• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

How many copters are going to be shot down this week?

How many more helicopters?

  • The last 7 weeks, 1 per week, has been a fluke. No more will be shot down.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • They were all mechanical errors like the army originally said, those tapes are faked.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • We will use better armor and suppress them, no more downed copters.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • stay at 1/week

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • Things are going to get worse

    Votes: 1 50.0%

  • Total voters
    2
1 Helicopter lost per week is a sign of the "seriousness of the situation in Iraq"? :shock:

That people like you werent in any position of importance during WW2 are absolute proof of a kind and benevolent God.

I dont think WW2 and Iraq can be compared. 2 completely different scenarios. In ww2 we were the ones who'd been hit first, the goals were clear and failure was not an option that either side even mentioned. In this situation we were the ones to attack, the goals are as blurry as they can be and both sides have discussed pulling out.
 
1 Helicopter lost per week is a sign of the "seriousness of the situation in Iraq"? :shock:

UMMM ya. Also daily casualties, 655,000 to be exact.

That people like you werent in any position of importance during WW2 are absolute proof of a kind and benevolent God.

Yeah I wasn't born yet, however people like me (Soviet Partisans) were responsible for 80% of all German casualties
 
UMMM ya. Also daily casualties, 655,000 to be exact.
Oh really? Exactly 655,000 casualties everyday huh?



LeftHenry said:
Yeah I wasn't born yet, however people like me (Soviet Partisans) were responsible for 80% of all German casualties

And I thought you hated Stalin...:roll:
 
Oh really? Exactly 655,000 casualties everyday huh?

No, 655,000 in total according to a respected journal; the Lancet.

And I thought you hated Stalin...:roll:

Since I've been here my politics have slowly evolved. I started as essentially a left democrat but I had hardly any knowledge of the ideology I supported.

Since the last time I've been here, I read Stalin and more as well as talked with more people. No I don't hate Stalin because there are several factors necessary when analyzing Stalin's rights and wrongs.

If you want to discuss Stalin, start a thread of Private Message me and I'd be more than glad to debate with you. However this is not the thread. The fact remains that it was the Soviets and the volunteer worker militias who defended the world's first socialist republic which inflicted the most damage on the Nazis and it was the Communists who led the insurgencies in the occupied territories (China under Mao, Albania under Hoxha, France was shared between militant center rightists and communists), so Goobie is wrong.

Also, WWII has little to do with Iraq.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Moved, with pleasure.
The incompetence of Stace seems to know no limits. What is with this thread?
It looks more civil to me compared to many others upstairs.

Maybe we see TheHarshTruth leaving now because of nothing.

An obnoxious, useless war monger like Kandahar cries a little and an absolutely incompetent moderator sends a thread to the basement.

I understand the reflex because of the moderator in question and her situation, but Kandahar is not a baby anymore, there is need to run if he is like
:2bigcry: :2bigcry: :2bigcry:
 
The incompetence of Stace seems to know no limits. What is with this thread?
It looks more civil to me compared to many others upstairs.

Maybe we see TheHarshTruth leaving now because of nothing.

An obnoxious, useless war monger like Kandahar cries a little and an absolutely incompetent moderator sends a thread to the basement.

I understand the reflex because of the moderator in question and her situation, but Kandahar is not a baby anymore, there is need to run if he is like
:2bigcry: :2bigcry: :2bigcry:


He was a dipshit anyway. I cant think of one post where he backed up any f.u.c.k.i.n.g thing he said. He would just some other bullshit at you instead....:roll:
 
The incompetence of Stace seems to know no limits. :

Biting the hand that feeds you,I see.

You sure didn't mind when you manipulated her into giving me warning points for responding to one of your trolling posts.

Is she no longer useful to you?
 
He was a dipshit anyway. I cant think of one post where he backed up any *** thing he said. He would just some other *** at you instead....:roll:
Was he? Hmm, I don't know, I did not read much of his posts so far.
 
Biting the hand that feeds you,I see.

You sure didn't mind when you manipulated her into giving me warning points for responding to one of your trolling posts.

Is she no longer useful to you?
Was it like two weeks ago?

You deserved it.

Stace gave you warning points, which shows that she is a very competent moderator. We can be glad and thankful that she takes her time and efforts to keep this community running the way she does :2razz:
 
Stace gave you warning points, which shows that she is a very competent moderator. We can be glad and thankful that she takes her time and efforts to keep this community running the way she does :2razz:

My work here is done.
 
The incompetence of Stace seems to know no limits. What is with this thread?
It looks more civil to me compared to many others upstairs.

Maybe we see TheHarshTruth leaving now because of nothing.

An obnoxious, useless war monger like Kandahar cries a little and an absolutely incompetent moderator sends a thread to the basement.

I understand the reflex because of the moderator in question and her situation, but Kandahar is not a baby anymore, there is need to run if he is like

:roll: This thread degenerated within the first few posts. It would have been moved even if no one had asked.
 
:roll: This thread degenerated within the first few posts. It would have been moved even if no one had asked.
Yes, you are correct. Kandahar is not that often in the basement, so I wanted to use this chance to make him look bad, but it was stupid and unfair to involve you. I'm sorry, I did so.
 
Yes, you are correct. Kandahar is not that often in the basement, so I wanted to use this chance to make him look bad, but it was stupid and unfair to involve you. I'm sorry, I did so.

Eh, occupational hazard. We gets no love. :lol:
 
He was a dipshit anyway. I cant think of one post where he backed up any f.u.c.k.i.n.g thing he said. He would just some other bullshit at you instead....:roll:

I second that. The guy thought the basement was a censorship thing.
 
:roll: This thread degenerated within the first few posts. It would have been moved even if no one had asked.

Um no it didn't. It was one of the most civil threads around. Like Volker said, I've been in threads here where we gone tens of pages flaming each other yet no one does anything.

This really is just a question of the topic at hand...
 
Um no it didn't. It was one of the most civil threads around. Like Volker said, I've been in threads here where we gone tens of pages flaming each other yet no one does anything.

This really is just a question of the topic at hand...

You have a funny concept of civil, then.

We can't do anything about "ten pages of flaming each other" if we don't see it. Hmm...eleven mods, over 20 forums, with dozens of new threads started every day....factor in that those 11 mods have lives and can't all be on here 24/7, things DO slip past us, which is why we rely on the "report post" feature.

Regardless, the thread was moved, get over it.
 
No, 655,000 in total according to a respected journal; the Lancet.
A little bit of a miscommunication here, you said "UMMM ya. Also daily casualties, 655,000 to be exact. "
I thought you meant 655,000 casualties a day...
 
Um no it didn't. It was one of the most civil threads around. Like Volker said, I've been in threads here where we gone tens of pages flaming each other yet no one does anything.

This really is just a question of the topic at hand...

You want some cheese with that f.u.c.k.i.n.g whine moron?
 
I second that. The guy thought the basement was a censorship thing.

I don’t know bro.
Maybe if he had an higher IQ then that of a groundhog...............:lol:
 
He is a F.U.C.K.I.N.G. A.S.S. CLOWN...

That guys could own his own **** if he wanted too, he was a whiney bitch and he won't be missed.
 
So my question is how many more are going to be shot down in the future? Is it going to escalate? Are we going to somehow stop this better than we did the road side bombs? What do you think and why?

Ah, that's better. Now then:

Get raped. Then get raped again. Then get hit by a bus and die a slow, painful death. OK, pumpkin? Thxbye.
 
An obnoxious, useless war monger like Kandahar cries a little and an absolutely incompetent moderator sends a thread to the basement.

I understand the reflex because of the moderator in question and her situation, but Kandahar is not a baby anymore, there is need to run if he is like
:2bigcry: :2bigcry: :2bigcry:

So anyone who isn't cheering for the deaths of as many American soldiers as possible is an "obnoxious, useless warmonger"? I hate this war and I hope we get out immediately. But you fu<kstains who openly side with the Islamists are the warmongers.
 
Back
Top Bottom