• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How is this "storming the Capitol" and "insurrection?" Police hold doors for protesters on 1/6

munkle said:
Most of them haven't even been tried yet. You see what they do is say, plead guilty to lesser charges, and you can go home today. These are not hardened professional agitators like your Antifa buddies, who were the real instigators on 1/6. Shame on you and shame on America. And I don't even like Trump.

Click to expand...

You can kiss this little dead terrorist at the graveyard if you love these folks so much.
32DC62E2-6367-4597-8AB1-D398BAD697F8.jpeg
 
Luce said:
So in one (1) entrance, the police held the door, took selfies, etc.

Then this happened:

www.cnn.com

6 Capitol Police officers suspended, 29 others being investigated for alleged roles in riot

Six US Capitol Police officers have been suspended with pay, and 29 others have been placed under investigation, for their actions in the January 6 riot, a department spokesman said Thursday.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
Click to expand...
So instead of Antifa and BLM plants stirring up the rioters as we have heard for 18 months, it looks more like MAGA friendly officers colluding with the rioters/seditionists?
 
Buckeyes85 said:
So instead of Antifa and BLM plants stirring up the rioters as we have heard for 18 months, it looks more like MAGA friendly officers colluding with the rioters/seditionists?
Click to expand...

That seems to have been the case at one entrance to the building.
 
LetsGoBrandon said:
I did not cite any conspiracy theory. It's a fact that ranking republicans in the house of Reps have asked Crazy Nancy for all existing evidence in regards to the riot on 1/6. She has not done so.
Click to expand...
Given that there is an ongoing investigation, please cite me the authority under the house rules by which they have asked for "all existing evidence" and what rule/procedure she has failed to follow with such a request?
BTW- how much evidence have the "ranking republicans" turned over to the committee investigating 1/6?
 
Linc said:
I see many of them as Nixon’s dirty tricksters.
They’ve never given up cheating since then.
Click to expand...
We still got Roger Stone who has nixon tattooed on his back and a whole host of other problems. Nixon was a very dirty crook.
 
jcgriff2 said:
What do you think Pelosi, et. al., have been doing for the last few years with her "cast a wide net" fishing expeditions like demanding Trump's tax returns - for the last 40 years, but even 1 year is too much.

Pelosi is not entitled to Trump's tax returns.

2017, 8/9/20 -
He made $1.6 million as President
He donated $1.6 million
-0- Tax Due

I don't know the reason that Pelosi gave for wanting Trump's tax returns but she was not entitled to them.

Trump's returns finally went to Cyrus Vance, ex-DA of NY and just as Trump predicted - they were leaked the next day. Nice.

Vance went on to spend 4 solid years investigating Trump and found absolutely nothing improper or illegal. On his last day (he lost big time) on his way out he pleaded and pleaded saying he just needed more time and hoped the new DA would continue the investigation. Meanwhile, thousands of criminal cases went unprosecuted because this jackass had all eyes on Trump. Nice.
Click to expand...
The law is CRYSTAL clear that the house committees specified in the law.
 
jcgriff2 said:
But tax returns are supposed to be private and Pelosi knows she would need a search warrant or subpoena to get Trump's tax returns. Furthermore, it is ridiculous to think that a US Rep would file in court to obtain a warrant or subpoena unless it may benefit the Rep directly. No way in hell would Pelosi or the other 434 would file for a constituent.

Some of her constituents are asking her to get more documentation on Biden's mysterious $5 million income. When do you think she'll do that?

Y'all get "us democrats" and "them voters" confused very often.
Click to expand...
Bullshit… tax returns have only been private for part of the time federal income taxes have existed.
 
Buckeyes85 said:
First, you can't compare the purported failure to better plan for violence to the actual perpetrators of the violence as "2 wrongs."

Nor would I call law enforcement's preparation as a "massive failure" which is not to say not without flaws. How and why should they have prepared for an unprecedented attack on a federal building? From American citizens at a political rally? Should a deeper investigation into the failures of law enforcement be conducted because mass violence from attendees at republican political rallies should be expected to continue?
Click to expand...
They had enough evidence and it was quite predictable this was going to happen. These ****ers also planned violent intimidation efforts at local polling locations.
 
Buckeyes85 said:
Given that there is an ongoing investigation, please cite me the authority under the house rules by which they have asked for "all existing evidence" and what rule/procedure she has failed to follow with such a request?
BTW- how much evidence have the "ranking republicans" turned over to the committee investigating 1/6?
Click to expand...
You are not getting the point. The republicans as the minority do not have the subpoena power that Crazy Nancy and her goons have. he republicans have turned over all that was subpoened. In late January of next year, the republicans will have that subpoena power.
 
LetsGoBrandon said:
Yep. Refusing to provide them amounts to: "withholding evidence". When the republicans take over the house in late January, that evidence will be subpoenaed. Whatever Crazy Nancy has not shredded or burned will be provided.
Click to expand...
Can Pelosi tell the committee to screw off like the GQP did?
 
jcgriff2 said:
The video was all played behind closed doors so there is no source for anything! Pelosi sealed off the "dem only room", kept everything out of public view; leaked a few 'taken out of context' pics.

Can't let the evidence that clears someone get in the way of a corrupt politician's promise to put them in prison, right?

16 damn months of investigation and NOTHING - and still looking for crimes that never happened.
Click to expand...
The committee was formed on July 1, 2021. Do they not teach addition at Trump University?
 
bomberfox said:
We still got Roger Stone who has nixon tattooed on his back and a whole host of other problems. Nixon was a very dirty crook.
Click to expand...
Nixon said **** it after the 1960 election, though I was only 6-yoa.
 
LetsGoBrandon said:
Will Hillary Clinton (the hildabesat) comply with Durham's subpoenas?
Click to expand...

Not a fan of Hillary but she testified for hours during the pathetic Benghazi investigation. Durham has not been stopped, see that what Presidents do, they let investigators and the investigations continue without crying and firing.
 
The police should be arrested for aiding and abetting ......... plus numerous other charges probably.
And should be relieved of duty without pay pending findings.
 
americanwoman said:
If the government is systematically targeting citizens, sorry but eventually it's going to erupt. Whether they are left or right.

You want to justify a riot based on the Big Lie (no evidence of wide spread election fraud) because a justifiable riot occurred when a citizen was murdered on camera by a police officer.

You can blame Biden and "wokism" or whatever on the report below but to be clear this damning report was started under Trump in 2020.

www.startribune.com

EDITORIAL | A damning report on Minneapolis policing

State human rights report details pattern of racial discrimination over a decade.
www.startribune.com www.startribune.com

If you don't find it justifiable that's laughable because I know if it was white people being targeted and erupting against a brutal government system, you'd be cheering.
Click to expand...

Herein is your problem...You stated, "because a justifiable riot occurred when a citizen was murdered on camera by a police officer".....understand one thing, there is NO such thing as a "justifiable riot", only justifiable protests. You nonchalantly sweep the largest disruption of society with billions in damage, arson, stolen goods, murders, injured police officers, in which 'defund' the police mantra came from.....as if it's nothing.....then target your anger on the 6th, follow the 'false narratives' exactly as you all did during the Russian Collusion Delusion. Why do you all so easily allow and permit the propaganda sway your opinion so easily?
 
Gateman_Wen said:
Lol, whut? What does that have to do with the subject?
Click to expand...
Duh... Pelosi loses power; the new GOP Speaker comes along and opens everything up to the public, especially items the dems are hiding at all costs.

Why aren't all of these fruitless, asinine democrat investigations that never end made public? Because they go nowhere - ever.

Hell, dems still want Trump investigated again for Russian Collusion. 🤣🤣🤣😇
 
jcgriff2 said:
Duh... Pelosi loses power; the new GOP Speaker comes along and opens everything up to the public, especially items the dems are hiding at all costs.

Why aren't all of these fruitless, asinine democrat investigations that never end made public? Because they go nowhere - ever.

Hell, dems still want Trump investigated again for Russian Collusion. 🤣🤣🤣😇
Click to expand...
The reason the GOP has a woody about taking over the speaker's chair next year is to stop the investigation into what they've been hiding.

Nothing says "I have nothing to hide" like fighting a subpoena.
 
US&THEM said:
Not a fan of Hillary but she testified for hours during the pathetic Benghazi investigation. Durham has not been stopped, see that what Presidents do, they let investigators and the investigations continue without crying and firing.
Click to expand...

So who is stopping the 1/6 investigation? And Hillary testifying is not the same as Hillary cooperating.
 
LetsGoBrandon said:
So who is stopping the 1/6 investigation? And Hillary testifying is not the same as Hillary cooperating.
Click to expand...

The GOP has already announced they will stop it day one when they become the majority.
 
munkle said:
This will go down as one of the greatest crimes in American history, hundreds of 99% peaceful protesters being beaten and tortured by Democrats for exercising their right of peaceful protest. To this day.

Click to expand...


Lol, any wagers on how long this one is going to last on DP?
 
LetsGoBrandon said:
I would if it had a point. It did not have any real context other then "Trump ordered a toilet review". I suppose it's amusing on it's own, but will not quite catch on as "Let's Go Brandon" has.
Click to expand...
Only funny because they said he was flushing evidence. Then it makes sense why it was taking him 15 flushes for his dumps.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom