Proudly Pro Life JP Freem
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2005
- Messages
- 340
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Proudly Pro Life JP Freem said:I would not let anyone who performs abortions do any medical procedure on me or my family or my dog.
vergiss said:Aah, natural selection at its finest.
Proudly Pro Life JP Freem said:What do you mean by that? Abortion is not natural?
No, I merely see the 'thoughts" of a machine or a toll as silly and stupid. It has no bearing on reality and is solely designed for emotional reaction. It is stupdi and deceptive propaganda, nothing else.doughgirl said:God you are cold.
traumatized? I never had any trauma, I had a great life. And I feel just fine. I feel just fine that prolifers who use lies to try to enslave women with no acknowledgement ever of the woamn are scumbag liars.What ever happened to you that traumatized you to such an extent that you can't feel?
Proudly Pro Life JP Freem said:What do you mean by that? Abortion is not natural?
Neither is any kind of medical treatment whatsoever. Neither are computers.Proudly Pro Life JP Freem said:What do you mean by that? Abortion is not natural?
Yes, women were willing to risk a very real chance of death to obtain an abortion. Thanks for showing that banning abortions WILL result in women dying.Aurora151989 said:I think it's not natural, as no other animal does abortions. If they lose the litter, it's because of a miscarriage or some other reason. Before abortion was invented, yes women tried using sterilized sticks but I imagine they died trying so they only used it as a last resort... ie they will die.
steen said:Yes, women were willing to risk a very real chance of death to obtain an abortion. Thanks for showing that banning abortions WILL result in women dying.
BTW, the genus lagopus have shown ability to cause their own miscarriages.
steen said:http://www.fbn-dummerstorf.de/de/Info/Archiv/pdf/2003/heft4-2003/10maray034.pdf
(page 368, 3rd line)
And in my search I did find this:
http://www.sdgfp.info/Wildlife/Diversity/battechreport.pdf
Search on "reabsorption of the embryo"
http://www.popline.org/docs/0046/710698.html
I never said they did.Aurora151989 said:These 3 sources talk about embryo reabsorption and spontaneous abortion. A spontaneous abortion is the same as a miscarriage in people. I'm sure embryo reabsorption also happens in women, but we don't know about it. The rabbits and bats are not thinking "i'm pregnant, i think i'll abort by eating some plant that will make me not pregnant.
What facts are you presenting? most of what you have posted are hyperbole and quite incorrect, as I have pointed out.doughgirl said:I am emotional about this. I present the facts but yes, this is an emotional topic to me.
What a silly claim. "machine like" Just because I don't engage in hysterics and emotional whining and moaning? Just becasue I don't buy any lie even if it is presented with prolife emotional hyperbole? I only seem emotionless in contrast with the prolife howling and yammering and hand-wringing.Contrary to yours that are EMOTIONLESS………….devoid of fact and compassion……..clinical, machinelike…………..
Gladly.What have I lied about? Post one thing………….then site facts to back up your claim……….
Ah, so detesting liars is now wrong? yes, I can see how an opposition to liars would be inconvenient to you.“Every lie prolifers spew, every emotional, dishonest manipulation and false witness spewed by you people support my impression and further cement my disgust with you all.”
And that my dear is why I continue………..to show a side so cold and clinical a side so inhumane……….that people take notice.
I will continue to expose your side………..and thanks for helping.
AGAIN? You already asked this once, and I showed you. Ah, well. here is the link to where I detailed your quote:doughgirl said:steen i see you have quoted me at the bottom of your page............could you please post where I ever said this?
jfuh said:The only reason that there are so many abortion clinics that lack proper equipment and other surgical tools is the direct cause of pro-life state laws. As much as you try to limit the pro-choice the worse you are going to make it for women. In the end it could be your own that is seeking an abortion but can not find a place to safely perform it, resulting in back alley operations.
All this pro-life activism is nothing more than religious fundamentalism trying to combine church and state. To regulate state through church propaganda. To all those pro-life, sorry, but abortion is a constitutionally established right for women, not a priveledge as is driving. Regardless of how you try to change the law in your favor, in the end, the constitution will still protect a womans right and anyone that makes the choice is still going to win her right. All you are doing is prohibiting that right and causing more poverty and more messed up teenagers or single women - chipping away at women's rights and creating an ever more patriarcial society like that of Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afganistan and so on. Go ahead, practice your religious fundamentalism but only to yourselves and leave the rest of us to be.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?