doughgirl said:
Steen said, “Your drawing false analogies and misrepresenting science doesn't make you right.”
Steen it wouldn’t matter what I posted or from what source. I do not misrepresent science. I have posted sources where I have gotten information. You think every one of those are not valid?
Rather, if they are not scientific sites, their political claims are not validated.
Bottom line your mind is made up.
I have an opinion, that's all. If you show actual evidence to the contrary, then I certainly will pay6 attention. But piosting what has been shown to be lies long ago won't do it.
Now, when talking about having your mind made up, when you make claims directly contradicted by evidence, refusing to take evidence into account, then YOUR mind certainly is made up regardless of evidence. So your claim now is shown to be
EXTREMELY HYPOCRITICAL.
You are for the slaughter of the unborn child.
Ah, more prolife, deceptive, revisionist linguistic, emotional hyperbole.
You believe this slaughter is fine until delivery when it automatically becomes a child.
I believe it is a medical decision and none of your business.
No amount of information is going to change your opinion.
Oh, now you are talking to the mirror. (yes, you are still hypocritical.)
I say opinions because you never site sources, websites, books…….that back your claims up. You simply state OPINION.
Now you are
LYING. As is, of course, expected when you are posting.
First of all did you read ALL THE SOURCES I POSTED? You’re telling me these doctors are all quacks, frauds……..that EVERYTHING they talk about has no scientific basis at all?
They are stating personal, political opinions. Scientific sources contradict their claims.
Tell me or post then the scientific sites and sources that have validity? :roll:
That would be those that are actually scientific. you know, sources that are peer-reviewed and contain information derived through the Scientific Method. You **DO** know what that is, right? No? never heard of it? Well, I am not surprised, per the quality of your posts.
I gave men and woman who testified at Senate hearings……..and your saying they are all quacks?
Rather, they are expressing political views, not scientific ones.
Contrary to what you say, I have most the sources at hand. I work in this field, (Right To Life) and we have extensive libraries with information from both sides of this issue.
Right-to-life spews lies time after time.
I would suggest stepping out of your box and reading some of them, instead of just bashing them when you obviously have no idea what they contain.
I have seen your claims and the claims of prolife sites and resources. They are full of lies.