• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hunter Biden's laptop acknowledged by the NY times

'Appears to have' suddenly means authentic?

Let me guess, you didn't even bother to read what I quoted from the O/P "The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation."
 
It kills me that some are so lazy that they don't even bother to read the O/P source before jumping in like they know it all....
Like you when you made the false assertion that someone had committed a crime before they entered the country and that they had entered illegally to begin with...when in reality the guy entered the US on a visa that expired(under Trump btw) and hadn't committed a crime before entry....those false assertions? And then you ran from the thread after claiming your false assertions weren't important
 
Let me guess, you didn't even bother to read what I quoted from the O/P "The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation."
Neither Joe, nor Hunter have commented on it, have they? Plausible deniability at work.
 
Like you when you made the false assertion that someone had committed a crime before they entered the country and that they had entered illegally to begin with...when in reality the guy entered the US on a visa that expired(under Trump btw) and hadn't committed a crime before entry....those false assertions? And then you ran from the thread after claiming your false assertions weren't important
Changing the subject?
 
The facts you have not provided? You've spread rumors and gossip, but that's it
I don't work for the NYT. Shouldn't you be complaining to them?
 
Like you when you made the false assertion that someone had committed a crime before they entered the country and that they had entered illegally to begin with...when in reality the guy entered the US on a visa that expired(under Trump btw) and hadn't committed a crime before entry....those false assertions? And then you ran from the thread after claiming your false assertions weren't important

False equivalency, and the usual ClaraD goal post shifting.

I accept your concession.
 
Back
Top Bottom