- Joined
- Aug 25, 2019
- Messages
- 41,352
- Reaction score
- 30,404
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
So. Even if I did I'm pretty sure the goalposts would be moved.If you can’t cite what you claim, it’s merely a baseless assertion.
So. Even if I did I'm pretty sure the goalposts would be moved.If you can’t cite what you claim, it’s merely a baseless assertion.
^ Explains the screen user name.I really don't care.
Whatever.Sure you do.. I can't stand liars on the internets
'Appears to have' suddenly means authentic?If you bothered to read the O/P, nobody would have to copy and paste for you....
Facts. They can be inconvenient.If you bothered to read the O/P, nobody would have to copy and paste for you....
Facts. They can be inconvenient.
Ain't that the truth!It kills me that some are so lazy that they don't even bother to read the O/P source before jumping in like they know it all....
'Appears to have' suddenly means authentic?
Like you when you made the false assertion that someone had committed a crime before they entered the country and that they had entered illegally to begin with...when in reality the guy entered the US on a visa that expired(under Trump btw) and hadn't committed a crime before entry....those false assertions? And then you ran from the thread after claiming your false assertions weren't importantIt kills me that some are so lazy that they don't even bother to read the O/P source before jumping in like they know it all....
Neither Joe, nor Hunter have commented on it, have they? Plausible deniability at work.Let me guess, you didn't even bother to read what I quoted from the O/P "The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation."
The facts you have not provided? You've spread rumors and gossip, but that's itFacts. They can be inconvenient.
Are they required to comment? Show me where under law they are required to comment at all?Neither Joe, nor Hunter have commented on it, have they. Plausible deniability at work.
Changing the subject?Like you when you made the false assertion that someone had committed a crime before they entered the country and that they had entered illegally to begin with...when in reality the guy entered the US on a visa that expired(under Trump btw) and hadn't committed a crime before entry....those false assertions? And then you ran from the thread after claiming your false assertions weren't important
Pointing out hypocrisy. Again...appears to be doesn't equal authenticationChanging the subject?
I don't work for the NYT. Shouldn't you be complaining to them?The facts you have not provided? You've spread rumors and gossip, but that's it
The thread isn't about that.Pointing out hypocrisy. Again...appears to be doesn't equal authentication
You're making the claims...perhaps email them and ask for proof.I don't work for the NYT. Shouldn't you be complaining to them?
Like you when you made the false assertion that someone had committed a crime before they entered the country and that they had entered illegally to begin with...when in reality the guy entered the US on a visa that expired(under Trump btw) and hadn't committed a crime before entry....those false assertions? And then you ran from the thread after claiming your false assertions weren't important
Exactly...Whatever.
Yeah, you and Trix tagging each other kind of made it that way.The thread isn't about that.
How do you feel about people taking the Fifth?Are they required to comment? Show me where under law they are required to comment at all?
Neither Joe, nor Hunter have commented on it, have they? Plausible deniability at work.
Thread can be about whatever we want now. You don't hold yourself to any standard so why the **** should anyone else ?The thread isn't about that.
The thread isn't about either of us.Yeah, you and Trix tagging each other kind of made it that way.
Nope....do you understand the difference between 'appears to be' and authenticated? That's in your link yet you claim they were authenticatedFalse equivalency, and the usual ClaraD goal post shifting.
I accept your concession.