A lot of date playing here by the media. I first read about this find a few years ago, in one of the Israeli newspapers, before any peer reviews were available. Look around, you'll find more than a few similar finds in areas of Europe, particularly Spain, Europe, and most recently the British Isles, the Russian steppes, various parts of China, even in South and Central America, with dating analysis reaching as far back as 400k years ago. Questions, of course about dating methods, since these finds challenge the currently popular out of Africa theories and a rigid archeological and anthropological status quo. No one is venturing a guess about human remains, modern human remains found recently in Australia, possibility dating back 300k years, well before any known migrations to the subcontinent can be established.
Unfortunately, our theorists are stuck with evidence that has been found, not found yet doesn't enter the equations. But it looks like the the out of Africa theories may be biting the dust, along with the concept of a single common progenitor species. Denisovans comes to mind, how many others we haven't begun to speculate about as we develop better DNA and now RNA analytical tools. It may well come to a point whereby we no longer need to rely on fossil finds, there may be living evidence. Sheer speculation now, may become meatier with more time passing.
It was believed that the Gaelic language was imported to Eire. Recent linguistic theory is beginning to show the opposite. While the Romans invented the Celts to explain those they found in lands they conquered and make for a common culturally united enemy, and historians along with linguists traced the language back to India when East Indian Company troops found bagpipe players in northern India, and Gaelic speaking Irish travelers to the Pyrenees found they could easily understand some of the Basque languages. More recent examination of the cultural paths show the cultural migration may have been reversed for political reasons, and in fact the cultural migration may have started is Eire, export both northeasterly and southerly. The Etruscans who the Romans absorbed as second citizens of Rome (the first citizens actually a bunch of Greeks from Asia Minor), were Celts by Roman definition.
Recent examinations of the Catalan language showing it is not related to Spanish, vulgar Latin spoken by the Romans who colonised the Tarragona area along with recognizable Gaelic words and phrases, but more important Gaelic speaking rhythms, indicate, along with other "forgotten, not so forgotten" much older Iberian and southern French languages indicated evidence of that Gaelic migration.
"I'm so confused." Vinnie Barbarino
Perhaps even a reason to re-examine your signature line, "there's more to the apple than meets the mind at first look." Here we have a lesson about the superficial pondering of mankind, use it.