• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How Gerontocracy Explains the Matt Gaetz Clown Show

Loulit01

RESIST
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2021
Messages
30,888
Reaction score
48,644
Location
Hiding from ICE
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
The basic gerontocratic fiscal trap is easy to describe: As societies grow older, with longer life expectancies and fewer kids, their old-age commitments become steadily more costly as the share of voters who benefit from those commitments (and turn out to vote) increases. This makes it harder to fix fiscal problems, and it makes the path of least political resistance the protection of the old and the shortchanging of the young — who, thus shortchanged, start fewer families and deepen societal senescence.

But there is a further twist in American politics, which is that the party that would normally be the ideological vehicle for resisting the drift into gerontocratic stasis — the party of free markets and limited government — is also increasingly dependent on the votes of culturally conservative older voters. Which makes it especially politically challenging, even self-undermining, to undertake the kind of fiscal reforms that the right’s philosophy officially supports.

We need to lower the voting age.
 
Cope II: The Thread
 
The basic gerontocratic fiscal trap is easy to describe: As societies grow older, with longer life expectancies and fewer kids, their old-age commitments become steadily more costly as the share of voters who benefit from those commitments (and turn out to vote) increases. This makes it harder to fix fiscal problems, and it makes the path of least political resistance the protection of the old and the shortchanging of the young — who, thus shortchanged, start fewer families and deepen societal senescence.

But there is a further twist in American politics, which is that the party that would normally be the ideological vehicle for resisting the drift into gerontocratic stasis — the party of free markets and limited government — is also increasingly dependent on the votes of culturally conservative older voters. Which makes it especially politically challenging, even self-undermining, to undertake the kind of fiscal reforms that the right’s philosophy officially supports.

We need to lower the voting age.

Hi, Loulit01.

An interesting OP.

The first paragraph describes a feedback loop, but doesn't take into account any number of factors which can eventually slow the descent and bring it to a halt.

The second paragraph includes an assumption that political parties and their individual politicians actually pay attention to the ideology and adhere to it.

Regards, stay safe 'n well.
 
We need to lower the voting age.

Nah, young people can be misinformed just as easily as older people, and probably even more so. What's happening now is a result of individuals and corporations having too much power to disrupt governance in the public interest, the balance between private and public power tilted too much in the direction of private power.
 
The basic gerontocratic fiscal trap is easy to describe: As societies grow older, with longer life expectancies and fewer kids, their old-age commitments become steadily more costly as the share of voters who benefit from those commitments (and turn out to vote) increases. This makes it harder to fix fiscal problems, and it makes the path of least political resistance the protection of the old and the shortchanging of the young — who, thus shortchanged, start fewer families and deepen societal senescence.

But there is a further twist in American politics, which is that the party that would normally be the ideological vehicle for resisting the drift into gerontocratic stasis — the party of free markets and limited government — is also increasingly dependent on the votes of culturally conservative older voters. Which makes it especially politically challenging, even self-undermining, to undertake the kind of fiscal reforms that the right’s philosophy officially supports.

We need to lower the voting age.
Well, it would probably be very fitting to finally give Matt Gaetz' girlfriends the vote.
 
Hi, Loulit01.

An interesting OP.

The first paragraph describes a feedback loop, but doesn't take into account any number of factors which can eventually slow the descent and bring it to a halt.

The second paragraph includes an assumption that political parties and their individual politicians actually pay attention to the ideology and adhere to it.

Regards, stay safe 'n well.

A significant part of the ‘aging’ (boomer baby bubble?) problem is that Social Security had stopped creating a surplus and it’s ‘trust me’ fund is now being rapidly depleted.
 
Nah, young people can be misinformed just as easily as older people, and probably even more so. What's happening now is a result of individuals and corporations having too much power to disrupt governance in the public interest, the balance between private and public power tilted too much in the direction of private power.

I generally agree, but it’s too much donor class power with too much voter apathy (voting for team D or R with little regard for policy positions).
 
A significant part of the ‘aging’ (boomer baby bubble?) problem is that Social Security had stopped creating a surplus and it’s ‘trust me’ fund is now being rapidly depleted.

The Social Security 'fund' is a fanciful construct used by some ideologues to promulgate their agenda.

Regards, stay safe 'n well.
 
The Social Security 'fund' is a fanciful construct used by some ideologues to promulgate their agenda.

Regards, stay safe 'n well.

I have no idea where you got that idea.

The Social Security trust funds that about 67 million Americans rely on for benefits are scheduled to be depleted in 2034, one year earlier than was projected last year, according to the annual trustees’ report released by the Treasury Department on Friday.

Unless Congress takes action, at that time, 80% of scheduled benefits will be payable from the combined funds for old age and survivors insurance and disability insurance.

 
I have no idea where you got that idea.




There are two funds, both of which are detailed here: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/progdata/fundFAQ.html

I was referring primarily to comments which create the impression that the funds are going 'broke'.

Regards, stay safe 'n well.
 
Back
Top Bottom