Brother AJ
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2014
- Messages
- 560
- Reaction score
- 101
- Location
- Fort Worth, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Okay? That still doesn't justify your actions.I am not a vegan. I use leather products I eat meat and I kill pests
Yet if people are willing to pay $350,000 to shoot an old one on it's last legs, and that money goes to fund conservation projects for the rest, it seems reasonable...
It's entirely possible said animal was physically capable of preventing others from breeding but did not have the capability himself anymore.If hes so far on his last legs then why is he "supposedly" constantly fit enough to halt others from breeding before they are ready? This story has holes in it no matter what.
IOW: what you're saying is shut up. What happened to the 1st amendment?
Why are you opposed to freedom of speech? Fill us in.
"The only valid censorship of ideas is the right of people not to listen." ~ Tommy Smothers
It's also entirely possible that this is a ridiculous reason to justify ending someone's life.It's entirely possible said animal was physically capable of preventing others from breeding but did not have the capability himself anymore.
Asking someone to stop, hell, even outright telling someone to shut up, does not equate to preventing their free speech.IOW: what you're saying is shut up. What happened to the 1st amendment?
Why are you opposed to freedom of speech? Fill us in.
"The only valid censorship of ideas is the right of people not to listen." ~ Tommy Smothers
Quite true.It's also entirely possible that this is a ridiculous reason to justify ending someone's life.
It's entirely possible said animal was physically capable of preventing others from breeding but did not have the capability himself anymore.
What actions?Okay? That still doesn't justify your actions.
Telling someone to shut up is every bit a right of free speech as what was initially said. Forcing them to shut up is another topic... one that didn't happen here.
Wrong.
If you don't like what someone is saying don't listen to them. :roll:
Asking someone to stop, hell, even outright telling someone to shut up, does not equate to preventing their free speech.
Only if your forcibly prevent them from speaking does it reach that point.
Well, if you really want to redistribute income, you could advertise 13 year old girls virginity for less money and make a huge profit.
Do you actually know anything about animal cognition, or do you just pretend to? Science would indicate otherwise.
The actions I just quoted, and the killing of this rhino.What actions?
How intellectually stimulating your comments are.:lamo :bs
Stepping on cockroaches? Or eating flesh of another animal? Well, roaches are lower lifeforms and they are pests. Eating flesh? Well I'm a human and humans are predators and carnivorous. So it is in my nature to eat the flesh of another animal. Thus neither needs to be justified.,The actions I just quoted
I didn't kill any rhino.and the killing of this rhino.
It wasn't to give a donation, it was to eliminate non breeding animals that prevent the future breeding of offspring. They are simply hunted too much for this to take its natural course. Killing the animal was to allow breeding stock to help the population grow.Why did this guy have to kill something to give a $350k donation.
From what I have read about the white rhinos they are extinct.This is not about the donation at all. It is the showing off of not only ones ability to afford such a thing, but also ones ability to hunt down what people believe to be a dangerous animal. This guys is playing off of the ignorance of all of you here.
It wasn't to give a donation, it was to eliminate non breeding animals that prevent the future breeding of offspring. They are simply hunted too much for this to take its natural course. Killing the animal was to allow breeding stock to help the population grow. From what I have read about the white rhinos they are extinct.
Northern white rhinoceros - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Only one was causing a problem.
The actions I just quoted, and the killing of this rhino.
How intellectually stimulating your comments are.
The article did not claim any problems. However, the article did state that they sell 5 kill licences a year (whether the animal is an asshole, old or both). If the hunter is so god-damned concerned about rhinos as he says he is, why doesn't he just donate the money... period? That right... he does not give a flying ****.
The article did not claim any problems. However, the article did state that they sell 5 kill licences a year (whether the animal is an asshole, old or both). If the hunter is so god-damned concerned about rhinos as he says he is, why doesn't he just donate the money... period? That right... he does not give a flying ****.
How silly the animal rights idiocy is
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?