Flip parties.
Suppose it was a previous Democrat president in that court with those charges. Would you still feel the same and hold the same position?
I rather doubt it.
Nothing is tainted. The evidence proved his guilt. As far as switching parties, that means nothing to me. I'm neither Republican nor Democrat. Switch the parties and I feel thd same if the evidence proves guilt. Charge Biden. That would be political. If the evidence proves he's guilty, I want him charged. No one should be above the law.That it was politically motivated taints the entire proceedings, the judge, the decision, and especially the prosecutor and prosecution which bought this politically motivated case.
I would think that you'd object as much as I am when politicians use the courts and the legal system for their political purposes.
Your post quoted above appears that you aren't concerned about it, and this lack of concern has me concerned.
Flip parties.
Suppose it was a previous Democrat president in that court with those charges. Would you still feel the same and hold the same position?
I rather doubt it.
Honestly, I don't see how you could be confused.See my response on that in previous post. Appears that there may be some confusion as to which day Pence was in Congress at 3:40 AM.
Yes, yes. I'm aware of Menendez and his corruption. Funny thing is, there's not nearly the front page coverage and constant fauxraging had it been a non-Dem.Yes, we would still feel the same and hold the same position. Dems were actually embarrassed by Bob Menendez and couldn't wait until he was gone. He was a POS.
LOL. Yeah, yeah, sure sure. </sarcasm>And Menendez looks like a choir boy next to trump.
I misunderstood which specific day / date you were talking about.You just doubted it a few posts ago.
Again, you disputed this fact just a few posts back. How is it relevant? To those of us who have been debating you, it's yet another example of a trumpie not accepting even the most mundane bit of truth without a struggle.
Just did above. Wrong again. Oh well.Yeah, I don't think that's the problem here. I think the problem here is that you can't just admit when you are wrong.
Sorry, but this is not even remotely accurate.You describe EVERYTHING as subjective opinion. To you, water being wet is a subjective opinion.
So there's a difference of opinion on how many hours is 'a few'.Honestly, I don't see how you could be confused.
eohrnberger: "Yes, yes, this is the politically motivated push narrative from the left, yet within a mere few hours that electoral count was held."JohnfrmClevelan: "Yeah, at, like, 3:33 AM. Secret Service wanted to take Pence off campus, but he refused. Nothing to see here, just some rowdy tourists."
YOU pointed out the electoral count was delayed a few hours. John pointed out it was more than a few hours.
Can you explain how you thought time went backwards 24 hours, leading to your confusion?
I understand you politically motivated need for not acknowledging the various points about that case which I've already posted.Nothing is tainted.
The evidence proved his guilt. As far as switching parties, that means nothing to me. I'm neither Republican nor Democrat. Switch the parties and I feel thd same if the evidence proves guilt. Charge Biden. That would be political. If the evidence proves he's guilty, I want him charged. No one should be above the law.
<laughing>So there's a difference of opinion on how many hours is 'a few'.
My political motivation is no one should be above the law. Party affiliation plays absolutely no role in my position.I understand you politically motivated need for not acknowledging the various points about that case which I've already posted.
There's no point in discussing this any further with you.
Yes, yes. I'm aware of Menendez and his corruption. Funny thing is, there's not nearly the front page coverage and constant fauxraging had it been a non-Dem.
LOL. Yeah, yeah, sure sure. </sarcasm>
This is the opinion you've been told to parrot by the Dems' compliant and complicit propagandists in the MSM, and your liberal / progressive media echo chamber.
I misunderstood which specific day / date you were talking about.
My mistake was thinking that was 3:40 AM the day of the Electorate College Vote Certification in the House, before the riot, not the dark AM morning after the riot.
No, honest.That's pure horsesh!t.
More like the MSM is feeding off of their ginned up hoaxes an fauxrage those instigate.Your boy trump demands the headlines. He feeds on the attention.
So you've been told to believe.Also, he is far and away the most corrupt POTUS in U.S. history.
We've already covered this ground. If you don't recall, scroll backwards through the thread.No, I'm just going by the sheer number of indictments for serious crimes. (Plus the 34 convictions.)
To hell with MAGATS
Exterminate all of them
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?