• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How much do you think Trump is implicated in the missing Epstein files?

How much do you think Trump is implicated in the missing Epstein files?


  • Total voters
    25

Absentglare

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Messages
45,280
Reaction score
16,770
Location
California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
The FBI has been going through a huge quantity of Epstein files.

Now we have heard that many of those files are unexpectedly disappearing, Pam Bondi gave a panicked response just the other day about them:



Here’s Trump giving a very, very suspicious response about releasing the files on his close friend Epstein:



We already know Trump is featured on Epstein’s flight logs, how much do you think he will be implicated in the missing Epstein files?
 
The FBI has been going through a huge quantity of Epstein files.

Now we have heard that many of those files are unexpectedly disappearing, Pam Bondi gave a panicked response just the other day about them:



Here’s Trump giving a very, very suspicious response about releasing the files on his close friend Epstein:



We already know Trump is featured on Epstein’s flight logs, how much do you think he will be implicated in the missing Epstein files?

The CT section is further down...
 
The CT section is further down...
Trump direct quote:
I've known Jeff for 15 years - terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.

Trump used to barge in on his contestants changing rooms:
At least four women who competed in a Miss Teen USA beauty pageant told BuzzFeed News that Donald Trump walked into their dressing room while the contestants as young as 15 were undressing.

Another Trump quote:
Well, I'll tell you the funniest is that before a show, I'll go backstage and everyone's getting dressed, and everything else, and you know, no men are anywhere, and I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant and therefore I'm inspecting it. You know, I'm inspecting because I want to make sure that everything is good.


He’s already implicated publicly as raping an underage girl with Epstein:

“Jane Doe” aka “Katie Johnson” – 1994. Lawsuit filed June 2016, refiled October 2016 as reported by Buzzfeed and others, then dropped in November 2016.
Jane Doe is an unnamed plaintiff, who has also gone by “Katie Johnson” in legal papers. She claims she was repeatedly raped by Trump and Jeffery Epstein at Epstein’s New York City apartment in 1994, when she was 13 years old. A witness, also given a pseudonym — “Tiffany Doe” — said she recruited “Jane Doe” and others. Doe, using the name “Johnson,” gave an interview to the Daily Mail in which she said she did not know who Trump was at the time of the alleged attack but identified him later when she saw him on television. It is not known why she withdrew the lawsuit. She has not spoken publicly or withdrawn her rape allegation since then.

Besides, you’re free to deny the evidence of your eyes and ears to vote 0%.
 
Do you e.g. mean 6-25% of the redacted material, 6-25% of the overall material, or 6/25 % on a general moral culpability scale? I get what you're asking, but there's a conceptual uncertainty in the framing (no offense intended) that makes it hard to know how to cast a vote, the 50% and more option isn't quite as emphatic enough as 110% rising to infinity.
 
Do you e.g. mean 6-25% of the redacted material, 6-25% of the overall material, or 6/25 % on a general moral culpability scale? I get what you're asking, but there's a conceptual uncertainty in the framing (no offense intended) that makes it hard to know how to cast a vote apart from the 110% option you don't actually offer.
In the content that the FBI “loses”, how much do you think he’s implicated?

I kind of expect he’s going to make sure some of his friend’s records also go missing.
 
In the content that the FBI “loses”, how much do you think he’s implicated?

I kind of expect he’s going to make sure some of his friend’s records also go missing.

Yeah, that's the issue, it's like do you mean 6-25% of the actual word count or a 6-25% chance of him being found guilty in a court of law of the crimes that may or may not come to light in the redacted documents?

Eh, it's late here, I'll just go and cast my vote thataway then.
 
The CT section is further down...

ok.

then where do we debate the Truest News at ?

seems it should be right here, or does that make you nervous?


Tosc emoji.gifanybody see thru some of the nervous posters here? what are they hiding...........again.


.
 
Absolutely nothing will surprise me anymore concerning Donald Trump. He’s rich enough to have traveled in just about any circles he’s desired.
 
I think it likely at this point. Other comments he's made about how "And, I mean, there are innocent people caught in there who it would be very bad if their names came out" pretty much sealed that for me, I think.
 
The FBI has been going through a huge quantity of Epstein files.

Now we have heard that many of those files are unexpectedly disappearing, Pam Bondi gave a panicked response just the other day about them:



Here’s Trump giving a very, very suspicious response about releasing the files on his close friend Epstein:



We already know Trump is featured on Epstein’s flight logs, how much do you think he will be implicated in the missing Epstein files?

Not at all.

Since they'll never see the light of day.
 
How can a person be partially implicated factored as a percentage?

Did you mean to ask how likely is he to be implicated, instead?
 
Except Epstein was picking up underaged girls at Trump's resorts.

😉

And in a way Trump implicated himself when he said that Epstein liked "younger" girls. Trump as much as admitted that he was aware of Epstein's illegal behavior.
 
And in a way Trump implicated himself when he said that Epstein liked "younger" girls. Trump as much as admitted that he was aware of Epstein's illegal behavior.

Trump on Epstein :

“It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do,” “And many of them are on the younger side.”

Fact :

In mid-2000,[26][27] Giuffre met Ghislaine Maxwell when working as a spa attendant at Donald Trump's private Mar-a-Lago club while reading a book about massage therapy.

Also a fact:

She wasn't the only girl Maxwell picked up for Epstein at Mar-A-Lago.

It's all a CT, man! Head to the CT forum! Am I doing this right, @Redress?

😅
 
Last edited:
Trump is surely implicated. My vote went for 6-25% simply because many other wealthy and famous people are also implicated. We know Trump and Epstein were close friends and there were audio clips released that showed Epstein knew the inner workings of Trump's first administration. Trump also had that strange comment on Ghilaine Maxwell "I wish her well." In other words, he was previously acquainted or even friends with her.
 
Trump will never release papers that implicate himself. Neither will his lackeys.
 
He is in there for sure, just from the black book and the flight logs we know his connections were deep, so of course they would have been looked at. In what capacity though, that remains to be seen. I hope we will know one day.
 
Trump is so all over the Epstein files...

..... ..... ..... That the pages stick together.'

WW
 
Back
Top Bottom