• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How is it self defense?

Dittohead not! said:
Before or after Rittenhouse started shooting?
Click to expand...

The first guy, before he made the first shot. The guy was stalking him. Rittenhouse was in retreat the whole time leading up to the first shooting, , trying to avoid trouble.
 
Simpletruther said:
The first guy, before he made the first shot. The guy was stalking him. Rittenhouse was in retreat the whole time leading up to the first shooting, , trying to avoid trouble.
Click to expand...

and yet he wound up shooting his "stalker" in the back. Doesn't that seem strange?
 
Dittohead not! said:
and yet he wound up shooting his "stalker" in the back. Doesn't that seem strange?
Click to expand...

Well, if that turns out to be accurate it is a factor. But then again, it might be the perp spun around after the first shot. It’s not a conclusive factor.m
 
Simpletruther said:
The first guy, before he made the first shot. The guy was stalking him. Rittenhouse was in retreat the whole time leading up to the first shooting, , trying to avoid trouble.
Click to expand...

If he was trying to avoid trouble, then he wouldn't have been brandishing an AR-15 at a racial justice protest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom