St. Teresa of Avila said:If a person neither considers to Whom he is addressing himself, what he asks, nor what he is who ventures to speak to God, although his lips may utter many words, I do not call it prayer. Sometimes, indeed, one may pray devoutly without making all these considerations through having practised them at other times. The custom of speaking to God Almighty as freely as with a slave--caring nothing whether the words are suitable or not, but simply saying the first thing that comes to mind from being learnt by rote by frequent repetition--cannot be called prayer: God grant that no Christian may address Him in this manner. I trust His Majesty will prevent any of you, sisters, from doing so. Our habit in this Order of conversing about spiritual matters is a good preservative against such evil ways.
I don't see myself as separate from God, so it's a pretty relaxed affair.
So how do you pray? Do you keep in mind to whom it is that you are praying? Is it casual and relaxed, or do you prostrate yourself physically and spiritually before your Lord and God?[/FONT][/COLOR]
You're not separated from God? Then please, command a lightning bolt to come down and destroy my home. Let's see it.
so how do you pray? Do you keep in mind to whom it is that you are praying? Is it casual and relaxed, or do you prostrate yourself physically and spiritually before your lord and god?[/font][/color]
You're not separated from God? Then please, command a lightning bolt to come down and destroy my home. Let's see it.
not at all.
Depends.
If I am about to be run over by a truck, a quick mental "Lord, help!" is about as formal as I can manage.
If I am in the middle of something that requires my attention, my prayers may be very brief and silent.
Given a bit more time, and or privacy, I certainly seek to focus my mind on the fact that I am importuning the Omnipotent Creator and Final Arbiter of all the universe, with all the seriousness that entails.
However, in counterpoint, Jesus' said that those under his Grace could view God as their heavenly father, and used a term ("Abba") that could be considered equivalent to "Daddy" in modern parlance... which many interpret to mean that God does not want us to approach him as a fearful supplicant approaches a short-tempered King, but rather as a child that knows he is loved would approach his own familiar Father.
a) It is fair to say that ‘abba in Jesus’ time belonged to a familiar or colloquial register of language, as distinct from more formal andceremonious usage, though it would be unwise, in view of the usage of the Targum, to press this too far. But in any case it was not a childish expression comparable with ‘Daddy’: it was more a solemn, responsible, adult address to a Father.
Who said that I am God itself? That is a huge assumption on your part. I said I don't see myself as separate from it. If you have a child, is that child you?
I think of myself as an expression of it.
And suppose I did see myself as God. Why would I have any compulsion to prove anything to you?
Assuming she believes in an all loving God if she were God why would she show it by striking your property with a lightning bolt?
She could show it simply by hugging you or something (which any human can do).
You would never find out if that was the kind of proof you would be looking for.
SDo you keep in mind to whom it is that you are praying? Is it casual and relaxed, or do you prostrate yourself physically and spiritually before your Lord and God?[/FONT][/COLOR]o how do you pray?
I don't pray.
Then don't comment on the thread and show off your atheism as if it were something superior to faith.
Your child is not an expression of you. Your child is totally separate from you, though made by you, while you are definitely the authority over that child.
Because I see no reason for one who is created to believe that she is equal to or anywhere close to the Creator. That God even searches for us is one of the highest blessings our Lord gives us.
You have your belief system- I have mine.
But what is your "belief system" even based on? Just what you want to be true?
Not at all. It's based on a 35-year search, and encompasses more than you are probably even aware of at this stage of your life. It makes no difference to me what you believe. Neither of us have any proof whatsoever, and both of us believe what we do, for reasons that we ourselves understand.
Professor Thomas Arnold, for 14 years a headmaster of Rugby, author of the famous, History of Rome, and appointed to the chair of modern history at Oxford, was well acquainted with the value of evidence in determining historical facts. This great scholar said: "I have been used for many years to study the histories of other times, and to examine and weigh the evidence of those who have written about them, and I know of no one fact in the history of mankind which is proved by better and fuller evidence of every sort, to the understanding of a fair inquirer, than the great sign which God hath given us that Christ died and rose again from the dead." Brooke Foss Westcott, an English scholar, said: "raking all the evidence together, it is not too much to say that there is no historic incident better or more variously supported than the resurrection of Christ. Nothing but the antecedent assumption that it must be false could have suggested the idea of deficiency in the proof of it."
I have plenty of proof, and reasons for my faith. My faith stems for the resurrection and the entirely plausible historical account that it actually happened, and from there follows the authority of the Church.
Well, good for you. I don't believe that the church has any authority, and I have doubts about the accuracy of the Bible itself, after having been adulterated by people in power, over the ages. If you are satisfied with what you see, and feel secure in your faith, then that is the right faith for you. For me, it is not. We must all find our own path, and what is true to you, may be false to me. All paths lead to the same place ultimately, so enjoy your journey.
So you believe that the Bible was adulterated without any evidence, and yet you reject that Jesus rose from the dead despite the plentiful evidence. How is that reasonable?
There you go assuming once again. Where did I say that I reject anything at all about Jesus?
Because have you looked to how Jesus tells us to pray and worship God? Look at the people upon whom He finds favor:
.
I have plenty of proof, and reasons for my faith. ..................................
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?