- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 40,003
- Reaction score
- 17,353
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
We’ll see.I am all for folks from other countries to comment on our business.
When you call for mayhem here while you sit back in your recliner and just observe, I say stop.
All this can be solved, peacefully.
So again, no.
Bite me.
I think that this is the move to authoritarianism that end stage capitalism will require.Sorry, I disagree.
Non-violent revolutions have succeeded to some extent or another numerous times within the last century:
- The Indian Independence Movement
- The American Civil Rights Movement
- The Velvet Revolution
- The Singing Revolution
- The People Power Revolution
- The Orange Revolution
- The Rose Revolution
- The early part of the Tunisian Revolution
- The Berlin Wall Fall
- The Sudanese Revolution
- The early part of the Anti-Apartheid Movement
Where there's a will, there's a way. You are not powerless. You just need to find the will.
Of course, if you are really "powerless", why are you here? Why bother talking about this at all? Is it actually just a giant bitch fest, an opportunity to harvest dopamine by being ugly to each other? I really need to know.
Australian woman says she was deported after visiting US army husband at Hawaii base
Nicolle Saroukos, 25, of Sydney, says she was held in federal prison overnight before she was deportedwww.independent.co.uk
Unbelievable.
I don't think so and sure as hell don't believe your bullshit. Must be nice to be able to ignore fascist assholes.Bullshit.
Imagine if even 10% of these "stories" had a shred of fact to them..
At this moment, ICE is being used as a gestapo to harass citizens and non-citizens.You still don't know what ICE does.
ICE gets vilified because they are villains. Im sure if you talk to evil they try to seem sympathetic but their actions are all that i need to know. If you do evil all the time when the opportunity gives you the chance. That is your character.Vilifying the ICE was the kind of tactic that gave Trump the election in the first place. If Biden had simply been willing to enforce the law more or less as written and respect the people who have to enforce it, then we would never have been in the position of having no vaccine and no researchers and no public health people and being about to see half the country die of avian flu while the Chinese and the Europeans gladly deploy their public health resources to save themselves. Was it worth it, to vilify a group of people we never talked to and never listened to?
MAGA is responsible for who they voted for.Vilifying the ICE was the kind of tactic that gave Trump the election in the first place. If Biden had simply been willing to enforce the law more or less as written and respect the people who have to enforce it, then we would never have been in the position of having no vaccine and no researchers and no public health people and being about to see half the country die of avian flu while the Chinese and the Europeans gladly deploy their public health resources to save themselves. Was it worth it, to vilify a group of people we never talked to and never listened to?
Sorry, I disagree.
Non-violent revolutions have succeeded to some extent or another numerous times within the last century:
- The Indian Independence Movement
- The American Civil Rights Movement
- The Velvet Revolution
- The Singing Revolution
- The People Power Revolution
- The Orange Revolution
- The Rose Revolution
- The early part of the Tunisian Revolution
- The Berlin Wall Fall
- The Sudanese Revolution
- The early part of the Anti-Apartheid Movement
Where there's a will, there's a way. You are not powerless. You just need to find the will.
Of course, if you are really "powerless", why are you here? Why bother talking about this at all? Is it actually just a giant bitch fest, an opportunity to harvest dopamine by being ugly to each other? I really need to know.
I think that the stages described by Lenin need to be taken with some skepticism. Yes, capitalism devolves that way, and has devolved that way here. We are in the stage of "moribund capitalism" with large single owners dominating the market and fighting each other for control. And Lenin did show that a dictatorship can take over from them.End stage capitalism will require authoritarianism.
What is nonviolence really getting us? We’re getting more genocide, more deaths, and a ruling class that wants to kill us all.I agree, it's time for a nonviolent movement across this country.
But even when the profits of those capitalists are threatened, they will turn. There is no reform option, we’ve had decades upon decades to reform this system and the fact that capitalists react this violently to tepid reforms show that they must be ousted from power by the working class.I think that the stages described by Lenin need to be taken with some skepticism. Yes, capitalism devolves that way, and has devolved that way here. We are in the stage of "moribund capitalism" with large single owners dominating the market and fighting each other for control. And Lenin did show that a dictatorship can take over from them.
However, the dictatorship isn't really "of the proletariat", but of the dictator. The difference between a fascist takeover of the economy and a communist takeover of the economy seems a lot less than you'd expect. Sure, the communists have some rhetoric about equality, but they don't always live up to it. Now, to be sure, there are some instances, as with China in recent decades, where they really do increase the standard of living of the common people. But there is also an alternative.
When we look at the 1890s "Gilded Age", the U.S. was also in moribund capitalism. The Trusts were in control. Yet instead of devolving to fascism or communism, at some point our society regressed, went back to an earlier stage of capitalism, with the help of anti-trust laws and heavy, heavy taxes on the wealthy.
A big part of this may have to do with what the capitalists themselves can be tricked into. The oligarchs of Russia are the ones who forced the country to end up under Putin. Only to find out that they no longer had any real power, that any money they retain is only through sufferance of their overlord. It wasn't exactly the smartest way to ensure a happy retirement... By comparison, in the U.S. you had various oligarchs who supported democratic reforms.
What is nonviolence really getting us? We’re getting more genocide, more deaths, and a ruling class that wants to kill us all.
Aside from advocating violence being against the TOS, there have been successful revolutions in which fighting occurred, the American revolution accomplished its goals. The Vietnamese revolution eventually accomplished its goals, the bolshevik, and the slave revolts all pushed past a tipping point so i do not discount all violence as being unsuccessful. I do not frown upon those who violently resist brutal oppression in general.
The American Revolution was a separatist movement (like the former Soviet & Yugoslav republics). The Vietnamese revolution was really a civil war in which hegemonic powers took sides, using the civil war combatants as proxies.
Acts of violence in a context such as this one can result in full-on civil war. The 1850s had a lot of examples of violence that pushed two sides closer to all-out civil war, as did the late Roman republic.
That said businesses wont just use Trump to undo.We haven't done much. Shutting down whole businesses or economies? Now that's a nonviolent protest.
The vietnamese were fighting against imperialist powers and the puppet government which was attempting violent cultural erasure. If they did not fight more buddhist monks would be self immolating.
They were also the ones who stopped Pol Pot while kissinger was thinking about allying with him.
Now they are a relatively successful country.
I aint sayin its always the solution, im sayin its a tool that cant be rejected when state violence is the norm. If you have something that actually builds lasting change without violence im all for it.
Yeah i think i eventually got what you were saying and agree.My point is, whether violence can achieve a political goal depends on the context.
Julius Caesar was murdered on the floor of the Roman senate. That led to civil war, which ultimately resulted in the end of the Roman republic, though the republic was already plagued by centuries of rampant corruption that likely would have smothered democracy eventually anyway.
Yeah i think i eventually got what you were saying and agree.
Least we are talking again.I never thought we disagreed. We were just talking about the same issue from different angles.
Don't accuse me of being dishonest or disingenuous. Engage with me without name-calling or suggesting nefarious motives (racism, etc...). That's about it. You do a good job of it, from what I recall.I'm still trying to figure out how to do that without pissing you off
I think on many things that's a possibility. We all have our biases and sacred cows. But I'd say my thoughts above were less "assumptions" than "plausible alternatives to the way things are being portrayed."Do you think it's possible that your assumptions are at all driven by your partisanship
Fire away, bud!Is that an interesting enough tangent for you to participate in exploring? I would enjoy hearing your thoughts - especially if you keep writing like the above.
What does ICE have to do with this woman's refused admission?At this moment, ICE is being used as a gestapo to harass citizens and non-citizens.
Defending their actions is grossly inappropriate.
I wasn’t speaking from a communist perspective.I think that the stages described by Lenin need to be taken with some skepticism. Yes, capitalism devolves that way, and has devolved that way here. We are in the stage of "moribund capitalism" with large single owners dominating the market and fighting each other for control. And Lenin did show that a dictatorship can take over from them.
However, the dictatorship isn't really "of the proletariat", but of the dictator. The difference between a fascist takeover of the economy and a communist takeover of the economy seems a lot less than you'd expect. Sure, the communists have some rhetoric about equality, but they don't always live up to it. Now, to be sure, there are some instances, as with China in recent decades, where they really do increase the standard of living of the common people. But there is also an alternative.
When we look at the 1890s "Gilded Age", the U.S. was also in moribund capitalism. The Trusts were in control. Yet instead of devolving to fascism or communism, at some point our society regressed, went back to an earlier stage of capitalism, with the help of anti-trust laws and heavy, heavy taxes on the wealthy.
A big part of this may have to do with what the capitalists themselves can be tricked into. The oligarchs of Russia are the ones who forced the country to end up under Putin. Only to find out that they no longer had any real power, that any money they retain is only through sufferance of their overlord. It wasn't exactly the smartest way to ensure a happy retirement... By comparison, in the U.S. you had various oligarchs who supported democratic reforms.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?