• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

HUCK FINN & THE N-WORD

JacksinPA

JacksinPA

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
26,290
Reaction score
16,776
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive

Library Guides: Banned Books Week Guide: Huck Finn & the N-Word

October 1 - October 7, 2023
davenport.libguides.com davenport.libguides.com

CHANGING HUCK FINN​

Mark Twain's classic, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, has been under scrutiny for the use of language since it was first published in 1884. It continues to be one of the most challenged books in the United States. In 1885, the Concord Public Library banned the book for its "coarse language." Critics deemed Twain's use of slang as demeaning and damaging. One reviewer called it "the veriest trash more suited to the slums than to intelligent, respectable people." The Brooklyn Public Library banned the book in 1905 for the use of the word "sweat" (instead of perspiration) and for saying, "Huck not only itched but scratched." Twain fired back by saying, "Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it." Although the "n" word appears 200+ times in the book, it didn't initially cause much controversy. More recently Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has been banned or challenged for racial slurs.

In 2011 NewSouth published a sanitized version of the book by replacing the word "nigger" with "slave" and the word "injun" with "Indian." An English professor at Auburn University at Montgomery proposed the idea to the publisher because he felt the pervasive use of the slurs made it more difficult for students to read the book. In an introduction to the new edition he wrote, “even at the level of college and graduate school, students are capable of resenting textual encounters with this racial appellative.”

You can read the complete, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, here, made possible by Project Gutenburg.
======================================================================
Books have been banned because of either the language used or the central topic since the 19th century. The repugs are only trying stir up popular emotions around a nothing topic.
 
Last edited:
I agree that word should be deleted.

There is simply no excuse for using that word today.

It could only hurt the feelings of many people.

We should let that word die a natural death.
 
Just don't mess with the damned book! It was written in an era where that particular word was widely accepted. If you don't want it on your bookshelf then don't buy it. Same applies to the "gay" books they talk about today.
 
TheParser said:
I agree that word should be deleted.

There is simply no excuse for using that word today.

It could only hurt the feelings of many people.

We should let that word die a natural death.
Click to expand...
That word has been in common usage since long before the Civil War & during the Tulsa & Ocoee Massacres in the 1920s. There are a lot of words in common usage that are considered unacceptable in classrooms as well as polite society but they are used often in slang & every day usage. But the repugs are making political theater out of them. They (the repugs) don't have enough to do.
 
That's stupid. Leave it be. It demonstrates how people behaved in that time period.

Jesus, next they'll be after Rudyard Kipling.
 
TheParser said:
I agree that word should be deleted.
Click to expand...
I disagree.

Huck Finn is a literary work. It's not fair to the author to edit or make changes to the text - even misspellings.

Literary works should remain unmolested.

History Books - - I have no problem deleting the N word from them.
TheParser said:
There is simply no excuse for using that word today.

It could only hurt the feelings of many people.
Click to expand...
It would be fine to put some disclaimer on books or literary works which contain the N word, to protect those who might be offended - but without changing the actual text of the work.
 
Publishers are free to do as they choose. But I won’t buy one.
 
JacksinPA said:

Library Guides: Banned Books Week Guide: Huck Finn & the N-Word

October 1 - October 7, 2023
davenport.libguides.com davenport.libguides.com

CHANGING HUCK FINN​

Mark Twain's classic, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, has been under scrutiny for the use of language since it was first published in 1884. It continues to be one of the most challenged books in the United States. In 1885, the Concord Public Library banned the book for its "coarse language." Critics deemed Twain's use of slang as demeaning and damaging. One reviewer called it "the veriest trash more suited to the slums than to intelligent, respectable people." The Brooklyn Public Library banned the book in 1905 for the use of the word "sweat" (instead of perspiration) and for saying, "Huck not only itched but scratched." Twain fired back by saying, "Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it." Although the "n" word appears 200+ times in the book, it didn't initially cause much controversy. More recently Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has been banned or challenged for racial slurs.

In 2011 NewSouth published a sanitized version of the book by replacing the word "nigger" with "slave" and the word "injun" with "Indian." An English professor at Auburn University at Montgomery proposed the idea to the publisher because he felt the pervasive use of the slurs made it more difficult for students to read the book. In an introduction to the new edition he wrote, “even at the level of college and graduate school, students are capable of resenting textual encounters with this racial appellative.”

You can read the complete, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, here, made possible by Project Gutenburg.
======================================================================
Books have been banned because of either the language used or the central topic since the 19th century. The repugs are only trying stir up popular emotions around a nothing topic.
Click to expand...
 
JacksinPA said:

Library Guides: Banned Books Week Guide: Huck Finn & the N-Word

October 1 - October 7, 2023
davenport.libguides.com davenport.libguides.com

CHANGING HUCK FINN​

Mark Twain's classic, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, has been under scrutiny for the use of language since it was first published in 1884. It continues to be one of the most challenged books in the United States. In 1885, the Concord Public Library banned the book for its "coarse language." Critics deemed Twain's use of slang as demeaning and damaging. One reviewer called it "the veriest trash more suited to the slums than to intelligent, respectable people." The Brooklyn Public Library banned the book in 1905 for the use of the word "sweat" (instead of perspiration) and for saying, "Huck not only itched but scratched." Twain fired back by saying, "Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it." Although the "n" word appears 200+ times in the book, it didn't initially cause much controversy. More recently Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has been banned or challenged for racial slurs.

In 2011 NewSouth published a sanitized version of the book by replacing the word "nigger" with "slave" and the word "injun" with "Indian." An English professor at Auburn University at Montgomery proposed the idea to the publisher because he felt the pervasive use of the slurs made it more difficult for students to read the book. In an introduction to the new edition he wrote, “even at the level of college and graduate school, students are capable of resenting textual encounters with this racial appellative.”

You can read the complete, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, here, made possible by Project Gutenburg.
======================================================================
Books have been banned because of either the language used or the central topic since the 19th century. The repugs are only trying stir up popular emotions around a nothing topic.
Click to expand...
While I can agree with the idea that a book such as this should have a warning or disclosure that the language used is not acceptable in today's society, it should not be altered. As long as it is not illegal to own, buy or sell (true censorship), then I could care less who wants to carry it or not. Bookstores will, for the most part, continue to carry it, especially when local book "bans" happen, because people will buy a copy just to spite those wanting to ban the book.
 
JacksinPA said:

Library Guides: Banned Books Week Guide: Huck Finn & the N-Word

October 1 - October 7, 2023
davenport.libguides.com davenport.libguides.com

CHANGING HUCK FINN​

Mark Twain's classic, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, has been under scrutiny for the use of language since it was first published in 1884. It continues to be one of the most challenged books in the United States. In 1885, the Concord Public Library banned the book for its "coarse language." Critics deemed Twain's use of slang as demeaning and damaging. One reviewer called it "the veriest trash more suited to the slums than to intelligent, respectable people." The Brooklyn Public Library banned the book in 1905 for the use of the word "sweat" (instead of perspiration) and for saying, "Huck not only itched but scratched." Twain fired back by saying, "Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it." Although the "n" word appears 200+ times in the book, it didn't initially cause much controversy. More recently Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has been banned or challenged for racial slurs.

In 2011 NewSouth published a sanitized version of the book by replacing the word "nigger" with "slave" and the word "injun" with "Indian." An English professor at Auburn University at Montgomery proposed the idea to the publisher because he felt the pervasive use of the slurs made it more difficult for students to read the book. In an introduction to the new edition he wrote, “even at the level of college and graduate school, students are capable of resenting textual encounters with this racial appellative.”

You can read the complete, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, here, made possible by Project Gutenburg.
======================================================================
Books have been banned because of either the language used or the central topic since the 19th century. The repugs are only trying stir up popular emotions around a nothing topic.
Click to expand...
I hate the 'n-word'. Imo, we would be better served if we tasted the bile rising from using the actual derogatory term. Pretending we didn't live the way people lived in the past is a disservice to everyone.
 
nope. Then You might as well just take Twain's name off the book if you are going to replace his words with someone elses. Next you will be sanitizing both his ideas and his words to conform with modern values. Its not today's standards that you are teaching when you teach this work. Its the standards of 1884 as Mark Twain interpreted them. Words change meaning. Words have different connotations and they served to accomplish different goals in 1884 when Twain used them than they do today.


The narrative has context, the characters are drawn from people Twain knew and grew up with, and the language that they used provides the color and realism to those characters. Thats all part of learning how to read literature.
 
Luce said:
That's stupid. Leave it be. It demonstrates how people behaved in that time period.

Jesus, next they'll be after Rudyard Kipling.
Click to expand...

Boo ****ing hoo. Literal racial slurs can safely be edited out without changing shit.
 
publishing a sanitized version
seems different than
never publishing the original version ever again


Lots of classics get dumbed-down, simplified versions made of them for younger readers
 
Let's rewrite Mark Twain. Times have changed and now we know better.

The hubris.

Everyone who's actually read the book will have their opinion taken seriously.

Is The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn a Racist Book?

Let's be careful on this one. I believe direct quotes from the book should be allowed but the mods may disagree.
debatepolitics.com debatepolitics.com
 
Loulit01 said:
Let's rewrite Mark Twain. Times have changed and now we know better.

The hubris.

Everyone who's actually read the book will have their opinion taken seriously.

Is The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn a Racist Book?

Let's be careful on this one. I believe direct quotes from the book should be allowed but the mods may disagree.
debatepolitics.com debatepolitics.com
Click to expand...
Yes it is a racist book, written in racist times.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Boo ****ing hoo. Literal racial slurs can safely be edited out without changing shit.
Click to expand...
It literally is 'changing shit'. Those 'slurs' were common regional vernacular. Everyday people brought up in that time period, in the geographic area used those terms to describe black people. It would be out of character for them not to use them. We have no business sanitizing what Twain actually wrote to appease you or anyone else. If he wanted to use 'slave', then he would have written 'slave' instead of the word he chose. Language and society changes, and specific words gain or lose connotations. Some end up with 'baggage' that gets so heavy we barely use them at all as time goes by. These are concepts that you can teach a middle schooler or high schooler and they are concepts you should teach when you teach literature, or history.

If I will forgive an author of fiction or poetry today deciding to use those words to help describe or define a racist character or time he is creating (maybe an imaginary KKK wizard or a neo-nazi on the blogsphere for example) , I sure as hell will not be in favor of censoring Twain when he is doing the same thing over a hundred years ago. We DO NOT rewrite literature to erase what offends our sensibilities!
 
Last edited:
"Mark Twain was American literature’s first critical race theorist as well as America’s greatest writer. His most famous work, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, is a nihilistic satire about systematic racial and gender oppression, a rejection of sanctioned education and religion, and a searing metaphor for the failure of Reconstruction. But for over 130 years, no one got the joke, so to speak, or, if they did, their voices went unheard. Instead, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was turned into a comic book, a Disney riverboat ride, a movie vehicle for Mickey Rooney’s overacting and Ken Burns’s slow pan. The joke that Twain so artfully and ironically crafted was that America was a nation of freedom and equality where everyone had “unalienable rights.” And since Adventures of Huckleberry Finn’s publication in 1886, in addition to being one of the most frequently banned novels, it has been consistently and carefully misread by generations of scholars who, consciously or not, were collaborators in the whitewashing of American literature and history. Twain’s covert and disruptive meanings were as submerged as the wrecked steamboat Walter Scott, and his audience both then and now was inclined not to look beneath the surface of the muddy Mississippi."

www.insidehighered.com

Mark Twain was American lit's first critical race theorist (opinion)

Laura Skandera Trombley and Ann Ryan explore Mark Twain’s writing as just one example of how thoroughly American it is to try to unravel the knot of race, racism and U.S. history.
www.insidehighered.com www.insidehighered.com
 
Lutherf said:
Just don't mess with the damned book! It was written in an era where that particular word was widely accepted. If you don't want it on your bookshelf then don't buy it. Same applies to the "gay" books they talk about today.
Click to expand...
Isn't this a free speech issue that so many on here defend? I once tried to read a Dan Bongino book that I thought was going to be about the secret service that soon turned into a book bashing obama. I stopped reading a short way into the book. Why more folks can't do just that, amazes me?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom