lulz
What does you showing one arrest mean here?1 arrested during anti-ICE protest in Dallas, police say
Protestors marched in Dallas on Monday night against ICE raids, aligning with demonstrators across the country in Los Angeles.www.wfaa.com
In Dallas no less lolWhat does you showing one arrest mean here?
You reap what you sow.
The gun grabbers (in this case in California) have no desire to promote the second amendment. Now you are asking where those who do are?
They are all in different States ...
What does you showing one arrest mean here?
Where are you? You’re blowing an awful lot of smoke on the internet.I'm saying the ICE protests are occurring in red states as well. Where are the 2nd A militias to provide them protection against the tyrannical government?
You can certainly think that but I think the problem is the agreement on fascism. I do disagree with you that if they thought that it was fascism, then they likely would (not too sure on numbers but some/most would)They can travel across state lines. Ask Kyle Rittenhouse.
No, I'm saying that those promote the Second Amendment as a defense against a tyrannical government are full of shit. I'm not asking them to do anything, I always knew they'd be more likely to side with fascists than protect citizens against fascism.
Likely ICE. Most 2nd amendment believers/proponents are staunch 'LAW' folks.If Texas 2nd Amendment Rights militias traveled to California, whose side would they be on? ICE or the protestors?
Not assisting is not the same as standing in the way.There may well be an 'emergency' if some Mayor thinks they can stand in the way of enforcement of federal law.
What the point of us having history if not to distort it? It's the MAGA way.Exactly 100%
All the ‘one sided’ nonsense from cult45/47 is just that, nonsense, distortions, cherry picking.
The reality is Cheney had already been appointed.
McCarthy submitted five additional names.
Pelosi approved three of them, Rodney Davis, Kelly Armstrong and Troy Nehls and asked for the two others be replaced. Rightfully so, Jordan was later subpoenaed to testify which he ignored.
Clearly none of the ones Pelosi approved would even remotely be considered ‘on her side’, or even fans of democrats, most certainly not rabid Trumphumper Troy Nehls.
It was McCarthy who threw a hissy fit and pulled all five. He thought if he pulled them all it would shut it all down.
Kinzinger was added after.
And more reality, the bottom line is the only reason the committee was even formed was because republicans had blocked the bipartisan commission, which would have even given them subpoena power, dear leader didn’t want it. They thought blocking it would put an end to any and all investigations.
No doubt. Minor little issue like "the Constitution".
On the other side of the line of contact. They're itching to stroke their love machines.Where are the Second Amendment freaks to defend us against a tyrannical, oppressive, fascist government?
There were no ICE vehicles burned in L.A. and there was no attempt in L.A. to overturn a fair election, as was the objective on Jan 6.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?